Many accounts of human action control assume bindings between features of stimuli and responses of individual events. One widely accepted assumption about these bindings is that they do not contain temporal-order represen- tations regarding the integrated elements. Even though several theories either explicitly or implicitly include it, this assumption has never been tested directly. One reason for this lack of evidence is likely that typical stimulus– response binding paradigms are inapt for such a test. Adapting a new paradigm of response–response binding to include order switches between response integration and retrieval, we were able to analyze possible representation of order information in bindings for the first time. Binding effects were identical for intact and switched response orders, indicating that bindings indeed include no temporal-order information. . . . Keywords Action control SR-binding Binary binding Temporal order Many everyday actions, like reaching for your cup of coffee, (Gratton, Coles, & Donchin, 1992), or repetition priming seem to be executed easily and smoothly—most humans like- (Henson et al., 2014). Obviously, stimuli and actions of an ly do not even think about these seemingly simple actions. Yet individual event can arguably be distributed over time. Yet theories on action control suggest that
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 4, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud