Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
AG Greenwald, TA Poehlman, E Uhlmann, MR Banaji (2009)
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validityJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97
Konrad Schnabel, J. Asendorpf, A. Greenwald (2008)
Understanding and using the implicit association test: V. measuring semantic aspects of trait self‐conceptsEuropean Journal of Personality, 22
M. Steffens, S. König (2006)
Predicting Spontaneous Big Five Behavior with Implicit Association TestsEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22
(2007)
Big five questionnaire-2: Manuale
Joseph Rosse, M. Stecher, Janice Miller, R. Levin (1998)
The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83
M. Steffens (2004)
Is the implicit association test immune to faking?Experimental psychology, 51 3
Wendy Dunn, M. Mount, Murray Barrick, D. Ones (1995)
Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers' judgments of applicant qualifications.The Journal of applied psychology, 80 4
S. Schmukle, B. Egloff (2005)
A Latent State-Trait Analysis of Implicit and Explicit Personality MeasuresEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21
EL Haines, KE Sumner (2006)
Implicit measurement of attitudes, stereotypes, and self-concepts in organizations: teaching old dogmas new tricksOrganizational Research Methods, 9
Scott Birkeland, Todd Manson, Jennifer Kisamore, M. Brannick, Mark Smith (2006)
A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality MeasuresLabor: Personnel Economics
J. Digman (1990)
PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODELAnnual Review of Psychology, 41
Jill Ellingson, P. Sackett, L. Hough (1999)
Social desirability corrections in personality measurement : Issues of applicant comparison and construct validityJournal of Applied Psychology, 84
Silvia Măgurean, D. Vîrgă, F. Sava (2014)
Implicit and explicit personality assessment in the context of personnel selection, 12
Bertram Gawronski, B. Payne (2010)
Handbook of implicit social cognition : measurement, theory,and applications
L. Hough (1998)
Effects of Intentional Distortion in Personality Measurement and evaluation of Suggested PalliativesHuman Performance, 11
C. Viswesvaran, D. Ones, F. Schmidt (1996)
Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratingsJournal of Applied Psychology, 81
(2007)
Vecchione,M. (2007).Big five questionnaire-2: Manuale. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali
G. Caprara, C. Barbaranelli, Laura Borgogni, M. Perugini (1993)
The "big five questionnaire": A new questionnaire to assess the five factor modelPersonality and Individual Differences, 15
W. Hofmann, Tobias Gschwendner, Brian Nosek, Manfred Schmitt (2005)
What moderates implicit—explicit consistency?European Review of Social Psychology, 16
T. Judge, C. Higgins, Carl Thoresen, Murray Barrick (1999)
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS, GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY, AND CAREER SUCCESS ACROSS THE LIFE SPANPersonnel Psychology, 52
AG Greenwald, BA Nosek (2008)
Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures
C. Viswesvaran, D. Ones (2000)
Perspectives on Models of Job PerformanceInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8
M. Mount, Murray Barrick, G. Stewart (1998)
Five-Factor Model of personality and Performance in Jobs Involving Interpersonal InteractionsHuman Performance, 11
M. Vecchione, G. Alessandri, C. Barbaranelli (2012)
The Five Factor Model in personnel selection: Measurement equivalence between applicant and non-applicant groupsPersonality and Individual Differences, 52
Keith Leavitt, Christina Fong, A. Greenwald (2011)
Asking about well‐being gets you half an answer: Intra‐individual processes of implicit and explicit job attitudesJournal of Organizational Behavior, 32
S. Schmukle, M. Back, B. Egloff (2008)
Validity of the Five-Factor Model for the Implicit Self-Concept of PersonalityEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24
Meta-analysis of predictive validity
Sarah Teige-Mocigemba, K. Klauer, J. Sherman (2010)
7. A practical guide to implicit association tests and related tasks
Elizabeth Haines, Kenneth Sumner (2006)
Implicit Measurement of Attitudes, Stereotypes, and Self-Concepts in OrganizationsOrganizational Research Methods, 9
A. Greenwald, Brian Nosek, M. Banaji (2003)
Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.Journal of personality and social psychology, 85 2
L. Hough, F. Oswald, Robert Ployhart (2001)
Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence and Lessons LearnedInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9
D. Adler (2016)
Using Multivariate Statistics
M. Back, S. Schmukle, B. Egloff (2009)
Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality.Journal of personality and social psychology, 97 3
F. Strack, Roland Deutsch (2004)
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social BehaviorPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 8
Konrad Schnabel, R. Banse, J. Asendorpf (2006)
Employing automatic approach and avoidance tendencies for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept: The implicit association procedure (IAP).Experimental psychology, 53 1
J. Black (2000)
Personality Testing and Police Selection: Utility of the `Big Five'New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 29
A. Greenwald, Brian Nosek (2009)
Attitudinal Dissociation: What Does It Mean?
A. Greenwald, D. McGhee, Jordan Schwartz (1998)
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.Journal of personality and social psychology, 74 6
Murray Barrick, M. Mount, T. Judge (2001)
Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9
Two studies were conducted with the aim of investigating whether the Big Five traits, as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT), predict supervisor ratings of job performance. Two incumbent groups composed respectively by 52 security guards (Study 1) and 71 semi-skilled workers (Study 2) completed a self-report measure of the Big-Five and five IATs for assessing the same personality dimensions in an implicit way. In study 1, job performance was positively related to self-ratings of energy/extraversion (r = .35, p < .01), agreeableness (r = .25, p < .01), and conscientiousness (r = .22, p < .05), and to the implicit measure of conscientiousness (r = .27, p < .05). In study 2, job performance was positively related to explicit conscientiousness (r = .26, p < .05) and emotional stability (r = .26, p < .05), and to the implicit counterparts of the same traits (r = .25, p < .05, for conscientiousness, and r = .24, p < .05, for emotional stability). These relations held after controlling for the effect of pure valence, as measured by implicit self-esteem (Study 2). In both studies, implicit and explicit measures of personality traits predict unique aspects of job performance (i.e. they have incremental validity over each other). Practical implications of findings and future research directions are discussed.
Current Psychology – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 2, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.