Normal temporal binding window but no sound-induced flash illusion in people with one eye

Normal temporal binding window but no sound-induced flash illusion in people with one eye Integrating vision and hearing is an important way in which we process our rich sensory environment. Partial deprivation of the visual system from the loss of one eye early in life results in adaptive changes in the remaining senses (e.g., Hoover et al. in Exp Brain Res 216:565–74, 2012). The current study investigates whether losing one eye early in life impacts the temporal window in which audiovisual events are integrated and whether there is vulnerability to the sound-induced flash illusion. In Experiment 1, we measured the temporal binding window with a simultaneity judgement task where low-level auditory and visual stimuli were presented at different stimulus onset asynchronies. People with one eye did not differ in the width of their temporal binding window, but they took longer to make judgements compared to binocular viewing controls. In Experiment 2, we measured how many light flashes were perceived when a single flash was paired with multiple auditory beeps in close succession (sound induced flash illusion). Unlike controls, who perceived multiple light flashes with two, three or four beeps, people with one eye were not susceptible to the sound-induced flash illusion. In addition, they took no longer to respond compared to both binocular and monocular (eye-patched) viewing controls. Taken together, these results suggest that the lack of susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion in people with one eye cannot be accounted for by the width of the temporal binding window. These results provide evidence for adaptations in audiovisual integration due to the reduction of visual input from the loss of one eye early in life. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Experimental Brain Research Springer Journals

Normal temporal binding window but no sound-induced flash illusion in people with one eye

10 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/normal-temporal-binding-window-but-no-sound-induced-flash-illusion-in-BU11lKzlT1
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Biomedicine; Neurosciences; Neurology
ISSN
0014-4819
eISSN
1432-1106
DOI
10.1007/s00221-018-5263-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Integrating vision and hearing is an important way in which we process our rich sensory environment. Partial deprivation of the visual system from the loss of one eye early in life results in adaptive changes in the remaining senses (e.g., Hoover et al. in Exp Brain Res 216:565–74, 2012). The current study investigates whether losing one eye early in life impacts the temporal window in which audiovisual events are integrated and whether there is vulnerability to the sound-induced flash illusion. In Experiment 1, we measured the temporal binding window with a simultaneity judgement task where low-level auditory and visual stimuli were presented at different stimulus onset asynchronies. People with one eye did not differ in the width of their temporal binding window, but they took longer to make judgements compared to binocular viewing controls. In Experiment 2, we measured how many light flashes were perceived when a single flash was paired with multiple auditory beeps in close succession (sound induced flash illusion). Unlike controls, who perceived multiple light flashes with two, three or four beeps, people with one eye were not susceptible to the sound-induced flash illusion. In addition, they took no longer to respond compared to both binocular and monocular (eye-patched) viewing controls. Taken together, these results suggest that the lack of susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion in people with one eye cannot be accounted for by the width of the temporal binding window. These results provide evidence for adaptations in audiovisual integration due to the reduction of visual input from the loss of one eye early in life.

Journal

Experimental Brain Research – Springer Journals

Published: Apr 19, 2018

References

  • The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration
    Alais, D; Burr, D
  • Multisensory processing in review: from physiology to behaviour
    Alais, D; Newell, FN; Mamassian, P
  • Forty years after hearing lips and seeing voices: the McGurk effect revisited
    Alsius, A; Paré, M; Munhall, K
  • Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization
    Battaglia, PW; Jacobs, RA; Aslin, RN
  • Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location
    Bertelson, P; Aschersleben, G
  • Assessing the role of the ‘unity assumption’ on multisensory integration: a review
    Chen, Y-C; Spence, C
  • Human sensory dominance
    Colavita, FB
  • A further investigation of visual dominance
    Colavita, FB; Weisberg, D
  • Visual development
    Daw, NW
  • On the locus of visual dominance
    Egeth, HE; Sager, LC
  • Expansion of the tonotopic area in the auditory cortex of the blind
    Elbert, T; Sterr, A; Rockstroh, B; Pantev, C; Müller, MM; Taub, E
  • An extended multisensory temporal binding window in autism spectrum disorders
    Foss-Feig, JH; Kwakye, LD; Cascio, CJ; Burnette, CP; Kadivar, H; Stone, WL; Wallace, MT
  • Integral processing of visual place and auditory voicing information during phonetic perception
    Green, KP; Kuhl, PK
  • Vision and attention
  • Sensory compensation in sound localization in people with one eye
    Hoover, AEN; Harris, L; Steeves, JKE
  • Visual influences on auditory spatial learning
    King, AJ
  • Altered auditory and multisensory temporal processing in autism spectrum disorders
    Kwakye, LD; Foss-Feig, JH; Cascio, CJ; Stone, WL; Wallace, MT
  • Early blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects
    Lessard, N; Pare, M; Lepore, F; Lassonde, M
  • Evaluation and integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception
    Massaro, DW; Cohen, MM
  • No Colavita effect: equal auditory and visual processing in people with one eye
    Moro, SS; Steeves, JKE
  • No Colavita effect: Increasing temporal load maintains equal auditory and visual processing in people with one eye
    Moro, SS; Steeves, JKE
  • Optimal audiovisual processing in people with one eye
    Moro, SS; Harris, LR; Steeves, JKE
  • Exposure to asynchronous audiovisual speech extends the temporal window for audiovisual integration
    Navarra, J; Vatakis, A; Zampini, M; Humphreys, W; Soto-Faraco, S; Spence, C
  • Neural correlates of multisensory perceptual learning
    Powers, AR; Hevey, MA; Wallace, MT
  • Early and late beta band power reflects audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion
    Romero, Y; Senkowski, D; Keil, J
  • Illusions. What you see is what you hear
    Shams, L; Kamitani, Y; Shimojo, S
  • The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation
    Sinnett, S; Soto-Faraco, S; Spence, C
  • Explaining the colavita visual dominance effect
    Spence, C
  • Frontiers in the neural bases of multisensory processes
    Spence, C; Parise, C; Chen, Y-C
  • Vision with one eye: a review of visual function following monocular enucleation
    Steeves, JKE; González, EG; Steinbach, MJ
  • Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict susceptibility to audiovisual illusions
    Stevenson, RA; Zemtsov, RK; Wallace, MT
  • Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance
    Stevenson, RA; Krueger Fister, J; Barnett, ZP; Nidiffer, AR; Wallace, MT
  • A comparison of the development of audiovisual integration in children with autism spectrum disorders and typically developing children
    Taylor, N; Isaac, C; Milne, E
  • Perception of intersensory synchrony: a tutorial review
    Vroomen, J; Keetels, M
  • Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy
    Welch, RB; Warren, DH
  • Altered white matter structure in the visual system following early monocular enucleation
    Wong, NA; Rafique, SA; Kelly, KR; Moro, SS; Gallie, BL; Steeves, JKE

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial