Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Cashin, N. Olekalns, R. Sahay (1998)
Tax Smoothing in a Financially Repressed Economy: Evidence from IndiaMacroeconomics eJournal
(1986)
Deficits since World War I
M. Chaudhary, S. Anwar (2000)
Foreign Debt, Dependency, and Economic Growth in South AsiaThe Pakistan Development Review, 39
J. Campbell (1987)
Does Saving Anticipate Declining Labor Income? an Alternative Test of the Permanent Income HypothesisMacroeconomics: Consumption
Chaipat Sahasakul (1986)
The U.S. evidence on optimal taxation over timeJournal of Monetary Economics, 18
R. Barro (1979)
On the Determination of the Public DebtJournal of Political Economy, 87
Ihtsham Padda (2009)
Have Developing Countries been Seeking to Minimize Welfare Cost of Taxation? Evidence from Barro’s Tax Smoothing Hypothesis
A. Ghosh (1995)
Intertemporal Tax-Smoothing and the Government Budget Surplus: Canada and the United StatesJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27
Significance at 5 and 10 % level. The lag length is selected on the basis of Schwarz information criterion
(1998)
Deficits, government expenditure, and tax smoothing in the United States: 1929–1998
J. Ashworth, J. Evans (1996)
Seigniorage and Tax Smoothing: Testing the Extended Tax Smoothing Model in Developing Countries.
Bharat Trehan, C. Walsh (1988)
Common trends, the government's budget constraint, and revenue smoothingJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12
A. Scott (1999)
Does Tax Smoothing Imply Smooth Taxes
Apostolos Serletis, Richard Schorn (1999)
International evidence on the tax- and revenue-smoothing hypotheses, 51
(1997)
International evidence of tax smoothing in a panel of nineteen industrial countries
JL Evans, MC Amey (1996)
Seigniorage and tax smoothing: testing the extended tax smoothing modelJ. Macroecon., 18
J Adler (2006)
The tax smoothing hypothesis: evidence from Sweden, 1952–1999Scand. J. Econ., 108
D. Dickey, W. Fuller (1979)
Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit RootJournal of the American Statistical Association, 74
D. Davies, R. Musgrave (1960)
The Theory of Public FinanceThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 42
Ihtsham Padda, Naeem Akram (2009)
The Impact of Tax Policies on Economic Growth: Evidence from South-Asian EconomiesThe Pakistan Development Review, 48
P. Cashin, N. Haque, N. Olekalns (2003)
Tax smoothing, tax tilting and fiscal sustainability in PakistanEconomic Modelling, 20
Naeem Akram, Ihtsham Padda, Mohammad Khan (2008)
The Long Term Impact of Health on Economic Growth in PakistanThe Pakistan Development Review, 47
P. Narayan (2005)
The government revenue and government expenditure nexus: empirical evidence from nine Asian countriesJournal of Asian Economics, 15
R. Engle, C. Granger (1987)
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testingEconometrica, 55
(1989)
A European Central Bank? Perspectives on Monetary Unification after 10 years of the EMS
P. Cashin, Nadeem Haque, N. Olekalns (1999)
Spend Now, Pay Later? Tax Smoothing and Fiscal Sustainability in South AsiaPublic Economics: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal
Carson Chow, Julian Lectureship (2010)
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
H. Bohn (1990)
Tax Smoothing with Financial InstrumentsThe American Economic Review, 80
W. Alik (2012)
Budget Balance through Revenue or Spending Adjustment: Evidence from Pakistan
Ananda Jayawickrama, T. Abeysinghe (2013)
The experience of some OECD economies on tax smoothingApplied Economics, 45
Haq Padda, S. Hyder, Naeem Akram (2011)
An Appraisal of Fiscal Decentralization in PakistanJournal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 12
Mark Strazicich (1997)
Does Tax Smoothing Differ by the Level of Government? Time Series Evidence from Canada and the United StatesJournal of Macroeconomics, 19
John Adler (2006)
The Tax-Smoothing Hypothesis: Evidence from Sweden, 1952-1999Economic History
J. Ashworth, L. Evans (1998)
Seigniorage and tax smoothing in developing countriesJournal of Economic Studies, 25
This study evaluates whether India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka minimized the welfare cost of their fiscal policies? For this purpose it tests tax smoothing hypothesis and finds that there is a weak tax smoothing in Pakistan and Sri Lanka whilst fiscal policy in India has not been conducted in an optimal fashion in accordance with the predictions of the hypothesis. The difference in results is due to difference in budget deficits as the deficits of Pakistan and Sri Lanka are higher as compare to India so they are careful to reduce volatility in budget deficits by trying to keep close correspondence between taxes and expenditures while India, with comparatively less deficit, was more careful regarding its debt. Therefore, to minimize the cost a close correspondence between permanent expenditure and taxes are required. In this context the best policy option would be an initiation of prompt action program of tax base expansions and expenditure rationalization.
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: May 5, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.