No purely epistemic theory can account for the naturalness of kinds

No purely epistemic theory can account for the naturalness of kinds Synthese https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1806-8 S.I.: NATURAL KINDS: LANGUAGE, SCIENCE, AND METAPHYSICS No purely epistemic theory can account for the naturalness of kinds Olivier Lemeire Received: 15 December 2017 / Accepted: 6 May 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Several philosophers have recently tried to define natural kinds in epistemic terms only. Given the persistent problems with finding a successful metaphysical theory, these philosophers argue that we would do better to describe natural kinds solely in terms of their epistemic usefulness, such as their role in supporting inductive inferences. In this paper, I argue against these epistemology-only theories of natural kinds and in favor of, at least partly, metaphysical theories. I do so in three steps. In the first section of the paper, I propose two desiderata for a theory of natural kinds. In the second section, I discuss one example of a ‘general’ epistemology-only theory, proposed by Marc Ereshefsky and Thomas Reydon, and argue that theories like theirs fail to provide adequate criteria of natural kinds. In the third section, I focus on one example of a ‘specific’ epistemology-only theory, proposed by P. D. Magnus, and use it to show why such theories cannot justify http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Synthese Springer Journals

No purely epistemic theory can account for the naturalness of kinds

Synthese , Volume OnlineFirst – May 22, 2018
Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/no-purely-epistemic-theory-can-account-for-the-naturalness-of-kinds-nTQTd04dXS
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
Subject
Philosophy; Philosophy of Science; Epistemology; Logic; Philosophy of Language; Metaphysics
ISSN
0039-7857
eISSN
1573-0964
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11229-018-1806-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Synthese https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1806-8 S.I.: NATURAL KINDS: LANGUAGE, SCIENCE, AND METAPHYSICS No purely epistemic theory can account for the naturalness of kinds Olivier Lemeire Received: 15 December 2017 / Accepted: 6 May 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Several philosophers have recently tried to define natural kinds in epistemic terms only. Given the persistent problems with finding a successful metaphysical theory, these philosophers argue that we would do better to describe natural kinds solely in terms of their epistemic usefulness, such as their role in supporting inductive inferences. In this paper, I argue against these epistemology-only theories of natural kinds and in favor of, at least partly, metaphysical theories. I do so in three steps. In the first section of the paper, I propose two desiderata for a theory of natural kinds. In the second section, I discuss one example of a ‘general’ epistemology-only theory, proposed by Marc Ereshefsky and Thomas Reydon, and argue that theories like theirs fail to provide adequate criteria of natural kinds. In the third section, I focus on one example of a ‘specific’ epistemology-only theory, proposed by P. D. Magnus, and use it to show why such theories cannot justify

Journal

SyntheseSpringer Journals

Published: May 22, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off