220 ELISABETTA RUSPINI change can be greatly enhanced by making more extensive use of longitudinal data. Dynamic data are the necessary empirical basis for a new type of dynamic thinking about the processes of social change (Gershuny, 1998). The possibility of developing research on longitudinal data also builds a ‘bridge’ between ‘quantitative’ and ‘qualitative’ research traditions and enables re-shaping of the concepts of qualitative and quantitative research. The tendency to view the two research traditions as reﬂecting different epistemological positions and divergent paradigms has led to exaggeration of the differences between them. Con- sequently, quantitative and qualitative research are frequently depicted as mutually exclusive models of the social process. While qualitative research presents a process-oriented view of social life, limitations in the data have restricted many quantitative researchers to static, cross- sectional studies with only inference about process. Bryman (1988: 65–66) stated that there is an implicit longitudinal element built into much qualitative research: the general image that the qualitative researcher conveys about the social order is one of interconnection and change. Great emphasis is placed on social life as an interlocking series of events: this emphasis can be seen as a response to the qualitative researcher’s concern to
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 19, 2004
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud