Metaphor, Blending, and Cultural Variation: A Reply to Camus

Metaphor, Blending, and Cultural Variation: A Reply to Camus Dao (2017) 16:431–435 DOI 10.1007/s11712-017-9565-7 Metaphor, Blending, and Cultural Variation: A Reply to Camus Edward Slingerland Published online: 19 July 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 In a recent article in this journal, Rina Marie Camus (Camus 2017) frames her discussion of cross-cultural variations in the structure and meaning of the archery metaphor as a corrective to what is supposedly my own view of metaphor. Her portrayal of my view is inaccurate and out of date, and since such misconceptions about my work are not uncommon in the field I find myself moved to write a response. It is easiest to begin with an extended citation from the beginning of Camus’ article: One author who vigorously applies contemporary metaphor theories in the study of Chinese texts is Edward Slingerland. I share his concern over the lingering prevalence of the idea that imagistic conceptualizing is a unique feature of Chinese thought that sets it apart from the West (Slingerland 2011:1–4). How- ever, my analysis of the archery metaphor will vary significantly from Slingerland’streatment of terms such as the “Self” (ji 己; shen 身)in the Zhuangzi 莊子 or “effortless action” (wu-wei 無為) in Confucian and Daoist texts as conceptual metaphors (see http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Dao Springer Journals

Metaphor, Blending, and Cultural Variation: A Reply to Camus

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/metaphor-blending-and-cultural-variation-a-reply-to-camus-ALZJ7VRGde
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subject
Philosophy; Non-Western Philosophy; Philosophy of Religion; Religious Studies, general; Ethics; Chinese
ISSN
1540-3009
eISSN
1569-7274
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11712-017-9565-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Dao (2017) 16:431–435 DOI 10.1007/s11712-017-9565-7 Metaphor, Blending, and Cultural Variation: A Reply to Camus Edward Slingerland Published online: 19 July 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 In a recent article in this journal, Rina Marie Camus (Camus 2017) frames her discussion of cross-cultural variations in the structure and meaning of the archery metaphor as a corrective to what is supposedly my own view of metaphor. Her portrayal of my view is inaccurate and out of date, and since such misconceptions about my work are not uncommon in the field I find myself moved to write a response. It is easiest to begin with an extended citation from the beginning of Camus’ article: One author who vigorously applies contemporary metaphor theories in the study of Chinese texts is Edward Slingerland. I share his concern over the lingering prevalence of the idea that imagistic conceptualizing is a unique feature of Chinese thought that sets it apart from the West (Slingerland 2011:1–4). How- ever, my analysis of the archery metaphor will vary significantly from Slingerland’streatment of terms such as the “Self” (ji 己; shen 身)in the Zhuangzi 莊子 or “effortless action” (wu-wei 無為) in Confucian and Daoist texts as conceptual metaphors (see

Journal

DaoSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 19, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off