Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Westen, P. Blagov, K. Harenski, C. Kilts, S. Hamann (2006)
Neural Bases of Motivated Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Emotional Constraints on Partisan Political Judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential ElectionJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18
Staffan Darnolf, Jørgen Elklit (2012)
Electoral malpracticeDemocratization, 19
JA McCann, JI Dominguez (1996)
Democratizing Mexico: Public opinion and electoral choice
David Redlawsk, James McCann (2005)
Popular Interpretations of ‘Corruption’ and their Partisan ConsequencesPolitical Behavior, 27
S Birch (2009)
Handbook of comparative politics
Charles Taber, M. Lodge, Jill Glathar (2001)
The motivated construction of political judgments.
John Sides, K. Lipsitz, Matt Grossmann (2010)
Do Voters Perceive Negative Campaigns as Informative Campaigns?American Politics Research, 38
B. Nyhan, Jason Reifler (2010)
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political MisperceptionsPolitical Behavior, 32
(2003)
Caught in the cross-fire: Defending the cutural theory of gun-risk perception
T. Rudolph (2006)
Triangulating Political Responsibility: The Motivated Formation of Responsibility JudgmentsPolitical Psychology, 27
F. Schaffer (2002)
Might Cleaning Up Elections Keep People Away from the Polls? Historical and Comparative PerspectivesInternational Political Science Review, 23
T. Hartman, A. Newmark (2012)
Motivated Reasoning, Political Sophistication, and Associations between President Obama and IslamPS: Political Science & Politics, 45
R. Alvarez, T. Hall, Susan Hyde (2009)
Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation
A. Campbell, P. Converse, Warren Miller, Donald Stokes (1960)
The American voterAmerican Journal of Psychology, 74
M. Brewer (1979)
In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 86
F. Lehoucq, I. Molina (2002)
Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica
M. Brewer (1999)
The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55
D. Mitchell (2014)
Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Assessing How Timing and Repetition of Scandal Information Affects Candidate EvaluationsPolitical Psychology, 35
M. Sherif, O. Harvey, B. White, W. Hood, C. Sherif (2013)
Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment
C. Ferguson, H. Kelley (1964)
SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN OVEREVALUATION OF OWN-GROUP'S PRODUCT.Journal of abnormal psychology, 69
S. Freud (1933)
New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis
(2010)
The Myth of universal aversion: Public opinion about negativity in American Campaigns
A. Hastorf, H. Cantril (2011)
They saw a game: a case study.Journal of abnormal psychology, 49 1
James McCann, J. Dominguez (1998)
Mexicans React to Electoral Fraud and Political Corruption: an Assessment of Public Opinion and Voting BehaviorElectoral Studies, 17
D. Kahan, Donald Braman, Geoffrey Cohen, John Gastil, P. Slovic (2010)
Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn’t, and Why? An Experimental Study of the Mechanisms of Cultural CognitionLaw and Human Behavior, 34
W. Paris, G. Budapest, H. Konstanz, C. Bristol, K. Oregon, A. Stirling (1972)
An experimental investigation into the formation of intergroup representationsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2
H. Tajfel, M. Billig, R. Bundy, C. Flament (1971)
Social categorization and intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1
B. Fischer (2016)
Lessons Learned.Schizophrenia bulletin, 42 1
DP Redlawsk, JA McCann (2005)
Popular interpretations of ‘corruption’ and their partisan consequencesPolitical Behavior, 27
R. Alvarez, T. Hall, Morgan Llewellyn (2008)
Are Americans Confident Their Ballots Are Counted?The Journal of Politics, 70
F. Schaffer (2008)
The Hidden Costs of Clean Election Reform
(2008)
Correlates of fraud: Studying state election fraud allegations
F. Lehoucq (2003)
ELECTORAL FRAUD: Causes, Types, and ConsequencesAnnual Review of Political Science, 6
D. Kahan, H. Jenkins‐Smith, Donald Braman (2011)
Cultural cognition of scientific consensusJournal of Risk Research, 14
J. Bailey (1997)
Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices.Jorge I. Dominguez , James A. McCannThe Journal of Politics, 59
Sarah Gollust, P. Lantz, P. Ubel (2009)
The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health.American journal of public health, 99 12
Diana Mutz (2011)
Population-Based Survey Experiments
(2010)
Distrust, discontent, anger and partisan rancor
David Redlawsk (2002)
Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision MakingThe Journal of Politics, 64
Charles Taber, M. Lodge (2006)
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political BeliefsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 50
(2008)
Introduction: Studying election fraud
M Lodge, CS Taber (2000)
Elements of reasoning: Understanding and expanding the limits of political rationality
Ziva Kunda (1990)
The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological bulletin, 108 3
M. Lodge, Charles Taber (2000)
Elements of Reason: Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning
James McCann, David Redlawsk (2006)
As Voters Head to the Polls, Will They Perceive a “Culture of Corruption?”PS: Political Science & Politics, 39
CS Taber, M Lodge, J Glathar (2001)
Citizens and politics
TJ Rudolph (2006)
Triangulating political responsibility: The motivated formation of responsibility judgementsPolitical Behavior, 27
M. Billig, H. Tajfel (1973)
Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 3
A. Fried (2006)
Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American LiberalismPerspectives on Politics, 4
H. Tajfel, Michael Billic (1974)
Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behaviorJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10
F. Schaffer (2007)
Elections for Sale: The Causes And Consequences of Vote Buying
S. Birch (2007)
Electoral Systems and Electoral MisconductComparative Political Studies, 40
Benjamin Nyblade, S. Reed (2008)
Who Cheats? Who Loots? Political Competition and Corruption in Japan, 1947–1993American Journal of Political Science, 52
We fielded an experiment in the 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Study testing the theory that motivated reasoning governs reactions to news about misdeeds on the campaign trail. Treated subjects either encountered a fabricated news story involving phone calls with deceptive information about polling times or one involving disappearing yard signs (the offending party was varied at random). Control subjects received no treatment. We then inquired about how the treated subjects felt about dirty tricks in political campaigns and about all subjects’ trust in government. We find that partisans process information about dirty campaign tricks in a motivated way, expressing exceptional concern when the perpetrators are political opponents. However, there is almost no evidence that partisans’ evaluations of dirty political tricks in turn color other political attitudes, such as political trust.
Political Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 31, 2015
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.