Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2006) 16:109–112 DOI 10.1007/s11160-006-9001-2 Tillmann Benfey Received: 12 March 2006 / Accepted: 15 March 2006 / Published online: 1 July 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Dear Dr. Nielsen, quarter of the Tiwary et al. review is simply an abridged version of my review with virtually no I am writing to express my concern about the close correspondence in content between a recent new information and certainly no additional interpretation. review article published in RFBF (B.K. Tiwary, R. Kirubagaran and A.K. Ray, 2004. The biology At my university we have clear guidelines on of triploid ﬁsh. Reviews in Fish Biology and what deﬁnes plagiarism: ‘‘(1) quoting verbatim or Fisheries 14: 391–402) and a review article of my almost verbatim from a source (such as copy- own (T.J. Benfey, 1999. The physiology and righted material, notes, letters, business entries, behavior of triploid ﬁshes. Reviews in Fisheries computer materials, etc.) without acknowledg- Science 7: 39–67). ment; (2) adopting someone else’s line of thought, Besides introductory and concluding remarks, argument, arrangement, or supporting evidence their paper has ten sections. Of these, three con- (such as, for example, statistics, bibliographies, etc.) without indicating such dependence; (3) secutive sections (‘‘haematology
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 1, 2006
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud