On the optimization of schedules for MapReduce workloads in the presence of shared scans

On the optimization of schedules for MapReduce workloads in the presence of shared scans We consider MapReduce clusters designed to support multiple concurrent jobs, concentrating on environments in which the number of distinct datasets is modest relative to the number of jobs. In such scenarios, many individual datasets are likely to be scanned concurrently by multiple Map phase jobs. As has been noticed previously, this scenario provides an opportunity for Map phase jobs to cooperate , sharing the scans of these datasets, and thus reducing the costs of such scans. Our paper has three main contributions over previous work. First, we present a novel and highly general method for sharing scans and thus amortizing their costs. This concept, which we call cyclic piggybacking , has a number of advantages over the more traditional batching scheme described in the literature. Second, we notice that the various subjobs generated in this manner can be assumed in an optimal schedule to respect a natural chain precedence ordering. Third, we describe a significant but natural generalization of the recently introduced FLEX scheduler for optimizing schedules within the context of this cyclic piggybacking paradigm, which can be tailored to a variety of cost metrics. Such cost metrics include average response time, average stretch, and any minimax-type metric—a total of 11 separate and standard metrics in all. Moreover, most of this carries over in the more general case of overlapping rather than identical datasets as well, employing what we will call semi-shared scans. In such scenarios, chain precedence is replaced by arbitrary precedence, but we can still handle 8 of the original 11 metrics. The overall approach, including both cyclic piggybacking and the FLEX scheduling generalization, is called CIRCUMFLEX . We describe some practical implementation strategies. And we evaluate the performance of CIRCUMFLEX via a variety of simulation and real benchmark experiments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The VLDB Journal Springer Journals

On the optimization of schedules for MapReduce workloads in the presence of shared scans

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/on-the-optimization-of-schedules-for-mapreduce-workloads-in-the-exQs0m04M5
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Computer Science; Database Management
ISSN
1066-8888
eISSN
0949-877X
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00778-012-0279-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We consider MapReduce clusters designed to support multiple concurrent jobs, concentrating on environments in which the number of distinct datasets is modest relative to the number of jobs. In such scenarios, many individual datasets are likely to be scanned concurrently by multiple Map phase jobs. As has been noticed previously, this scenario provides an opportunity for Map phase jobs to cooperate , sharing the scans of these datasets, and thus reducing the costs of such scans. Our paper has three main contributions over previous work. First, we present a novel and highly general method for sharing scans and thus amortizing their costs. This concept, which we call cyclic piggybacking , has a number of advantages over the more traditional batching scheme described in the literature. Second, we notice that the various subjobs generated in this manner can be assumed in an optimal schedule to respect a natural chain precedence ordering. Third, we describe a significant but natural generalization of the recently introduced FLEX scheduler for optimizing schedules within the context of this cyclic piggybacking paradigm, which can be tailored to a variety of cost metrics. Such cost metrics include average response time, average stretch, and any minimax-type metric—a total of 11 separate and standard metrics in all. Moreover, most of this carries over in the more general case of overlapping rather than identical datasets as well, employing what we will call semi-shared scans. In such scenarios, chain precedence is replaced by arbitrary precedence, but we can still handle 8 of the original 11 metrics. The overall approach, including both cyclic piggybacking and the FLEX scheduling generalization, is called CIRCUMFLEX . We describe some practical implementation strategies. And we evaluate the performance of CIRCUMFLEX via a variety of simulation and real benchmark experiments.

Journal

The VLDB JournalSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 1, 2012

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off