Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Agha, A. Fowler, C. Herlin, T. Goodacre, D. Orgill (2014)
Use of autologous fat grafting for reconstruction post-mastectomy and breast conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysisEjso, 40
Frederick Loiselle, R. Mahabir, A. Harrop (2008)
Levels of Evidence in Plastic Surgery Research over 20 YearsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 121
A. Becker, A. Blümle, A. Momeni (2013)
Evidence-Based Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Developments over Two DecadesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 132
R. Agha, A. Fowler, C. Herlin, T. Goodacre, D. Orgill (2014)
Use of autologous fat grafting for reconstruction post-mastectomy and breast conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological outcomesJournal of The American College of Surgeons, 219
Jennifer Chuback, T. Varley, B. Yarascavitch, F. Eaves, A. Thoma, M. Bhandari (2013)
The Level of Evidence Presented at Plastic Surgery Meetings: What Do We Have to Learn?Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 131
A. Hirst, R. Agha, D. Rosin, P. McCulloch (2013)
How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action.International journal of surgery, 11 10
R. Agha, D. Cooper, G. Muir (2007)
The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: a systematic review.International journal of surgery, 5 6
R. Agha, B. Gundogan, A. Fowler, T. Bragg, D. Orgill (2014)
The efficacy of the Cook-Swartz implantable Doppler in the detection of free-flap compromise: a systematic review protocolBMJ Open, 4
R. Agha, T. Goodacre, D. Orgill (2013)
Use of autologous fat grafting for reconstruction postmastectomy and breast conserving surgery: a systematic review protocolBMJ Open, 3
D. Sackett, W. Rosenberg, James Gray, Haynes Rb, W. Richardson (2007)
Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't (reprinted from BMJ, vol 312, pg 71-72, 1996)
R. Agha, C. Camm, E. Doganay, E. Edison, M. Siddiqui, D. Orgill (2013)
Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting qualityEuropean Journal of Plastic Surgery, 37
R. Agha, R. Rosin (2010)
Time for a new approach to case reports.International journal of surgery case reports, 1 1
M. Amin, Michael Mabe (2003)
Impact factors: use and abuse.Medicina, 63 4
R. Agha, Seon Lee, Kyung Jeong, A. Fowler, D. Orgill (2016)
Reporting Quality of Observational Studies in Plastic Surgery Needs Improvement: A Systematic ReviewAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 76
F. Eaves, Rod Rohrich (2011)
So you want to be an evidence-based plastic surgeon? A lifelong journey.Aesthetic surgery journal, 31 1
RJ Rohrich, FF Eaves (2011)
So you want to be an evidence-based plastic surgeon? A lifelong journeyPlast Reconstr Surg, 127
D. Sackett, W. Rosenberg, James Gray, Haynes Rb, W. Richardson (1996)
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 312
(2014)
http://www
A. Bhangu, J. Fitzgerald, A. Kolias (2014)
Trainee‐led research collaboratives: a novel model for delivering multi‐centre studiesANZ Journal of Surgery, 84
R. Agha, C. Camm, E. Edison, D. Orgill (2013)
The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery needs improvement: a systematic review.Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 66 4
Daniel Sullivan, K. Chung, F. Eaves, Rod Rohrich (2011)
The level of evidence pyramid: indicating levels of evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery articles.Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 128 1
(2014)
Reporting guidelines for case series [online
S. Post, R. Selles, D. McGrouther, M. Ritt, S.E.R. Hovius, Jan Fridén, E. Walbeehm (2014)
Levels of evidence and quality of randomized controlled trials in hand and wrist surgery: an analysis of two major hand surgery journalsJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 39
Eur J Plast Surg (2016) 39:365–370 DOI 10.1007/s00238-016-1219-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Levels of evidence in plastic surgery—bibliometric trends and comparison with five other surgical specialties 1 2 3 4 Riaz A. Agha & Mariana Devesa & Katharine Whitehurst & Alexander J. Fowler & 5 6 7 8 Robert Coe & Georgina Wellstead & Dennis P. Orgill & Peter McCulloch Received: 29 April 2016 /Accepted: 6 June 2016 /Published online: 18 July 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract LOE (range 3.7 to 10.9 %). By mean LOE, plastic surgery Background Categorising research by level of evidence continues to rank five out of six. (LOE) is an important evidence-based medicine initiative. Conclusions Plastic surgery is tending towards higher levels Our objective was to assess the change in LOEs in plastic of evidence at a slow pace. The specialty must continue to surgery from 2003 to 2013 and compared this with five other drive towards higher levels of evidence. surgical specialties. Level of Evidence: Not ratable. Methods A search for all research articles published in the top . . three general plastic surgery journals (ranked by impact fac- Keywords Evidence-based medicine Levels of evidence tor) was conducted for 2003 and 2013. Articles were
European Journal of Plastic Surgery – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 18, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.