Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Gill (2005)
Hierarchical Linear Models
M. Greene (1981)
President's Column: Acting Towards the FutureEducational Researcher, 10
Richard Light, David Pillemer (1984)
Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1984, xiii+191 ppEducational Researcher, 15
A. S. Bryk, S. W. Raudenbush, R. T. Congdon (1994)
HLM 2/3. Hierarchical linear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs
J. Cornell, C. Mulrow (1999)
Research methodology in the social, behavioral, and life sciences
R. Schwarzer (1988)
Meta-analysis programsBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20
(1994)
HLM 2/3. Hierarchical linear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International
M. Lipsey, David Wilson (2000)
Practical Meta-Analysis
R. J. Light, D. B. Pillemer (1984)
Summing up: The science of reviewing research
L. V. Hedges, I. Olkin (1985)
Statistical methods for meta-analysis
(1999)
Meta-analysis Research methodology in the social, behavioral, and life sciences
R. Lehtonen (2005)
Multilevel Statistical ModelsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 100
H. Cooper, L. Hedges (1995)
The Handbook of Research SynthesisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 37
F. Schmidt, J. Hunter (1989)
Methods of Meta-Analysis
S. Raudenbush, A. Bryk (1985)
Empirical Bayes Meta-AnalysisJournal of Educational Statistics, 10
G. Glass (1976)
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1Educational Researcher, 5
(1995)
MLn command guide
S. Raudenbush (1994)
Random effects models.
The goal of meta-analysis is to integrate the research results of a number of studies on a specific topic. Characteristic for meta-analysis is that in general only the summary statistics of the studies are used and not the original data. When the published research results to be integrated are longitudinal, multilevel analysis can be used for the meta-analysis. We will demonstrate this with an example of longitudinal data on the mental development of infants. We distinguish four levels in the data. The highest level (4) is the publication, in which the results of one or more studies are published. The third level consists of the separate studies. At this level we have knowledge about the degree of prematurity of the group of infants in the specific study. The second level are the repeated measures. We have data about the test age, the mental development, the corresponding standard deviations, and the sample sizes. The lowest level is needed for the specification of the meta-analysis model. Both the way in which the multilevel model has to be specified (the Mln-program is used) as the results will be presented and interpreted.
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 4, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.