Dao (2017) 16:431–435 DOI 10.1007/s11712-017-9565-7 Metaphor, Blending, and Cultural Variation: A Reply to Camus Edward Slingerland Published online: 19 July 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 In a recent article in this journal, Rina Marie Camus (Camus 2017) frames her discussion of cross-cultural variations in the structure and meaning of the archery metaphor as a corrective to what is supposedly my own view of metaphor. Her portrayal of my view is inaccurate and out of date, and since such misconceptions about my work are not uncommon in the field I find myself moved to write a response. It is easiest to begin with an extended citation from the beginning of Camus’ article: One author who vigorously applies contemporary metaphor theories in the study of Chinese texts is Edward Slingerland. I share his concern over the lingering prevalence of the idea that imagistic conceptualizing is a unique feature of Chinese thought that sets it apart from the West (Slingerland 2011:1–4). How- ever, my analysis of the archery metaphor will vary significantly from Slingerland’streatment of terms such as the “Self” (ji 己; shen 身)in the Zhuangzi 莊子 or “effortless action” (wu-wei 無為) in Confucian and Daoist texts as conceptual metaphors (see
Dao – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 19, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera