On the aggregation of credit, market and operational risks

On the aggregation of credit, market and operational risks Risk aggregation considering inter-risk dependence has always been a challenge to both researchers and practitioners. The objective of this study is to formulate ways of aggregation of bank risks and comprehensively compare simple summation, variance–covariance and copula approach. Firstly, the three popular approaches are adopted to aggregate credit risk, market risk and operational risk of banks based on Austrian banking data. Then, two comparisons are mainly made. Total risks aggregated by different approaches are compared to analyze their relative magnitudes. Diversification benefits of different approaches are further compared to investigate their tail dependence structures. Based on the empirical analysis, some facts are verified and some interesting findings are uncovered, leading to the conclusions that simple summation approach is too conservative and variance–covariance approach is overly optimistic, so it is suggested that copula approach is the future major trend for bank risk aggregation. Especially, t copula with degree of freedom between 1 and 10 is a good choice to capture tail dependence while Gaussian copula is not recommended. Besides, the proposed mixture copula consisting of t copula and Gumbel copula exhibits heavier right tail dependence than single t copula. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Springer Journals

On the aggregation of credit, market and operational risks

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/on-the-aggregation-of-credit-market-and-operational-risks-pC0L3C4iCQ
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Economics / Management Science; Finance/Investment/Banking; Accounting/Auditing; Econometrics; Operations Research/Decision Theory
ISSN
0924-865X
eISSN
1573-7179
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11156-013-0426-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Risk aggregation considering inter-risk dependence has always been a challenge to both researchers and practitioners. The objective of this study is to formulate ways of aggregation of bank risks and comprehensively compare simple summation, variance–covariance and copula approach. Firstly, the three popular approaches are adopted to aggregate credit risk, market risk and operational risk of banks based on Austrian banking data. Then, two comparisons are mainly made. Total risks aggregated by different approaches are compared to analyze their relative magnitudes. Diversification benefits of different approaches are further compared to investigate their tail dependence structures. Based on the empirical analysis, some facts are verified and some interesting findings are uncovered, leading to the conclusions that simple summation approach is too conservative and variance–covariance approach is overly optimistic, so it is suggested that copula approach is the future major trend for bank risk aggregation. Especially, t copula with degree of freedom between 1 and 10 is a good choice to capture tail dependence while Gaussian copula is not recommended. Besides, the proposed mixture copula consisting of t copula and Gumbel copula exhibits heavier right tail dependence than single t copula.

Journal

Review of Quantitative Finance and AccountingSpringer Journals

Published: Dec 28, 2013

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off