Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Making Nanomaterials Safer by Design?

Making Nanomaterials Safer by Design? Nanoethics (2017) 11:277–281 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0307-4 EDITORIAL Claudia Schwarz-Plaschg & Angela Kallhoff & Iris Eisenberger Received: 11 October 2017 /Accepted: 11 October 2017 /Published online: 30 October 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 Saferbydesign, safe by design,safetybydesign(here- The idea of designing materials and products that do after SbD for all versions): These slightly different terms not impact negatively on human health, animals or the all point towards a concept that has been becoming environment is certainly not the invention of those ap- increasingly relevant for the development and risk assess- plying it to ENM. Engineering design has a long tradition ment of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) in recent years of aiming to design in safe(r) ways, the most relevant [1–6]. The common idea behind these different SbD precursor approaches being ‘benign by design’, ‘preven- terms is to integrate knowledge of nanomaterials’ poten- tion through design’ [2], ‘inherent safety’, ‘green chem- tial adverse effects on human health, animals and the istry’ [4], ‘privacybydesign’ [7], ‘security by design’ environment into the process of designing nanomaterials and principles from drug discovery and development [8]. and nanoproducts—and to engineer these undesirable While nano-related SbD may draw on these existing effects out of the respective materials or http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png NanoEthics Springer Journals

Making Nanomaterials Safer by Design?

Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/springer_journal/making-nanomaterials-safer-by-design-TANVc1z5MQ

References (18)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subject
Philosophy; Ethics; Nanotechnology; Philosophy of Science; Philosophy of Technology
ISSN
1871-4757
eISSN
1871-4765
DOI
10.1007/s11569-017-0307-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Nanoethics (2017) 11:277–281 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0307-4 EDITORIAL Claudia Schwarz-Plaschg & Angela Kallhoff & Iris Eisenberger Received: 11 October 2017 /Accepted: 11 October 2017 /Published online: 30 October 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 Saferbydesign, safe by design,safetybydesign(here- The idea of designing materials and products that do after SbD for all versions): These slightly different terms not impact negatively on human health, animals or the all point towards a concept that has been becoming environment is certainly not the invention of those ap- increasingly relevant for the development and risk assess- plying it to ENM. Engineering design has a long tradition ment of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) in recent years of aiming to design in safe(r) ways, the most relevant [1–6]. The common idea behind these different SbD precursor approaches being ‘benign by design’, ‘preven- terms is to integrate knowledge of nanomaterials’ poten- tion through design’ [2], ‘inherent safety’, ‘green chem- tial adverse effects on human health, animals and the istry’ [4], ‘privacybydesign’ [7], ‘security by design’ environment into the process of designing nanomaterials and principles from drug discovery and development [8]. and nanoproducts—and to engineer these undesirable While nano-related SbD may draw on these existing effects out of the respective materials or

Journal

NanoEthicsSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 30, 2017

There are no references for this article.