www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN miR-19a contributes to gefitinib resistance and epithelial mesenchymal transition in non- Received: 16 January 2016 small cell lung cancer cells by Accepted: 6 June 2016 Published: xx xx xxxx targeting c-Met 1 2 3 3 2 2 Xiaonian Cao , Senyan Lai , Fayong Hu , Guodong Li , Guihua Wang , Xuelai Luo , Xiangning 1 2 Fu & Junbo Hu Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is used as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most NSCLC patients inevitably develop gefitinib resistance, and the mechanisms underlying this resistance are not fully understood. In this study, we show that miR-19a is significantly down-regulated in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cell lines compared with gefitinib-sensitive cell lines. In addition, the down-regulation of miR-19a suppressed the expression of epithelial markers but induced the expression levels of mesenchymal markers. A mechanistic analysis revealed that miR-19a regulated c-Met expression by directly targeting the c-Met 3′UTR. Overexpression of miR-19a decreased c-Met expression and re-sensitized gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells in vitro and in vivo. Consistent with the in vitro findings, the miR-19a serum level was significantly decreased in NSCLC patients with acquired gefitinib resistance compared with the level observed prior to the acquisition of resistance in each patient, indicating that miR-19a expression may be a valuable biomarker for the prediction of acquired gefitinib resistance in a clinical setting. Our data demonstrate that the miR-19a/c-Met pathway plays a critical role in acquired resistance to gefitinib and that the manipulation of miR-19a might provide a therapeutic strategy for overcoming acquired gefitinib resistance. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, accounting for nearly 1.6 million deaths per year . The most common type of lung cancer is non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which comprises approximately 80% of all lung cancer cases. Several genetic alterations in NSCLC, including KRAS gene mutations, EGFR gene mutations, and EML4-ALK rearrangements, have been identie fi d. Of these changes, EGFR gene mutations are found in approx - imately 10–28% of NSCLC cases and are common in women and non-smokers in the East Asian population . Most EGFR mutations occur within the kinase domain, leading to the ligand-independent activation of EGFR 3, 4 signaling . Gefitinib, a common tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been approved for patients harboring 5, 6 exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (Leu858Arg) substitution EGFR mutations . This drug improves response rates, delays disease progression, and most importantly, increases overall survival compared with platinum-based com- 7, 8 bination chemotherapy. However, over the course of therapy, many patients experience resistance to TKIs . Currently, several mechanisms of gefitinib resistance have been proposed, including secondary mutations of the EGFR gene at 20 exon (T790M), amplification of c-Met, activation of AXL, activation of EMT, and up-regulation 2, 9–11 of IGF-1R signaling . MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs that bind to specic fi sequences in the 3 ′ untrans- 12, 13 lated region (3′UTR) of target genes, resulting in degradation of mRNA and/or inhibition of translation . Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. Cancer Research Institute, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.H. (email: firstname.lastname@example.org) Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 1 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ A growing body of evidence indicates that miRNAs play an important role in various biological progresses, including cancer cell proliferation, metabolism development, migration, invasion, differentiation, and drug 13–16 resistance . Recently, several studies have reported that miR-19a plays a complex role in NSCLC cells, and its 17, 18 expression correlates with a worse prognosis in NSCLC patients . Furthermore, Flamant et al. reported that miR-19a is a candidate that responds to imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) , indicating that miR-19a may play an important role in the development of resistance to TKIs. In this study, we showed that the serum level of miR-19a was significantly decreased in patients who devel- oped resistance to gefitinib over the course of gefitinib treatment. Down-regulation of miR-19a expression in gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC cell lines led to gefitinib resistance and EMT. The overexpression of miR-19a in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cell lines re-sensitized these cell lines to gefitinib. We found that miR-19a contributes to gefitinib resistance and EMT by directly targeting c-Met expression. Taken together, our findings provide a rationale for the use of miR-19a as a predictive biomarker for gefitinib sensitivity and provide a potential thera- peutic strategy for overcoming gefitinib resistance by targeting miR-19a expression. Materials and Methods Ethics statement. All experimental methods in the current study were approved by the research committee of Tongji Hospital at the Tongji Medical College of the Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The study was performed in accordance with the approved guidelines by the Tongji Hospital Ethics Committee. All patients provided written informed consent. All animal studies were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines by the Tongji Hospital Ethics Committee. Cell culture and antibodies. The human NSCLC cells (HCC827, H1975, A549, Pc9 and Pc9 GR) were maintained in RPMI-1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). To establish the Pc9 GR cell line, Pc9 cells were cultured, and an appropriate dose of gefitinib (0.1 μM) was added. Then, the dead cells were removed by washing, and living cells were retained and cultured in medium containing gefitinib. The gefitinib concentration was gradually increased. When the concentration of gefitinib reached 5 μM, the surviving Pc9 cells were identi- fied as Pc9 GR cells. A549 cells were also treated with gefitinib before transfected with miR-19a and detected its function on migration ability and EMT. The following primary antibodies were used in this study: GAPDH (Santa Cruz, sc-32233); p-Erk1/2 (Cell Ser473 Signaling, 4370 S); Erk1/2 (Cell Signaling, 4695 S); p-Ake (Cell Signaling, 4060 S); Akt (Cell Signaling, 4691 S); c-Met (Abcom, ab51067); E-cadherin (Cell Signaling, 3195 S); Vimentin (Cell Signaling, 5741 S); and N-cadherin (Cell Signaling, 13116 S). miRNA, RNA interference and the lentiviral system. An miR-19a mimic (miR-19a), an miR-19a negative control (miR-NC), an miR-19a inhibitor (Inh-19a), an miR-19a inhibitor negative control (Inh-NC), siRNA duplexes targeting the c-Met gene (si-Met) and an siRNA negative control (si-NC) were purchased from RiboBio (RiboBio Co., Guangzhou, China). The RNA oligonucleotides were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and the medium was replaced 6 h aer t ft ransfection. Final concentrations of 100 nM miR-19a, 100 nM Inh-19a and 100 nM si-Met were used, and the expression levels of miR-19a and c-Met were quantified aer 48 ft h. e len Th tivirus carrying the miR-19a precursor sequence (lv-19a), the empty lentivirus (lv-NC), the antisense miR-19a precursor sequence (anti-19a) and the empty lentivirus (anti-NC) were purchased from (Genechem Co. LTD Shanghai, China). Lv-19a or anti-19a was added to A549 cells (MOI = 100), and a single clone was selected. miR-19a expression was examined in each cell line. RNA isolation and real-time PCR assay. Total mRNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and reverse transcription was performed using an RT-PCR KIT (Fermentas). Real-time PCR was conducted on an iQ5 Multi-color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (TOYOBO, Shanghai, China). The PCRs consisted of 3 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 15 s at 95 °C, annealing for 30 s at 60 °C and a primer extension for 40 s at 68 °C. The relative quantity of miR-19a was normalized to U6, and that of c-Met was normalized to −ΔΔCT GAPDH according to the following equation: RQ = 2^ . To detect miR-19a in serum samples, total RNA was extracted from the serum using the miRNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN). Specific reverse-transcription primers for miR-19a and U6 were purchased from RIBO BIO Company (Guangzhou, China). miR-19a expression was detected using SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix −ΔΔCT and calculated based on the equation RQ = 2^ . All primer sequences are shown in Supplemental Table 1. Cell growth assay. e ce Th lls were cultured in 96-well plates containing 100 µ l of medium before being trans- fected with miR-19a or Inh-19a. Aer 24 ft h, different concentrations of gefitinib were added, and the cells were incubated for another 72 h. Ten microliters of CCK8 was then added to each well, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm aer 1 ft h. The relative cell viability rate was calculated, and all experiments were performed in triplicate. Western blot analysis. Western blot analysis was performed as described previously . Briefly, the cells were treated and collected, and the total cell lysate was denatured and resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gels before being transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Aer b ft locking in 5% skim milk, the membranes were probed with primary antibodies followed by horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies. The membrane was visualized using electrochemiluminescence (ECL; Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA) and exposed to the chemiluminescence instrument. Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 2 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 1. miR-19a expression in NSCLC patient serum samples and cell lines (A). Patients were treated with gefitinib and examined monthly with Computerized Tomographic Scanning (CT). Patients were sensitive to gefitinib at the initial stage and became resistant to gefitinib, which was detected by CT; (B) The expression of miR-19a was detected in patient serum samples. Serum was obtained from fifteen patients prior to oral gefitinib treatment (pre-resistance) and aer t ft hey had developed gefitinib resistance (post-resistance). Total RNA was extracted from the serum using the miRNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN), and the miR-19a level was measured by real-time PCR (**p < 0.01); (C) NSCLC cell viability was measured. HCC827, H1975, A549, Pc9 and Pc9 GR cells were cultured in 96-well plates and treated with different doses of gefitinib for 72 h before measuring cell viability with CCK8; (D) HCC827, H1975, A549, Pc9 and Pc9 GR cells were cultured and harvested; the miR- 19a level was measured by real-time PCR, and its relative fold change was compared to that of U6; HCC827, H1975, A549, Pc9 and Pc9 GR cells were cultured and harvested, the expression levels of miR-19a (D) and c-Met (E, top) were detected, and the expression of c-Met was quantified with GAPDH (E, bottom). Plasmid construction and luciferase activity assay. The 3 ′UTR sequence of c-Met was cloned into the pGL3-basic vector. The 3′ UTR sequence of c-Met was amplified with a specific primer (Supplemental Table 1 ) and inserted into the pGL3-basic vector using restriction enzymes. The binding sites of miR-19a and c-Met 3′ UTR were predicted using the website http://www.microrna.org/microrna/home.do and the miRanda software. The mutation vector of c-Met 3′UTR was constructed using a Fast Mutagenesis System Kit (TRANSGEN BIOTECH, Beijing, China). The luciferase activity assay was performed using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, HEK293A cells of approximately 80% confluence were seeded in 24-well plates. For the c-Met 3′ UTR luciferase reporter assay, 100 ng of wild type or mutant luciferase reporter plasmid was co-transfected with 100 nM miR-19a or 100 nM miR-NC (Inh-19a or Inh-NC) into HEK293A cells in a 24-well plate using Lipofectamine 2000. e Th luciferase activity assay was exam - ined 48 h aer t ft ransfection using the Dual-Luciferase Assay System. The firefly luciferase activity was normalized to the corresponding Renilla luciferase activity. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Cell migration assay. A549 cells were cultured and transfected with miR-19a or miR-NC. After 24 h, the cells were trypsinized, and 10 cells were resuspended in serum-free medium and placed in the upper chamber. e lo Th wer chamber contained 10% FBS, which served as a chemoattractant. The cells were cultured for 12 h, and non-migrating cells were then removed by washing. The migrated cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed in 100% methanol, and stained with crystal violet. The stained cells were viewed under a microscope (200x magni- fication), and the number of migrated cells was counted in five random fields. Clinical sample collection. Procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Huazhong University of Science and Technology Ethics Committee, and a formal form was explained to each subject to ensure full under- standing and consent. The blood samples were obtained from lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations at 19 or 21 exon who were administered gefitinib for treatment (pre-resistance). Patients treated with gefitinib ultimately developed drug resistance (identified by Computerized Tomographic Scanning), and their blood samples were obtained at this point (post-resistance). The miR-19a expression in each sample was examined by real-time PCR. Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 3 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 2. miR-19a overexpression attenuates gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cells (A). Pc9 GR (3000/plate) cells were transfected with miR-19a mimics (miR-19a) or the negative control (miR-NC) at a final concentration of 100 nM. The cells were then treated with different doses of gefitinib for 72 h, and viability was assessed using CCK8; (B) Pc9 GR cells were transfected with miR-19a or miR-NC and treated with 5 μM gefitinib, and apoptosis was then measured by Annexin V-PI aer 48 ft h; (C) Pc9 cells (3000/plate) were transfected with miR- 19a inhibitor (Inh-19a) or the negative control (Inh-NC) at a final concentration of 100 nM before being treated with different doses of gefitinib for 72 h and measuring cell viability using CCK8; (D) Pc9 cells were transfected with Inh-19a or Inh-NC and treated with 0.1 μM gefitinib before measuring apoptosis by Annexin V-PI aer ft 48 h. (The results above were reproducible in three independent experiments, **p < 0.01). Animal studies. All animal studies were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines by the Tongji Hospital Ethics Committee. The cells were cultured, collected, washed and resuspended culture medium (approx- imately 1 × 10 /ml) and then subcutaneously injected into athymic nude mice. Aer e ft ach tumor had reached a macroscopic size, gefitinib (100 mg/kg) was orally administered to each mouse every other day, and each tumor was measured. After 3 weeks, the mice were sacrificed, the tumors were collected, and the tumor weights were measured. The tumor volume was calculated using the following the formula: volume = (length × width )/2, and a tumor growth curve was generated. Statistical analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 10.0 (SPSS Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) statistical software package. The means ± sd were calculated, and a two-tailed Student’s t-test was per- formed using the data analysis tools provided by the software. In all cases, p < 0.05 was considered to indicate significant differences. Results Reduction of miR-19a in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC patients and cell lines. miR-19a was previ- ously reported as a candidate that responds to imatinib mesylate in patients with CML, indicating that miR-19a may play an important role in TKI resistance . To investigate the roles of miR-19a in the development of TKI resistance in NSCLC, we first compared the serum expression of miR-19a in patients who initially harbored TKI-sensitive EGFR mutations to the serum level in the same individual after they had acquired resistance to gefitinib. Patients with gefitinib resistance were identified by computerized tomographic scanning over the course of gefitinib treatment (Fig. 1A). Fifteen patients were recruited to our study, and miR-19a expression significantly decreased when patients acquired gefitinib resistance compared with the pre-resistance levels (Fig. 1B). Next, we examined miR-19a expression in five NSCLC cell lines and its relationship with gefitinib resistance. As shown in Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 3. miR-19a contributes to EMT in NSCLC cells (A). A549 cells were treated with gefitinib (5 μM) and then transfected with miR-19a or miR-NC; aer 24 ft h, cell migration was detected with a transwell assay. Migrated A549 cells were stained with crystal violet (left); miR-19a overexpression significantly decreased cell migration; quantified data are shown on the right. **p < 0.01; (B) A549 cells were treated with gefitinib (5 μM) and then transfected with Inh-19a or Inh-NC; aer 24 ft h, cell migration was detected with a transwell assay, and migrated A549 cells were stained with crystal violet (left); miR-19a down-regulation significantly increased cell migration; quantified data are shown on the right. **p < 0.01; (C) A549 cells were treated with gefitinib (5 μM) and then transfected with Inh-19a or Inh-NC; the cell morphology is shown. The Inh-19a group exhibited spindle-shaped cells and loss of cell-cell contact, which suggested EMT; (D) A549 cells were treated with gefitinib (5 μM) and then transfected with Inh-19a or Inh-NC, and EMT pathway markers were detected by western blotting. Fig. 1C, Pc9 GR and H1975 cells were resistant to gefitinib compared with Pc9 and HCC827 cells. Interestingly, miR-19a expression was significantly lower in Pc9 GR and H1975 cells than in Pc9 and HCC827 cells (Fig. 1D). Moreover, miR-19a expression negatively correlated with c-Met expression (Fig. 1E). Our results indicated that miR-19a may be involved in the development of gefitinib resistance in NSCLC. Overexpression of miR-19a reverses gefitinib resistance in vitro. To confirm that miR-19a contrib- utes to gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cells, we used gain- and loss-of-function approaches in a series of experi- ments. First, we overexpressed miR-19a by transfecting its mimic in Pc9 GR cells (Fig. S4A) and examined the response of Pc9 GR cell to gefitinib. As shown in Fig. 2A and B, miR-19a overexpression inhibited cell prolifer- ation (Fig. 2A) and increased cell apoptosis (Fig. 2B) in response to gefitinib treatment compared with the cells transfected with mimic control. e Th down-regulation of miR-19a in Pc9 cells by transfecting cells with miR-19a inhibitor (Fig. S4B) promoted cell proliferation (Fig. 2C) and decreased cell apoptosis (Fig. 2D) upon gefitinib treatment. Similar results were observed in A549 cells (Fig. S1A–D). Thus, our data suggest that miR-19a plays a critical role in the establishment of gefitinib resistance. Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 5 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 4. miR-19a decreases c-Met expression and blocks its downstream pathway (A,B). Down-regulating miR-19a increased the c-Met protein and mRNA levels. Pc9 cells were treated with gefitinib (0.1 μM) and then transfected with Inh-19a or Inh-NC, aer 48 ft h, c-Met protein (A) and mRNA (B) level were detected; (C,D) overexpressing miR-19a reduced c-Met protein and mRNA level. Pc9 GR cells were treated with gefitinib (1 μM) and then trasfected with miR-19a or miR-NC, c-Met protein (C) and mRNA (D) level were detected aer 48 ft h; (E) miR-19a overexpression blocks the c-Met downstream pathway. Pc9 GR cells were treated with gefitinib (1 μM) and then transfected with miR-19a or miR-NC, and p-Akt and p-Erk levels were measured aer 48 ft h; (F) Down-regulating miR-19a activated the c-Met downstream pathway. Pc9 cells were treated with gefitinib (0.1 μM) and then transfected with Inh-19a or Inh-NC, and the p-Akt and p-Erk levels were measured aer ft 48 h. Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 6 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 5. miR-19a regulates c-Met by targeting its 3′UTR. Schematic representation of the 3′UTR of c-Met with the predicted target site for miR-19a. The mutant site of c-Met 3′UTR is indicated (dotted line); (B,C) Reporter constructs containing the wild-type c-Met 3′UTR were co-transfected into Pc9 cells along with miR- 19a or miR-NC (B) or Ihn-19a or Inh-NC (C); the relative luciferase activity was measured (mean ± sd, n = 3, **p < 0.01). (D,E) Reporter constructs containing the c-Met 3′UTR harboring a mutation at the predicted miR- 19a target sequence were co-transfected into Pc9 cells with miR-19a or miR-NC. The same construct was co- transfected with Inh-19a or Inh-NC; the relative luciferase activity was measured (mean ± sd, n = 3, **p < 0.01). miR-19a contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition in NSCLC cells. Previous studies have 21, 22 reported a correlation between gefitinib resistance and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) . Therefore, we examined the involvement of miR-19a in EMT. Based on this, we treated A549 cells with gefitinib and then detected miR-19a function on cell migration ability and EMT. A549 cells were transfected with miR-19a mimic or inhibitor, and miR-19a expression (Fig. S4C,D) and migration ability was detected in each group. Our results showed that miR-19a overexpression inhibited the ability of A549 cells to migrate (Fig. 3A), whereas reducing miR- 19a expression increased cell migration (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, A549 cells transfected with Inh-19a displayed a spin- dle shape under a microscope and a loss of cell-cell contact (Fig. 3C), indicating that EMT had occurred (Fig. 3C) upon the decrease in miR-19a expression. To confirm the role of miR-19a in EMT, epithelial and mesenchymal markers were evaluated, and the results indicated that the down-regulation of miR-19a inhibited epithelial markers, whereas mesenchymal markers were increased (Fig. 3D). Collectively, our data suggested that decreased miR-19a expression may contribute to NSCLC cell metastasis by increasing cell mobility and migration and promoting EMT. miR-19a decreases c-Met expression and blocks its downstream pathway. c-Met plays an impor- 9, 23 tant role in gefitinib resistance and contributes to EMT in NSCLC cells . Accordingly, we found that c-Met expression negatively correlated with miR-19a expression in 5 NSCLC cell lines, as shown in Fig. 1E. Therefore, we hypothesized that miR-19a might directly target c-Met and contribute to gefitinib resistance and EMT. To test this hypothesis, we first employed The Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) database, and we analyzed the relationship between miR-19a and c-Met in 449 patients with NSCLC adenocarcinoma. We found a significant inverse corre- lation between miR-19a and c-Met (r = −0.2113, p < 0.0001; Fig. S2A). To confirm this relationship, we examined Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 7 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 6. miR-19a reverses gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cells by targeting c-Met (A). A549 cells were transfected with c-Met siRNA (si-Met), and the c-Met protein level was detected with a western blot (left); the cells were transfected with si-Met and treated with gefitinib, and cell viability (right) and apoptosis rate (center) were measured aer 48 ft h; (B) A549 cells were transfected with Inh-19a or co-transfected with Inh-19a and si-Met and treated with different doses of gefitinib for 72 h before measuring cell viability by CCK8; (C) The cells were transfected with Inh-19a or co-transfected with Inh-19a and si-Met and treated with 1 µM gefitinib before examining apoptosis using the Annexin V-PI assay (mean ± sd, n = 3, **p < 0.01); (D) The cells were transfected with Inh-19a or co-transfected with Inh-19a and si-Met; the cell morphology is shown; (E) The cells were transfected with Inh-19a or co-transfected with Inh-19a and si-Met, and the protein levels of c-Met and its downstream pathway effectors were detected in each group. whether miR-19a regulates c-Met expression. Our data showed that the down-regulation of miR-19a by trans- fecting Pc9 cells with miR-19a inhibitor significantly increased c-Met protein and mRNA expression compared with Pc9 cells transfected with inhibitor control (Fig. 4A,B). Whereas, miR-19a overexpression robustly decreased c-Met protein and mRNA expression (Fig. 4C,D). Previous studies have shown that c-Met induces gefitinib resist- ance and EMT by activating the AKT and ERK pathways . To this end, we examined whether miR-19a regulates the c-Met/AKT and ERK pathways in gefitinib-treated cells. The activity of c-Met the pathway was reduced in cells transfected with mimic miR-19a compared with cells transfected with mimic control, as determined by the levels of phosphorylated AKT and ERK (Fig. 4E). The down-regulation of miR-19a resulted in increased levels of phosphorylated AKT and ERK, as shown in Fig. 4F. Similar data were obtained using A549 cells (Fig. S3A–F), suggesting that miR-19a ae ff cts c-Met expression and its down-stream signaling pathways. miR-19a regulates c-Met by targeting its 3′UTR. miRNAs regulate gene expression by targeting their 3′UTR. To investigate whether miR-19a regulates c-Met expression by targeting its 3′UTR, we cloned c-Met 3′UTR sequences that contain the predicted target site (wild type) or mutated sequences (mutant type) of miR- 19a into the pGL3 control vector (Fig. 5A). Our data showed that co-transfecting the 3′UTR of c-Met with miR- 19a mimics significantly decreased the firefly luciferase activity of the reporter with the wild-type 3′ UTR of c-Met (Fig. 5B) but did not ae ff ct the mutant reporter (Fig. 5D). Conversely, co-transfection of miR-19a inhibitor with the 3′UTR of c-Met notably increased the firefly luciferase activity of the reporter with the wild-type 3′ UTR of c-Met (Fig. 5C) but not the mutant reporter (Fig. 5E). These results demonstrated that miR-19a directly targets the 3′UTR of c-Met and regulated the protein and mRNA expression of c-Met in NSCLC cells. miR-19a contributes to gefitinib resistance and EMT via c-Met. To further evaluate whether the effects of miR-19a on gefitinib resistance and EMT are mediated by c-Met, we first knocked down c-Met expres- sion by transfecting small-interfering RNA (siMet) into A549 cells. Reducing c-Met expression significantly Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 8 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 7. miR-19a overcomes gefitinib resistance in vivo . A549 cells were cultured, collected, washed and resuspended in culture medium (approximately 2 × 10 /ml) before being subcutaneously injected into athymic nude mice. Aer e ft ach tumor reached macroscopic size, gefitinib (10 mg/kg) was orally administered to each mouse every other day, and each tumor was measured. The tumor growth curves of four groups for a period of 3 weeks were generated (A,B). Aer 3 w ft eeks, the mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were collected and measured; tumor in photograph (B, top), mean tumor volume (B, center), mean tumor weight (B, bottom) (mean ± sd, n = 8) (C). miR-19a expression in each group was detected by qRT-PCR; the c-Met, p-Akt, p-Erk protein levels were detected with a western blot (D). attenuated gefitinib resistance in A549 cells (Fig. 6A), which corroborated published studies. Next, we employed a “rescue” experiment by co-transfecting A549 cells with an inhibitor of miR-19a (Inh-19a) and siMet. Our data showed that the transfection of Inh-19a increased c-Met expression, and this increase was abrogated by siMet (Fig. 6E). Furthermore, the transfection of Inh-19a up-regulated c-Met and induced get fi inib resistance and EMT, but these effects were reversed when these cells were co-transfected with siMet (Fig. 6B,C and D). Finally, we evaluated c-Met-mediated downstream signaling aer ce ft lls had been co-transfected with Inh-19a and siMet. Our data showed that knocking down miR-19a increased phosphorylated Akt and Erk, and these increases were offset by co-transfecting with siMet (Fig. 6E). These findings showed that the negative regulation of c-Met expression by miR-19a modulates gefitinib resistance and EMT in NSCLC cells. miR-19a overcomes gefitinib resistance in vivo. To further evaluate the role of miR-19a in gefitinib resistance, we established a cell line that stably expressed high or low levels of miR-19a by infection with a lenti- virus that expressed a pre-miR-19a (Lv-19a) or anti-pre-miR-19a (anti-19a) sequence in A549 cells, respectively. Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 9 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ e ce Th lls were cultured, collected, washed and resuspended in culture medium and subcutaneously injected into athymic nude mice. All mice were sacrificed aer 3 w ft eeks, and the tumors were collected and weighed. During tumor development, the tumor volume was measured, and a growth curve was generated, as shown in Fig. 7A. Aer 3 w ft eeks, the mean volume of Lv-19a tumors was significantly reduced compared with the volume of Lv-NC 3 3 tumors (129.89 ± 48.86 mm versus 232.61 ± 62.72 mm , respectively), whereas the mean tumor volume of anti- 19a tumors was significantly increased compared with the volume of anti-NC tumors (457.10 ± 92.98 mm ver- sus 194.15 ± 56.06 mm , respectively; Fig. 7B center). We also evaluated the tumor weight and found that the mean weight of Lv-19a tumors was lower than that of Lv-NC tumors (LV-NC, 0.238 ± 0.058 g versus LV-19a, 0.086 ± 0.073 g, respectively). However, the mean weight of anti-19a tumors was higher than that of anti-NC tum- ors (anti-NC, 0.19 ± 0.052 g versus anti-19a, 0.357 ± 0.069 g, respectively ; Fig. 7B bottom), which was consistent with the observed mean tumor volume. The qRT–PCR results confirmed that miR-19a expression was higher in the Lv-19a group than in the Lv-NC group, whereas miR-19a expression was markedly lower in the anti-19a group than in the control group (Fig. 7C). In addition, we examined the expression of c-Met in each tumor and found that c-Met expression negatively correlated with miR-19a expression in each tumor (Fig. 7D). Discussion miRNAs can be oncogenic or tumor suppressive in human cancers by targeting specic fi genes and consequently play 13, 24 crucial roles in tumorigenesis and drug resistance . Recently, miR-19a was reported to have complex functions in 17, multiple cancers, including NSCLC, bladder cancer, gastric and colorectal cancer, CML and hepatocellular cancer 19, 25–29 . Despite the importance of miR-19a in tumorigenesis, the role of miR-19a in gefitinib resistance in NSCLC patients has not been fully investigated. In the present study, we showed that the serum expression of miR-19a was dramatically down-regulated in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC patients and cell lines compared with gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC patients and cell lines. Interestingly, miR-19a expression negatively correlated with c-Met expression. A mechanistic analysis revealed that miR-19a contributed to gefitinib resistance and EMT in NSCLC cells by targeting c-Met. Specifically, we analyzed 449 NSCLC adenocarcinoma patient samples from the TCGA database and found a negative correlation between miR-19a and c-Met, which was consistent with our observations in cell lines. Previous study reported that miR-19a triggered EMT and promoted cell migration and invasion in lung can- cer cells . However, in our system, we treated NSCLC cells with gefitinib and found that overexpression miR-19a reversed EMT and prohibited cell migration and invasion (Fig. 3). Other studies found that miR-19a increased 30, 31 the levels of phosphorylation of Akt in breast cancer and B-cell lymphomas . But in our study, we found that miR-19a decreased the level of phosphorylation of Akt in NSCLC cells under gefitinib treated (Fig. 4E, Fig. S3E). e diff Th erence above may be attributed to the treatment of gefitinib and different target genes. Currently, the detection of serum miRNA biomarkers has become one of the most important methods to assist 32, 33 with disease diagnosis . The data presented herein support that the serum level of miR-19a is down-regulated in gefitinib-resistant patients compared with gefitinib-sensitive patients. We also analyzed the ability of miR-19a expression to predict the prognosis of NSCLC patients from the TCGA database. To this end, we found that the overexpression of miR-19a predicted a slightly better prognosis, although the difference did not reach significance (Fig. S2B). In future studies, we plan to verify the ability of the serum expression level of miR-19a to predict the prognosis of patients with NSCLC treated with gefitinib in a large sample. c-Met amplification is one of the most important mechanisms that facilitate gefitinib resistance by 9, 34 re-activating the p-Akt and p-Erk pathway in NSCLC . Although c-Met amplification plays an important role in gefitinib resistance, the mechanisms responsible for the overexpression of c-Met in NSCLC cells aer ft gefitinib treatment are not fully understood. We found that miR-19a expression was gradually inhibited as Pc9 cells were treated with gefitinib (Fig. S2C). Furthermore, the expression of miR-19a was robustly decreased in Pc9 GR cells compared with Pc9 cells. Although, the miRnada database shows weak link between miR-19a and c-Met mRNA, we found another seed region of c-Met 3′UTR (between 1280–1287) and miR-19a as shown in Fig. 5A. Also, our data robustly supported that miR-19a significantly decreased c-Met expression (Fig. 4A) and targeted iks 3′UTR directly (Fig. 5). This study is the first to report that miR-19a can regulate c-Met protein and mRNA expression by targeting its 3′UTR, and the role of miR-19a in gefitinib resistance and EMT depends on c-Met. In conclusion, miR-19a contributes to gefitinib resistance and EMT and may serve as a biomarker of gefitinib-resistant patients. miR-19a is a potent regulator of c-Met in NSCLC cells, and introducing miR-19a into NSCLC cells may be a novel therapeutic strategy to reverse resistance to gefitinib. References 1. Torre, L. A. et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65, 87–108, doi:10.3322/caac.21262 (2015). 2. Pao, W. & Chmielecki, J. Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 10, 760–774, doi:10.1038/nrc2947 (2010). 3. Lynch, T. J. et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 350, 2129–2139, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040938 (2004). 4. Paez, J. G. et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304, 1497–1500, doi:10.1126/science.1099314 (2004). 5. Schiller, J. H. et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346, 92–98, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa011954 (2002). 6. Herbst, R. S., Fukuoka, M. & Baselga, J. Gefitinib–a novel targeted approach to treating cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 4, 956–965, doi:nrc1506 (2004). 7. Tan, C. S., Gilligan, D. & Pacey, S. Treatment approaches for EGFR-inhibitor-resistant patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol 16, e447–459, doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00246-6 (2015). 8. Lin, Y., Wang, X. & Jin, H. EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC patients: mechanisms and strategies. Am J Cancer Res 4, 411–435 (2014). 9. Engelman, J. A. et al. MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science 316, 1039–1043, doi:1141478 (2007). Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 10 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ 10. Rho, J. K. et al. MET and AXL inhibitor NPS-1034 exerts efficacy against lung cancer cells resistant to EGFR kinase inhibitors because of MET or AXL activation. Cancer Res 74, 253–262, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1103 (2014). 11. Cortot, A. B. et al. Resistance to irreversible EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors through a multistep mechanism involving the IGF1R pathway. Cancer Res 73, 834–843, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2066 (2013). 12. Filipowicz, W., Bhattacharyya, S. N. & Sonenberg, N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet 9, 102–114, doi:10.1038/nrg2290 (2008). 