Mouse Chromosome 12

Mouse Chromosome 12 Mammalian Genome 10, 953 (1999). Incorporating Mouse Genome © Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1999 1 2 Peter D’Eustachio, * Roy Riblet ** Department of Biochemistry and Kaplan Cancer Center, NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York NY 10016, USA Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies, 3550 General Atomics Court, San Diego, CA 92121-1122 USA Submitted: 1 December 1998 Introduction Comprehensive primary genetic data for the mouse are provided Reliability of marker placement in the genetic map has been by the Mouse Genome Database (MGD) and several more spe- indicated on a scale from 1 (most reliable) to 3 (least reliable). cialized databases accessible via the World-Wide Web. This report These indications should be viewed cautiously. Marker orders de- is useful as an entry point to allow users to note the genes and termined from patterns of co-segregation within a single cross can markers likely to fall in a physical or genetic sub-region of Chro- be highly reliable, but marker orders determined by interpolation mosome 12, preparatory to a search of MGD and other primary of data from different crosses are often unreliable, even when the resources to retrieve complete data. individual crosses each yielded reliable orders. Data obtained by The genetic organization of Chromosome 12 (Table 1) is following the inheritance of chromosomal rearrangements and largely unchanged: newly mapped markers (noted with asterisks in translocations cytogenetically in a cross segregating for conven- Table 1) have been interpolated into the 62-bin map of Chromosome tional markers present an extreme form of this difficulty, as cross- 12 developed previously (26922) without affecting either the length ing over is strongly perturbed in the vicinity of many rearrange- of the map or the placements of previously well-mapped markers. ments (e.g., 3979). As a result, Robertsonian translocations are assigned to the centromere of the cytogenetic map and bin 0 of the genetic map of Chromosome 12, but with a reliability score of 3, * Committee Chair and all other chromosomal rearrangements are classified as syn- ** Co-Chair tenic, regardless of the amount or quality of available genetic data Correspondence to: P.D’Eustachio concerning the rearrangement. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Mammalian Genome Springer Journals

Mouse Chromosome 12

Free
1 page
Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/mouse-chromosome-12-UTCvovu30D
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
Subject
Life Sciences; Cell Biology; Animal Genetics and Genomics; Human Genetics
ISSN
0938-8990
eISSN
1432-1777
D.O.I.
10.1007/s003359901131
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Mammalian Genome 10, 953 (1999). Incorporating Mouse Genome © Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1999 1 2 Peter D’Eustachio, * Roy Riblet ** Department of Biochemistry and Kaplan Cancer Center, NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York NY 10016, USA Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies, 3550 General Atomics Court, San Diego, CA 92121-1122 USA Submitted: 1 December 1998 Introduction Comprehensive primary genetic data for the mouse are provided Reliability of marker placement in the genetic map has been by the Mouse Genome Database (MGD) and several more spe- indicated on a scale from 1 (most reliable) to 3 (least reliable). cialized databases accessible via the World-Wide Web. This report These indications should be viewed cautiously. Marker orders de- is useful as an entry point to allow users to note the genes and termined from patterns of co-segregation within a single cross can markers likely to fall in a physical or genetic sub-region of Chro- be highly reliable, but marker orders determined by interpolation mosome 12, preparatory to a search of MGD and other primary of data from different crosses are often unreliable, even when the resources to retrieve complete data. individual crosses each yielded reliable orders. Data obtained by The genetic organization of Chromosome 12 (Table 1) is following the inheritance of chromosomal rearrangements and largely unchanged: newly mapped markers (noted with asterisks in translocations cytogenetically in a cross segregating for conven- Table 1) have been interpolated into the 62-bin map of Chromosome tional markers present an extreme form of this difficulty, as cross- 12 developed previously (26922) without affecting either the length ing over is strongly perturbed in the vicinity of many rearrange- of the map or the placements of previously well-mapped markers. ments (e.g., 3979). As a result, Robertsonian translocations are assigned to the centromere of the cytogenetic map and bin 0 of the genetic map of Chromosome 12, but with a reliability score of 3, * Committee Chair and all other chromosomal rearrangements are classified as syn- ** Co-Chair tenic, regardless of the amount or quality of available genetic data Correspondence to: P.D’Eustachio concerning the rearrangement.

Journal

Mammalian GenomeSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off