Monovision Versus Multifocality for Presbyopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Monovision Versus Multifocality for Presbyopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized... Adv Ther (2017) 34:1815–1839 DOI 10.1007/s12325-017-0579-7 REVIEW Monovision Versus Multifocality for Presbyopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials . . . ˇ . Lidija Kelava Hrvoje Baric ´ Mladen Bus ˇic ´ Ivan Cima Vladimir Trkulja Received: May 15, 2017 / Published online: July 3, 2017 Springer Healthcare Ltd. 2017 monovision to any multifocality method or ABSTRACT comparing different monovision/multifocality methods to each other that enabled direct or Introduction: Refractive surgery in presbyopia indirect comparisons between particular tends to achieve spectacle independence with monovision and particular multifocality proce- minimal optical disturbances. We compared dures in presbyopic patients undergoing monovision to multifocality procedures cataract-related or unrelated surgery in respect regarding these outcomes. to spectacle independence, unaided binocular Methods: We conducted a systematic review of visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), and published (till November 21, 2016) randomized adverse events. controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any Results: Three trials comparing monovision (monofocal lenses, LASIK) to multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs; Isert refractive or Tecnis diffractive) and 6 comparing other Enhanced content To view enhanced content for this MFIOLs to Tecnis were included (1–12 months article go to http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/ duration). Spectacle independence. All reporting 40A8F0604EF5CA24. trials were of sufficient quality. Directly, pseu- http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Advances in Therapy Springer Journals

Monovision Versus Multifocality for Presbyopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/monovision-versus-multifocality-for-presbyopia-systematic-review-and-uNUxwuDxZJ
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Healthcare Ltd.
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Internal Medicine; Oncology; Cardiology; Rheumatology; Endocrinology; Pharmacology/Toxicology
ISSN
0741-238X
eISSN
1865-8652
D.O.I.
10.1007/s12325-017-0579-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Adv Ther (2017) 34:1815–1839 DOI 10.1007/s12325-017-0579-7 REVIEW Monovision Versus Multifocality for Presbyopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials . . . ˇ . Lidija Kelava Hrvoje Baric ´ Mladen Bus ˇic ´ Ivan Cima Vladimir Trkulja Received: May 15, 2017 / Published online: July 3, 2017 Springer Healthcare Ltd. 2017 monovision to any multifocality method or ABSTRACT comparing different monovision/multifocality methods to each other that enabled direct or Introduction: Refractive surgery in presbyopia indirect comparisons between particular tends to achieve spectacle independence with monovision and particular multifocality proce- minimal optical disturbances. We compared dures in presbyopic patients undergoing monovision to multifocality procedures cataract-related or unrelated surgery in respect regarding these outcomes. to spectacle independence, unaided binocular Methods: We conducted a systematic review of visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), and published (till November 21, 2016) randomized adverse events. controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any Results: Three trials comparing monovision (monofocal lenses, LASIK) to multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs; Isert refractive or Tecnis diffractive) and 6 comparing other Enhanced content To view enhanced content for this MFIOLs to Tecnis were included (1–12 months article go to http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/ duration). Spectacle independence. All reporting 40A8F0604EF5CA24. trials were of sufficient quality. Directly, pseu-

Journal

Advances in TherapySpringer Journals

Published: Jul 3, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off