No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis

No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis Introduction and hypothesis The objective of this trial was to tears was found between groups; however, the main limitation evaluate whether avoiding episiotomy can decrease the risk of of our study was unexpectedly high rates of episiotomy in the advanced perineal tears. nonepisiotomy group. Thus, the main conclusion is that inves- Material and methods In this randomized (1:1) parallel-group tigator monitoring and education should be continuously prac- superiority trial, primiparous women underwent randomiza- ticed throughout the trial duration, stressing the importance of tion into standard care (155 cases) vs. no episiotomy (154 adherence to the protocol. cases) groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of advanced (3rd- and 4th-degree) perineal tears. Secondary out- Keywords Episiotomy Obstetric anal sphincter injury comes included perineal integrity, suturing characteristics, second-stage duration, incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal variables, and various postpartum symptoms 2 days Introduction and 2 months after delivery. Results At prespecified 1-year interim analysis, the groups did Episiotomy is one of the most prevalent surgical interventions not differ in terms of baseline demographic and obstetric char- at the delivery room, ranging in frequency from <10 to 75% of acteristics. Six advanced perineal tears (3.9%) were diagnosed vaginal births [1, 2]. Presumed benefits http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Urogynecology Journal Springer Journals

No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/no-episiotomy-versus-selective-lateral-mediolateral-episiotomy-De0LFubC7I
Publisher
Springer London
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by The International Urogynecological Association
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Gynecology; Urology
ISSN
0937-3462
eISSN
1433-3023
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00192-017-3480-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis The objective of this trial was to tears was found between groups; however, the main limitation evaluate whether avoiding episiotomy can decrease the risk of of our study was unexpectedly high rates of episiotomy in the advanced perineal tears. nonepisiotomy group. Thus, the main conclusion is that inves- Material and methods In this randomized (1:1) parallel-group tigator monitoring and education should be continuously prac- superiority trial, primiparous women underwent randomiza- ticed throughout the trial duration, stressing the importance of tion into standard care (155 cases) vs. no episiotomy (154 adherence to the protocol. cases) groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of advanced (3rd- and 4th-degree) perineal tears. Secondary out- Keywords Episiotomy Obstetric anal sphincter injury comes included perineal integrity, suturing characteristics, second-stage duration, incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal variables, and various postpartum symptoms 2 days Introduction and 2 months after delivery. Results At prespecified 1-year interim analysis, the groups did Episiotomy is one of the most prevalent surgical interventions not differ in terms of baseline demographic and obstetric char- at the delivery room, ranging in frequency from <10 to 75% of acteristics. Six advanced perineal tears (3.9%) were diagnosed vaginal births [1, 2]. Presumed benefits

Journal

International Urogynecology JournalSpringer Journals

Published: Sep 20, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off