More is more? Forest management allocation at different spatial scales to mitigate conflicts between ecosystem services

More is more? Forest management allocation at different spatial scales to mitigate conflicts... Landscape Ecol (2017) 32:2337–2349 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0572-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE More is more? Forest management allocation at different spatial scales to mitigate conflicts between ecosystem services . . . Ta¨hti Pohjanmies Kyle Eyvindson Marı´a Trivin˜o Mikko Mo¨nkko¨nen Received: 17 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 September 2017 / Published online: 3 October 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 Abstract Results The trade-offs between timber production Context Multi-objective management can mitigate and carbon storage appeared less severe and could be conflicts among land-use objectives. However, the mitigated more effectively the larger the planning effectiveness of a multi-objective solution depends on regions were, but the improvements became minor the spatial scale at which land-use is optimized. This is beyond the scale of ‘large forest holding’. The results because the ecological variation within the planning thus indicate that this scale, approximately 100 stands region influences the potential for site-specific prior- or 200 ha, is large enough to effectively mitigate the itization according to the different objectives. conflict between timber production and carbon Objectives We optimized the allocation of forest storage. management strategies to maximize the joint produc- Conclusions Management planning over relatively tion of two conflicting objectives, timber production small forest areas (200 ha) can mitigate http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Landscape Ecology Springer Journals

More is more? Forest management allocation at different spatial scales to mitigate conflicts between ecosystem services

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/more-is-more-forest-management-allocation-at-different-spatial-scales-a6C26i0oYk
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subject
Life Sciences; Landscape Ecology; Ecology; Nature Conservation; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning; Sustainable Development; Environmental Management
ISSN
0921-2973
eISSN
1572-9761
D.O.I.
10.1007/s10980-017-0572-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Landscape Ecol (2017) 32:2337–2349 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0572-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE More is more? Forest management allocation at different spatial scales to mitigate conflicts between ecosystem services . . . Ta¨hti Pohjanmies Kyle Eyvindson Marı´a Trivin˜o Mikko Mo¨nkko¨nen Received: 17 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 September 2017 / Published online: 3 October 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 Abstract Results The trade-offs between timber production Context Multi-objective management can mitigate and carbon storage appeared less severe and could be conflicts among land-use objectives. However, the mitigated more effectively the larger the planning effectiveness of a multi-objective solution depends on regions were, but the improvements became minor the spatial scale at which land-use is optimized. This is beyond the scale of ‘large forest holding’. The results because the ecological variation within the planning thus indicate that this scale, approximately 100 stands region influences the potential for site-specific prior- or 200 ha, is large enough to effectively mitigate the itization according to the different objectives. conflict between timber production and carbon Objectives We optimized the allocation of forest storage. management strategies to maximize the joint produc- Conclusions Management planning over relatively tion of two conflicting objectives, timber production small forest areas (200 ha) can mitigate

Journal

Landscape EcologySpringer Journals

Published: Oct 3, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off