Long-term results of craniofacial implantation: a return to methyl methacrylate

Long-term results of craniofacial implantation: a return to methyl methacrylate A variety of materials are currently implanted in the reconstruction of bony defects of the cranial vault. Traditionally, autologous bone demonstrates low rates of resorption, extrusion, and infection. Alloplastic materials are available in nearly unlimited supply and obviate donor site morbidity. One of the earliest alloplastic materials used in cranioplasty was polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), a malleable and inert implant material. More recently, biocompatible cements such as hydroxyapatite cement have gained rapid acceptance. However, our experience has led us to return to PMMA in craniofacial reconstruction because of its excellent cosmetic and functional results in addition to the low incidence of complications. In the last 6 years, we have implanted PMMA in the treatment of craniofacial defects in 30 patients with only one postoperative infection requiring implant removal. Three other minor complications resolved with expectant management. We believe that this low rate of complications was due, in part, to key methods of implant stabilization as well as the use of antibiotic-impregnated implant material. These methods are presented herein and are differentiated based on the use of PMMA for restoration of full-thickness defects versus augmentation of partial-thickness defects or bony deficiencies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Long-term results of craniofacial implantation: a return to methyl methacrylate

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/long-term-results-of-craniofacial-implantation-a-return-to-methyl-QXDzHdY3Hz
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-008-0262-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

References

  • Biomaterials for facial bone augmentation: comparative studies
    Wilson, J; Merwin, GE
  • A technique for rigid fixation of methyl methacrylate cranioplasty: the vault-locking method
    Gibbons, KJ; Hicks, WL; Guterman, LR

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial