Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
John Robinson, H. Schuman, S. Presser (1982)
Questions and answers in attitude surveys
E. Ziegel (2002)
Generalized Linear ModelsTechnometrics, 44
G. Gasperoni (2004)
S. Rinauro, "Storia del sondaggio d'opinione in Italia, 1936-1994"
S. Sudman, N. Bradburn (1974)
Response Effect in Survey
R. Groves (1979)
Actors and Questions in Telephone and Personal Interview SurveysPublic Opinion Quarterly, 43
D. Leeuw, Edith Desiree (1992)
Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys.
(2008)
Lensvelt-Mulders, G.: Surveying sensitive topics
Michael Weber, M. Denk, Klaus Oberecker, C. Strauss, C. Stummer (2008)
Panel surveys go mobileInt. J. Mob. Commun., 6
E. Leeuw (2008)
Choosing the Method of Data Collection
R. Groves (1990)
Theories and Methods of Telephone SurveysReview of Sociology, 16
E. Leeuw, J. Hox, D. Dillman (2008)
International handbook of survey methodology.
(2006)
Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses and Future Advances
W. Aquilino (1994)
INTERVIEW MODE EFFECTS IN SURVEYS OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL USE: A FIELD EXPERIMENTPublic Opinion Quarterly, 58
E. Pistolesi (2004)
Il parlar spedito. L’italiano di chat, e-mail e SMS.
N. Schwarz, F. Strack, Hans-Jürgen Hippler, George Bishop (1991)
The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurementApplied Cognitive Psychology, 5
M. Pitrone (1995)
La formulazione delle domande: alcuni problemi metodologici
E. Ziegel (1990)
Survey Errors and Survey CostsTechnometrics, 32
F. Kreuter, S. Presser, R. Tourangeau (2008)
Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys The Effects of Mode and Question SensitivityPublic Opinion Quarterly, 72
Arjuna Tuzzi (2001)
Subjects on Using Open and Closed-Ended Questions
L. Bernardi (2005)
Percorsi di Ricerca Sociale
M. Couper (2000)
Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches.Public opinion quarterly, 64 4
V.L. Zammuner (1988)
Tecniche dell’intervista e del questionario
N. Schwarz, S. Sudman (1992)
Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research
(1998)
Collecting sensitive information with different modes of data collection
P. Natale, Nando Pagnoncelli (2001)
Il rapporto tra politici e sondaggi in Italia
P. Natale (2004)
Il sondaggio
Anatol-Fiete Näher, Ivar Krumpal (2012)
Asking sensitive questions: the impact of forgiving wording and question context on social desirability biasQuality & Quantity, 46
R.M. Groves, F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, R. Tourangeau (2004)
Survey Methodology
C. Cannell, N. Bradburn, S. Sudman (1982)
Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77
(1974)
Survey Methodology., European Association of Methodology/Taylor
A. Agresti (1990)
An introduction to categorical data analysis
M.P. Couper (2008)
Designing Effective Web Surveys
P.P. Biemer, L.E. Lyberg (2003)
Introduction to Survey Quality
N. Schwarz, Hans-Jürgen Hippler (1995)
SUBSEQUENT QUESTIONS MAY INFLUENCE ANSWERS TO PRECEDING QUESTIONS IN MAIL SURVEYSPublic Opinion Quarterly, 59
R.M. Groves (1990)
Theories and methods of telephone surveysAnn. Rev. Sociol., 16
R. Tourangeau, T.W. Smith (1998)
Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection
S. Borra, R. Rocci, M. Vichi, M. Schader (2001)
Advances in Classification and Data Analysis
A. Marradi (1997)
Politica e Sondaggi
R. Tourangeau, Ting Yan (2007)
Sensitive questions in surveys.Psychological bulletin, 133 5
S. Rinauro (2002)
Storia del sondaggio d'opinione in Italia, 1936 -1994 : dal lungo rifiuto alla repubblica dei sondaggi
(2008)
Casuale e rappresentativo : ma cosa vuol dire ?
G.F. Bishop, H.J. Hippler, N. Schwarz, F. Strack (1988)
Telephone Survey Methodology
Donald Rugg (1941)
EXPERIMENTS IN WORDING QUESTIONS: IIPublic Opinion Quarterly, 5
George Bishop, Hans-Jürgen Hippler, N. Schwarz, F. Strack (1987)
A comparison of response effects in self-administered and telephone surveys
Questionario e question wording
New opportunities have recently emerged in survey practice, coupled with a need to make changes, and alternative survey data collection modes such as those based on new technologies (for example, the Web and mobile phones) have become a focus of interest. Studies have considered the biases due to data collection modes and to the wording of questions in questionnaires, but they have rarely dealt with the interaction between the two phenomena. This paper presents the results of a study on the interactions between some of the best-known question-wording effects and three data collection modes: face-to-face, Web-based and SMS-based (Short Text Messaging). The results have highlighted some interesting characteristics of the various modes—innovative ones in particular—and have confirmed the existence of potential interactions between data collection modes and question-wording effects. The findings may have significant implications for the study and practice of surveys and entail that, when surveys are designed, account is taken of specific factors associated with the method used to word the questions in questionnaires.
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: May 3, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.