On the hermeneutics debate: An introduction to a symposium on Don Lavoie's “The Interpretive Dimension of Economics—Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxeology”

On the hermeneutics debate: An introduction to a symposium on Don Lavoie's “The Interpretive... Rev Austrian Econ (2011) 24:85–89 DOI 10.1007/s11138-010-0139-8 On the hermeneutics debate: An introduction to a symposium on Don Lavoie's “The Interpretive Dimension of Economics—Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxeology” Virgil Henry Storr Published online: 30 December 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Donald Lavoie is best known outside of Austrian economics for his work on the “socialist calculation debate.” In his Rivalry and Central Planning (1985), published by Cambridge University Press, he argued that the traditional account of the debate over the possibility of rational economic calculation under socialism was incorrect. While it was widely argued that the Austrians lost that debate to the market socialists, Lavoie established that Lange and Lerner never really addressed Mises and Hayek's chief concerns. Rather than losing the debate, as Lavoie demonstrated, the Austrians actually won it. After Lavoie, it became impossible to maintain the standard account. Ironically, Lavoie is probably best known within Austrian economics for his role in starting, advancing, and, then, supposedly losing another debate that embroiled the Austrian school. The “hermeneutics debate” began in 1985 when George Mason University's Center for the Study of Market Processes released Don Lavoie's working paper “The Interpretive Dimension of Economics—Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxeology.” Lavoie argued http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Review of Austrian Economics Springer Journals

On the hermeneutics debate: An introduction to a symposium on Don Lavoie's “The Interpretive Dimension of Economics—Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxeology”

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/on-the-hermeneutics-debate-an-introduction-to-a-symposium-on-don-ymXzn87CTg
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Economics; Public Finance; Political Science; History of Economic Thought/Methodology
ISSN
0889-3047
eISSN
1573-7128
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11138-010-0139-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Rev Austrian Econ (2011) 24:85–89 DOI 10.1007/s11138-010-0139-8 On the hermeneutics debate: An introduction to a symposium on Don Lavoie's “The Interpretive Dimension of Economics—Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxeology” Virgil Henry Storr Published online: 30 December 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Donald Lavoie is best known outside of Austrian economics for his work on the “socialist calculation debate.” In his Rivalry and Central Planning (1985), published by Cambridge University Press, he argued that the traditional account of the debate over the possibility of rational economic calculation under socialism was incorrect. While it was widely argued that the Austrians lost that debate to the market socialists, Lavoie established that Lange and Lerner never really addressed Mises and Hayek's chief concerns. Rather than losing the debate, as Lavoie demonstrated, the Austrians actually won it. After Lavoie, it became impossible to maintain the standard account. Ironically, Lavoie is probably best known within Austrian economics for his role in starting, advancing, and, then, supposedly losing another debate that embroiled the Austrian school. The “hermeneutics debate” began in 1985 when George Mason University's Center for the Study of Market Processes released Don Lavoie's working paper “The Interpretive Dimension of Economics—Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxeology.” Lavoie argued

Journal

The Review of Austrian EconomicsSpringer Journals

Published: Dec 30, 2010

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off