Eur J Plast Surg (2003) 26:359 DOI 10.1007/s00238-003-0567-9 EDITOR’S COM MENT Ian T. Jackson Published online: 15 November 2003 Springer-Verlag 2003 This is a nice follow-up of reconstructions of the nipple– purely based on the patient’s medical insurance. Certainly areola complex by Mr. Hussain and his colleagues. The inpatient treatment for this procedure would not be results are, by and large, good and the authors are to be covered. complimented on their honest assessment. This is only an observation, not a criticism. It probably It was the patient management which intrigued me. I illustrates what lies ahead for European plastic surgeons, have presumed the procedure was performed under not a user-friendly situation but certainly a less expensive general anesthesia, and they had a mean hospital stay of one. 3 days (range 1–4). In my own practice, the procedure is performed in the office or the hospital under either Ian T. Jackson straight local anesthesia or sedation and local anesthesia Editor-in-Chief as an outpatient. The decision for hospital or office is This comment refers to the paper which can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-003-0566-x I. T. Jackson ( ) Institute for Craniofacial and Reconstructive Surgery, Fisher Center, Third Floor, 16001 West Nine Mile Road, Southfield, MI 48075, USA e-mail: email@example.com
European Journal of Plastic Surgery – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2003
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud