Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Bagus, D. Howden (2011)
Monetary equilibrium and price stickiness: Causes, consequences and remediesThe Review of Austrian Economics, 24
L. Lachmann (1951)
Human Action—A Treatise On EconomicsSouth African Journal of Economics, 19
G. Selgin (2008)
The Case for a Falling Price Level in a Growing EconomyEconomic Affairs, 17
L. Mises (1949)
Human Action: A Treatise on Economics
W. Hutt (2011)
The Theory of Idle Resources
P. Bagus, D. Howden (2011)
Unanswered Quibbles with Fractional Reserve Free Banking, 3
P. Bagus, D. Howden (2010)
The Term Structure of Savings, the Yield Curve, and Maturity Mismatching
MN Rothbard (1962)
2004 Man, Economy and State
P. Bagus, D. Howden (2011)
Fractional reserve Free Banking : some QuiBBles
Joseph Salerno (2011)
A Reformulation of Austrian Business Cycle Theory in Light of the Financial CrisisERN: Other European Economics: Macroeconomics & Monetary Economics (Topic)
(1962)
2004 Man, Economy and State. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute
G. Selgin (1988)
The Theory of Free Banking: Money Supply Under Competitive Note Issue
J. Rotemberg (1982)
Sticky Prices in the United StatesJournal of Political Economy, 90
Richard Timberlake, G. Selgin (1991)
The Theory of Free Banking: Money Supply under Competitive Note Issue.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23
L Mises (1928)
On the manipulation of money and credit, (trans. and eds.)
P. Bagus, D. Howden (2012)
Still unanswered quibbles with fractional reserve free bankingThe Review of Austrian Economics, 25
(1928)
“ Monetary Stabilization and Cyclical Policy ”
H. Hoppe (2011)
Of Private, Common, and Public Property and the Rationale for Total Privatization, 3
D. Howden (2010)
Knowledge shifts and the business cycle: When boom turns to bustThe Review of Austrian Economics, 23
G Selgin (1997)
Less than zero: The case for a falling price level in a growing economy
L. Yeager (1994)
TAUTOLOGIES IN ECONOMICS AND THE NATURAL SCIENCESEastern Economic Journal, 20
Luther and Salter argue for a regime where aggregate demand is restored by an increase in the money supply in response to an increase in the demand for money. They claim that, 1) monetary equilibrium policy prescriptions do not necessarily rely on sticky prices, 2) Cantillon effects can be neglected without consequence, 3) wealth redistributions from monetary policy are unimportant, 4) monetary disequilibrium theorists strive for a stable price level, 5) fewer price adjustments are necessary in their proposed regime than in ours, 6) savings and saving are equivalent, 7) changes in the composition of savings do not alter time preference, and, 8) in their proposed regime economic calculation is easier than in a 100 % reserve system. All these claims are false. They furthermore misconstrue us as preferring negative quantity adjustments to positive price adjustments. This too is false.
The Review of Austrian Economics – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 3, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.