Int J Life Cycle Assess (2017) 22:1475–1476 DOI 10.1007/s11367-017-1358-z LETTER TO THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 1,2 Reinout Heijungs Received: 24 April 2017 /Accepted: 20 June 2017 /Published online: 5 July 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Seto et al. (2017) present an analysis of five software packages Bcriteria for the evaluation of life cycle assessment software for life cycle assessment (LCA). They point out that LCA packages and life cycle inventory data,^ and that concrete is software should not only be compared in an abstract way. only an Bapplication.^ Indeed, the analysis by Ciroth (2012) might be regarded as a Next, although the abstract innocently mentions that Bsoftware package C^ performed best, a closer look reveals bit clinical, as the proof of the pudding is in the end supposed to be in its eating. Three other recent publications (Speck et al. that there is a suspicious connection at work: software pack- 2015a, b and Herrmann and Moltesen 2015) in fact concen- age C is in fact GaBi, and the responsible editor of this article trate on the results delivered by different software. It is strange was Martin Baitz, who happens to be employed by Thinkstep that Seto et al. (2017) seem to
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 5, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera