Navigation support not costeffective for CRC screening

Navigation support not costeffective for CRC screening PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 792, p20 - 2 Dec 2017 Navigation support not cost effective for CRC screening Patient navigation support by social workers does not appear to be cost effective for increasing adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in France, according to findings of a study published in Value in Health. In the cluster randomised PRADO study conducted in in northern France between April 2011 and April 2013, 16 250 patients were randomised to the navigation programme for CRC screening, with support by social workers, or to usual screening. The cost effectiveness of the navigation programme was assessed from a payer perspective (French state or French social security system) over the two-year period. Costs of usual screening were not included; direct nonmedical costs of the navigation programme were categorised as navigation costs (for equipment and services) or personnel costs (for navigators and secretarial staff) . The navigation programme significantly increased the overall screening participation rate (24.4% vs 21.1%; p=0.003), but the increase in screening rate was greater in patients with higher socioeconomic status (+4.1%; p=0.01) than in those with low socioeconomic status (+2.6%; p=0.07). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for navigation compared with usual screening was €1212 per additional individual screened, overall, €969 per additional individual screened in patients with high socioeconomic status, and €1527 per additional individual screened in patients with low socioeconomic status. The total cost of the navigator intervention over two years was €321 787, with navigator wages accounting for 70% of the cost. "When the intervention is implemented for the entire population, social inequalities in CRC screening adherence increase. To reduce social inequalities, patient navigation should therefore be restricted to deprived populations, despite not being the most cost- effective strategy, and accepted to bear a higher extra cost per additional individual screened," concluded the researchers. * 2013 euros De Mil R, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Navigation Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening to Reduce Social Health Inequalities: A French Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Value in Health : 10 Nov 2017. Available from: URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.020 803286171 1173-5503/17/0792-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2017 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 2 Dec 2017 No. 792 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News Springer Journals

Navigation support not costeffective for CRC screening

Free
1 page
Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/navigation-support-not-costeffective-for-crc-screening-GkNdBwnCeS
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes; Quality of Life Research; Health Economics; Public Health
ISSN
1173-5503
eISSN
1179-2043
D.O.I.
10.1007/s40274-017-4543-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 792, p20 - 2 Dec 2017 Navigation support not cost effective for CRC screening Patient navigation support by social workers does not appear to be cost effective for increasing adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in France, according to findings of a study published in Value in Health. In the cluster randomised PRADO study conducted in in northern France between April 2011 and April 2013, 16 250 patients were randomised to the navigation programme for CRC screening, with support by social workers, or to usual screening. The cost effectiveness of the navigation programme was assessed from a payer perspective (French state or French social security system) over the two-year period. Costs of usual screening were not included; direct nonmedical costs of the navigation programme were categorised as navigation costs (for equipment and services) or personnel costs (for navigators and secretarial staff) . The navigation programme significantly increased the overall screening participation rate (24.4% vs 21.1%; p=0.003), but the increase in screening rate was greater in patients with higher socioeconomic status (+4.1%; p=0.01) than in those with low socioeconomic status (+2.6%; p=0.07). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for navigation compared with usual screening was €1212 per additional individual screened, overall, €969 per additional individual screened in patients with high socioeconomic status, and €1527 per additional individual screened in patients with low socioeconomic status. The total cost of the navigator intervention over two years was €321 787, with navigator wages accounting for 70% of the cost. "When the intervention is implemented for the entire population, social inequalities in CRC screening adherence increase. To reduce social inequalities, patient navigation should therefore be restricted to deprived populations, despite not being the most cost- effective strategy, and accepted to bear a higher extra cost per additional individual screened," concluded the researchers. * 2013 euros De Mil R, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Navigation Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening to Reduce Social Health Inequalities: A French Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Value in Health : 10 Nov 2017. Available from: URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.020 803286171 1173-5503/17/0792-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2017 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 2 Dec 2017 No. 792

Journal

PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes NewsSpringer Journals

Published: Dec 2, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off