13. Lin, S. & Gregory, R. I. MicroRNA biogenesis pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 15, 321–333, doi:10.1038/nrc3932 (2015). 14. Chan, B., Manley, J., Lee, J. & Singh, S. R. The emerging roles of microRNAs in cancer metabolism. Cancer Lett 356, 301–308 doi:S0304-3835(14)00599-0 (2015). 15. Zhao, L., Liu, W., Xiao, J. & Cao, B. The role of exosomes and “exosomal shuttle microRNA” in tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Cancer Lett 356, 339–346, doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2014.10.027 (2015). 16. Bouyssou, J. M. et al. Regulation of microRNAs in cancer metastasis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1845, 255–265, doi:10.1016/j. bbcan.2014.02.002 (2014). 17. Li, J. et al. MicroRNA-19 triggers epithelial-mesenchymal transition of lung cancer cells accompanied by growth inhibition. Lab Invest 95, 1056–1070, doi:10.1038/labinvest.2015.76 (2015). 18. Lin, Q. et al. Serum miR-19a expression correlates with worse prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Surg Oncol 107, 767–771, doi:10.1002/jso.23312 (2013). 19. Flamant, S. et al. Micro-RNA response to imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 95, 1325–1333, doi:10.3324/haematol.2009.020636 (2010). 20. Wang, G. et al. Blocking p55PIK signaling inhibits proliferation and induces differentiation of leukemia cells. Cell Death Dier ff 19, 1870–1879, doi:10.1038/cdd.2012.70 (2012). 21. Rho, J. K. et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition derived from repeated exposure to gefitinib determines the sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors in A549, a non-small cell lung cancer cell line. Lung Cancer 63, 219–226, doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.05.017 (2009). 22. Huang, L. & Fu, L. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Acta Pharm Sin B 5, 390–401, doi:10.1016/j. apsb.2015.07.001 (2015). 23. Zhang, W. et al. Down-regulation of CMTM8 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-like changes via c-MET/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling. J Biol Chem 287, 11850–11858, doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.258236 (2012). 24. Garofalo, M. et al. EGFR and MET receptor tyrosine kinase-altered microRNA expression induces tumorigenesis and gefitinib resistance in lung cancers. Nat Med 18, 74–82, doi:10.1038/nm.2577 (2012). 25. Wu, Q. et al. MiR-19a/b modulate the metastasis of gastric cancer cells by targeting the tumour suppressor MXD1. Cell Death Dis 5, e1144, doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.110 (2014). 26. Cellura, D. et al. miR-19-Mediated Inhibition of Transglutaminase-2 Leads to Enhanced Invasion and Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. Mol Cancer Res 13, 1095–1105, doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0466 (2015). 27. Zhang, Y. et al. A systematic investigation based on microRNA-mediated gene regulatory network reveals that dysregulation of microRNA-19a/Cyclin D1 axis confers an oncogenic potential and a worse prognosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. RNA Biol 12, 643–657, doi:10.1080/15476286.2015.1022702 (2015). 28. Feng, Y. et al. miR-19a acts as an oncogenic microRNA and is up-regulated in bladder cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 33, 67, doi:10.1186/PREACCEPT-9242556491295527 (2014). 29. Wang, X. & Chen, Z. MicroRNA-19a functions as an oncogenic microRNA in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting the suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 and mediating STAT3 activation. Int J Mol Med 35, 839–846, doi:10.3892/ijmm.2015.2071 (2015). 30. Olive, V. et al. miR-19 is a key oncogenic component of mir-17-92. Genes Dev 23, 2839–2849, doi:10.1101/gad.1861409 (2009). 31. Li, X. et al. Curcumin modulates miR-19/PTEN/AKT/p53 axis to suppress bisphenol A-induced MCF-7 breast cancer cell proliferation. Phytother Res 28, 1553–1560, doi:10.1002/ptr.5167 (2014). 32. Del Vescovo, V., Grasso, M., Barbareschi, M. & Denti, M. A. MicroRNAs as lung cancer biomarkers. World J Clin Oncol 5, 604–620, doi:10.5306/wjco.v5.i4.604 (2014). 33. I, H. & Cho, J. Y. Lung Cancer Biomarkers. Adv Clin Chem 72, 107–170, doi:10.1016/bs.acc.2015.07.003 (2015). 34. Gelsomino, F. et al. Targeting the MET gene for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 89, 284–299, doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.11.006 (2014). Acknowledgements This study was supported by the following grants: National Natural Science Foundation (No. 81301899 and No. 81372662) and “973” Program (No. 2009CB521802). Author Contributions Junbo Hu and Xiangning Fu designed the experiments. Xiaonian Cao, Senyan Lai Fayong Hu and Guodong Li preformed the experiments. Guihua Wang and Xuelai Luo analyzed the data. Xiaonian Cao wrote the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the manuscript. Additional Information Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Cre- ative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not per- mitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © The Author(s) 2017 S CI en TI f IC R EPORTS | 7: 2939 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-01153-0 11
Scientific Reports – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 7, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera