Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Rudas, R. Zwick (1995)
Estimating the Importance of Differential Item FunctioningJournal of Educational Statistics, 22
C. Clogg, Tamas Rudast, Liwen Xi (1995)
A NEW INDEX OF STRUCTURE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MODELS FOR MOBILITY TABLES AND OTHER CROSS-CLASSIFICATIONSSociological Methodology, 25
C. Dayton (2003)
Applications and computational strategies for the two-point mixture index of fit.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 56 Pt 1
P. Blau, O. Duncan (1967)
The American Occupational Structure
Martin Gibson, R. Little, D. Rubin (1989)
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data.The Statistician, 38
C. Clogg, T. Rudas, S. Matthews (1998)
Analysis of Contingency Tables Using Graphical Displays Based on the Mixture Index of Fit
A. Formann (2000)
Rater agreement and the generalized Rudas-Clogg-Lindsay index of fit.Statistics in medicine, 19 14
A. Formann (2003)
Latent class model diagnostics - a review and some proposalsComput. Stat. Data Anal., 41
D. Knoke, P. Burke (1980)
Log-linear models
M. Knott (2005)
A measure of independence for a multivariate normal distribution and some connections with factor analysisJournal of Multivariate Analysis, 96
T. Rudas (1999)
The mixture index of fit and minimax regressionMetrika, 50
T. Rudas, C. Clogg, B. Lindsay (1994)
A New Index of Fit Based on Mixture Methods for the Analysis of Contingency TablesJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 56
Liwen Xi, B. Lindsay (1996)
A Note on Calculating the π* Index of Fit for the Analysis of Contingency TablesSociological Methods & Research, 25
T. Rudas (2002)
Applied Latent Class Analysis: A Latent Class Approach to Measuring the Fit of a Statistical Model
This paper proposes a general framework for the analysis of survey data with missing observations. The approach presented here treats missing data as an unavoidable feature of any survey of the human population and aims at incorporating the unobserved part of the data into the analysis rather than trying to avoid it or make up for it. To handle coverage error and unit non-response, the true distribution is modeled as a mixture of an observable and of an unobservable component. Generally, for the unobserved component, its relative size (the no-observation rate) and its distribution are not known. It is assumed that the goal of the analysis is to assess the fit of a statistical model, and for this purpose the mixture index of fit is used. The mixture index of fit does not postulate that the statistical model of interest is able to account for the entire population rather, that it may only describe a fraction of it. This leads to another mixture representation of the true distribution, with one component from the statistical model of interest and another unrestricted one. Inference with respect to the fit of the model, with missing data taken into account, is obtained by equating these two mixtures and asking, for different no-observation rates, what is the largest fraction of the population where the statistical model may hold. A statistical model is deemed relevant for the population, if it may account for a large enough fraction of the population, assuming the true (if known) or a sufficiently small or a realistic no-observation rate.
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 23, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.