Long-term results of craniofacial implantation: a return to methyl methacrylate

Long-term results of craniofacial implantation: a return to methyl methacrylate A variety of materials are currently implanted in the reconstruction of bony defects of the cranial vault. Traditionally, autologous bone demonstrates low rates of resorption, extrusion, and infection. Alloplastic materials are available in nearly unlimited supply and obviate donor site morbidity. One of the earliest alloplastic materials used in cranioplasty was polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), a malleable and inert implant material. More recently, biocompatible cements such as hydroxyapatite cement have gained rapid acceptance. However, our experience has led us to return to PMMA in craniofacial reconstruction because of its excellent cosmetic and functional results in addition to the low incidence of complications. In the last 6 years, we have implanted PMMA in the treatment of craniofacial defects in 30 patients with only one postoperative infection requiring implant removal. Three other minor complications resolved with expectant management. We believe that this low rate of complications was due, in part, to key methods of implant stabilization as well as the use of antibiotic-impregnated implant material. These methods are presented herein and are differentiated based on the use of PMMA for restoration of full-thickness defects versus augmentation of partial-thickness defects or bony deficiencies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Long-term results of craniofacial implantation: a return to methyl methacrylate

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/long-term-results-of-craniofacial-implantation-a-return-to-methyl-QXDzHdY3Hz
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-008-0262-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A variety of materials are currently implanted in the reconstruction of bony defects of the cranial vault. Traditionally, autologous bone demonstrates low rates of resorption, extrusion, and infection. Alloplastic materials are available in nearly unlimited supply and obviate donor site morbidity. One of the earliest alloplastic materials used in cranioplasty was polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), a malleable and inert implant material. More recently, biocompatible cements such as hydroxyapatite cement have gained rapid acceptance. However, our experience has led us to return to PMMA in craniofacial reconstruction because of its excellent cosmetic and functional results in addition to the low incidence of complications. In the last 6 years, we have implanted PMMA in the treatment of craniofacial defects in 30 patients with only one postoperative infection requiring implant removal. Three other minor complications resolved with expectant management. We believe that this low rate of complications was due, in part, to key methods of implant stabilization as well as the use of antibiotic-impregnated implant material. These methods are presented herein and are differentiated based on the use of PMMA for restoration of full-thickness defects versus augmentation of partial-thickness defects or bony deficiencies.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Feb 1, 2012

References

  • Biomaterials for facial bone augmentation: comparative studies
    Wilson, J; Merwin, GE
  • A technique for rigid fixation of methyl methacrylate cranioplasty: the vault-locking method
    Gibbons, KJ; Hicks, WL; Guterman, LR

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off