www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Large-scale additive manufacturing with bioinspired cellulosic materials Naresh D. Sanandiya, Yadunund Vijay , Marina Dimopoulou, Stylianos Dritsas & Javier G. Fernandez Received: 17 April 2018 Cellulose is the most abundant and broadly distributed organic compound and industrial by-product Accepted: 23 May 2018 on Earth. However, despite decades of extensive research, the bottom-up use of cellulose to fabricate Published: xx xx xxxx 3D objects is still plagued with problems that restrict its practical applications: derivatives with vast polluting effects, use in combination with plastics, lack of scalability and high production cost. Here we demonstrate the general use of cellulose to manufacture large 3D objects. Our approach diverges from the common association of cellulose with green plants and it is inspired by the wall of the fungus-like oomycetes, which is reproduced introducing small amounts of chitin between cellulose fibers. The resulting fungal-like adhesive material(s) (FLAM) are strong, lightweight and inexpensive, and can be molded or processed using woodworking techniques. We believe this first large-scale additive manufacture with ubiquitous biological polymers will be the catalyst for the transition to environmentally benign and circular manufacturing models. Cellulose and chitin are the first and second most abundant polymers on the surface of the Earth , and conse- 2,3 quently a recurrent topic of research for their potential utilization in manufacture . Typically, cellulose is asso- ciated with plants and chitin with arthropods, however the natural occurrence of both biopolymers as structural components broadens to most kingdoms of eukaryota and bacteria . Despite their abundance, they rarely coap- pear in the same organism. One exception of this are certain species of oomycetes , a large class of eukaryotic organisms. Oomycetes grow in a mycelial form as fungi. However, in contrast to fungi which are characterized by a chitinous wall, oomycetes’ cell walls, and those of their close relative hyphochytrids, are predominately based 4,5 on cellulose . In the last few years, the pathogenic nature of some oomycetes has motivated a meticulous characterization of their wall singularities, as possible targets for disease control . Those studies have also shed some light on the characteristics of natural structures made of chitin and cellulose. This knowledge has direct application on the development of bioinspired materials. We now know oomycetes are not a homogeneous population but a combination of members with at least three distinctive cell wall types . While those walls are mostly composed of cellulose, they also contain low concentrations of chitinous polymers, comprising up to a 10% of the cellulose content . Inspired by this idea we studied the effects on manufacturability of cellulose by the addition of small amounts (<15%) of highly deacetylated chitin (i.e. chitosan) and the influence of the chitinous polymer in the ability of the composite to form three-dimensional structures. The objective of our research is to apply the principles of the cell wall of fungi and oomycetes to produce a general manufacture system based on three premises: (i) e Th resulting bioinspired composite must be made by its natural constituents; (ii) Components must be available and abundant in every habitat on earth; (iii) Cost, envi- ronmental impact, and scalability must enable generalized use. Due to recent research on the oomycetal walls we know that chitin and cellulose produce structural composites in their natural form , without being regenerated, and therefore our criteria (i) and (ii) are theoretically possible. Additionally, both molecules are common indus- 9–12 trial byproducts with a combined cost in the range of commodity plastic , being exceptional, and probably unique, biological candidates to fulfill criterion (iii). Our research focuses on the reproduction of the synergies between molecules in biological composites, and we approach this by artificially associating structural biomolecules in their organization in living systems . This differs from the two predominant approaches to bioinspired materials, based on the reproduction of natural composites with synthetic materials of known manufacturability, and from transforming natural components to fit in already existing manufacture techniques . The later, has given rise to cellulose modified to form ther - moplastic polymers (celluloid), and regenerated to form films (cellophane) or fibers (rayon). These chemical Singapore University of Technology & Design, 8 Somapah Road, 487372, Singapore, Singapore. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.G.F. (email: firstname.lastname@example.org) Scientific REpo R tS | (2018) 8:8642 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-26985-2 1 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 1. Supramolecular organization of fungus-like mimetic materials. (a) Cellulose fibers from plant origin are dispersed in chitosan solution. Aer r ft emoval of the water, chitosan crystallize in between fibers. In the process the sterically available amino groups in chitosan not involved in the crystal conformation react with the free hydroxyl groups on the surface of the cellulose fiber. As the chitosan losses intermolecular water, the polymer crystal reduced volume brings together the cellulosic fibers into a solid composite. (b) Scanning electron microscopic images of the cellulose fibers (left) and their structure in the chitinous composite (12.5% chitosan concentration). (c) X-ray diffraction pattern of the composite and their constituents. The data shows a cellulose I polymorph unaltered during the formation of the composite. A relaxation on the crystal structure, reflected in a shift of the 002 reflection, could be caused for the hydrogen bond of the cellulosic hydroxyl groups with chitosan, reducing the amount of cellulose-cellulose intermolecular hydrogen bonds. (d) FTIR fingerprint −1 of the Chitosan-cellulose composite. The amino groups of the chitosan shifted from 1538 to 1556 cm and −1 the band associated with the hydroxyl groups of the cellulose shifted from 1640 to 1648 cm indicated the interaction between amino groups of chitosan and hydroxyl groups of the cellulose. transformations and dissolutions require strong organic solvents and hazardous pollutants such as acetone, car- bon disulfide, and sulfuric acid . As a result, while some of those variants of cellulose were very popular in the 1970′s, their current use has declined to small niche markets . In contrast with the chemical stability of cellulose, chitin with low degree of acetylation (i.e. chitosan) con- tains enough protonatable groups to enable its dispersion in low concentrations (i.e. 1% v/v) of acetic acid (e.g. table vinegar 4–10%). Chitosan in solution is driven into a liquid crystal by partial removal of the inter- molecular water and in that state we used it as external phase to form colloidal dispersions of cellulose fibers. Further removal of the water molecules results in full crystallization of the chitinous polymer and formation of a solid chitosan-cellulose composite (Fig. 1a). Scanning Electron images reveals the original microscopic fibrous structure of the cellulose in the composite (Fig. 1b), while X-Ray diffraction confirms that the cellulose I crystal conformation is intact (Fig. 1c). The FTIR spectra of the chitosan and cellulose composites reveals the predom- 3,20 inant interaction between the amino and hydroxyl groups respectively (Fig. 1d). Separate phases of the two components are observed at large concentration of chitosan, turning into a homogenous composite, without phase separation, but with a single decomposition temperature when the concentration of chitosan is under 30% of the total weight (Supplementary Fig. 1). Scientific REpo R tS | (2018) 8:8642 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-26985-2 2 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 2. Mechanical characteristics of fungus-like biomimetic materials. (a) Ashby plot showing the distribution of density and stiffness of natural and synthetic material commonly used in manufacture. Those relevant to this study have been highlighted, while the specific function of the fungus-like bioinspired material reported is labeled as “FLAM”. (b) Viscosity in terms of time for composites of variable amounts of chitosan. e hig Th hlighted area represents the range of viscosities suitable for manufacturing techniques, where the material can be extruded, and conform and retain a shape. (c) Determination of the optimal concentration regarding the balance between mechanical properties (tensile strength) and manufacturability (shrinking). (d) 3-point fracture test. Similar to other natural composites, the resulting material is designed for multifunctional structures, balancing strength and stiffness. The 100 × 16 × 6 mm and 3 g FLAM sample shows ductile characteristics; it holds 2.55 kg elastically, aer t ft hat the internal structure starts to deform, resulting in failure when the load reaches 4.37 kg (Supplementary Movie 1). We further explored the manufacturability of the chitin-cellulose fungus-like material by evaluating the ee ff ct of the chitin concentration on the ability of the composite to reach a pliable state and retain shape. Chitosan is introduced in the composite as a water solution. As a result, composites with large amounts of chitosan (>12%) require removal of part of that water until the material reaches a state able to conform and retain a three-dimensional shape (Fig. 2b). After solidification, composites with low amounts of chitosan (< 8%) show slender mechanical properties, attributable to its inability to fully bind the cellulose fibers. In contrast, high amounts of chitosan (>17%) produce strong internal forces as the polymers loses water and shrinks, under- mining the integrity of structure (Fig. 2c). An inherent optimal ratio of 1:8(w/w) chitosan:cellulose, produces a pliable composite, where no removal of water is required, with minimum shrinking and an unexpected low water uptake (Supplementary Fig. 2). Interestingly, recent studies on the oomycete wall draw similar conclusions for the ratios of chitin/cellulose , and also reported an abnormal water uptake on the cell wall when chitin production is disrupted . The fungus-like additive material (FLAM) has a cost of about 2 $/kg and, with a young modulus of 0.26 Gpa and a density of 0.37 g/cm . It is wort noting that while the cost of FLAM is in the range of commodity plastics, is more than ten times lower than those of common filaments for 3D printing, such as PLA and ABS with an average cost of 20–30 $/kg. The mechanical characteristics of FLAM are within the range of natural cel- lulosic composites such as medium to low density woods and high-density foams, commonly used in product design, construction, aviation and automotive industries (Fig. 2a,d, Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 2, and Supplementary Movie 1). Nevertheless, they are significantly different to any characterized natural mate- rial. FLAM is a reproduction of a natural material synthesized at the microscale (i.e. the oomycete wall), so it is probable its characteristics are similar to uncharacterized materials existing only at that scale. The only reported material with almost identical mechanical characteristics to FLAM is high-ending rigid polyurethane foam (i.e. pcf-30), commonly used for production of synthetic bones . While most cellulosic and chitinous natural structures also include other organic and inorganic components, the interaction between cellulose and chitosan has proven sufficient to form solid composites. These interactions are strong enough even in presence of disruptive components, such as lignin or hemicellulose, enabling the for- mation of wood flour-based composites (Fig. 3a). The mechanical characteristics of these wood-based composites are significantly lower than FLAM based on pure cellulose (Supplementary Table 2), yet they enable a general- ization of the technology to many other sources of unprocessed byproducts. In the US for example, 14% of the municipal waste is wood , while industries such as agriculture, food, textile, and paper, produce high amount of waste with high cellulose content. We tested wood flour from three different sources and purities, producing composites and objects with small mechanical differences with respect to the waste source or the manufacture method (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 3, and Supplementary Table 2). This chitinous property of binding cellu - losic composites is retained by FLAM as when FLAM is deposited on wood it naturally forms adhesion bonds able to hold an average of 33.5 ± 7.3 kg per cm (Fig. 3a). This feature broadens the applicability of the material to an unprecedented range of strategies: it can be machined using common woodworking techniques such as sawing and sanding, (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Movie 2) as well as used in combination with hardwood and other cellulosic components (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 4, and Supplementary Movie 3). More interestingly, the Scientific REpo R tS | (2018) 8:8642 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-26985-2 3 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 3. Additive properties of fungus-like materials and their use in woodworking techniques. (a) Adhesion force with respect time following the standard test of adhesion (ASTM D5868) with respect to time. Full strength is achieved aer 1 ft hour, from that point 21 mg of dry FLAM covering an area of 9.3 × 9.3 mm holds the equivalent to 29.02 ± 6.35 kg. This ability of the material to attach to cellulosic composites (included itself ) enables its use in additive manufacturing. (b) Use of FLAM in conventional woodworking techniques. A 4 × 4 × 4 cm FLAM cube is sawn in two halves, one of the halves is then drilled and then sanded down to remove one of the corners. A nail is hammered through the other half. (Supplementary Movie 2) (c) Composites made with different sources of cellulosic materials. Samples one to four (from left) are made of wood byproducts of different qualities and sources, while the right sphere (labeled “CC”) is made of pure cellulose (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). (d) Use of the material in combination with pieces of solid wood to produce a functional chair. All pieces are attached uniquely by the FLAM material. The fungus-like biomimetic material can be casted, 3D printed, molded but also modified using regular woodworking techniques (Supplementary Fig. 4). property of FLAM to bond with cellulosic composites also include fusing with itself, enabling its use in additive manufacturing (Supplementary Fig. 3). Because of its abundance and biodegradability, the use of cellulose in a versatile manufacture approach such as additive manufacturing has broad technological and economic implications . In spite of extensive past and current research to adapt cellulose to 3D printing, progress is still riddled with obstacles such as use of haz- 16,24,25 25 ardous solvents , lyophilizing small cellulosic scaffolds and contamination by mixing the polymer with 26,27 commodity plastics . We developed a large scale 3D printing system specific for FLAM natural materials based on the Direct Ink Writing (DIW) principles (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Figs 3, and 6). Core components include a precision robotic dispensing system and associated design-to-manufacture software tailored for FLAM. To demonstrate the capabilities of the system, we 3D printed a 1.2 m long wind turbine blade (Fig. 4a). e Th blade is comprised on two symmetric inner core parts (Fig. 4c) hollowed to accelerate evaporating hardening and fused together using FLAM. The tribological function of a turbine blade makes it incompatible with the stepped surface produced by additive manufacturing . To improve surface finish and potential aerodynamic performance, the blade was coated by a thin layer of FLAM and subsequently polished (Fig. 4d). Additional coatings with other Scientific REpo R tS | (2018) 8:8642 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-26985-2 4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 4. Additive manufacture of fungus-like materials. (a) Design of the wind turbine blade fully made of FLAM. The inner core of the blade, built by additive manufacturing, is designed to allow ventilation and reduce weight. The outer shell is produced by coating the core with a 3 mm layer of FLAM. Aer dr ft ying the outer shell is sanded down to produce a smooth surface. (b) FLAM material is dispensed through a 7 mm diameter nozzle to form beads and then layers of material. The pressure is controlled by a closed loop system between a high-pressure tank (1.2 MPa) supplying material and an auger screw before the nozzle. Hot air is focused on the extruded layer just aer dep ft osition to accelerate water evaporation. The printing head is mounted on a 20 kg payload six-axis industrial robotic arm with a stationary horizontal reach radius of 1.65 m (Supplementary Fig. 6). (c) FLAM printing of the layers to support the structure of the wind turbine blade. The blade’s core was printed in two halves, each taking about 1 h and 24 h to dry. The average printing speed is of about 50 mm/s and 2.8 cm of FLAM per second (Supplementary Movie 3). Two halves of the inner core are assembled together using FLAM as adhesive agent. (d) The blade is coated by a layer of FLAM manually spread over the inner core. Because the ability of the material to be post processed, imperfections can be removed in post-processing stages. (e) Aer t ft he outer skin is dried, it is sanded down in two steps of decreasing grit. The 1.2 m blade is estimated to be 50% hollow inside and has a weight of 5.28 kg. (Supplementary Movie 4 and Supplementary Fig. 5). materials can be used to add functionality to the surface, such as self-cleaning, reduced air resistance, or water- proofing. FLAM has a density less than one half that of the lightest commercially available 3D printed filament (Polyamide, 0.95 g/cm ), resulting in a lightweight finished blade of 5.28 kg (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. 5, and Supplementary Movie 4). No technology has ever been reported to possess the unique characteristics of FLAM: made of the two most abundant and broadly distributed components on earth, lightweight, cost in the range of commodity plastics, suitable for large-scale manufacture, lack of harmful solvents/pollutants, compatible with cellulosic composites, completely biodegradable out of composting systems. Additionally, to our knowledge, there is no other biotic material with the adaptability to be casted, molded, sanded, sawn and 3D printed. It is expected that FLAM can delocalize general manufacture and meet the emerging needs of sustainable manufacture, large-scale fabrication, and circular economy, as well as be a disruptive technology across multiple industries, including the architec- tural, aerospace, and biomedical, enabling the development of many more areas and new manufacture strategies beyond the current reach of technology. Materials and Methods Materials. High Purity cellulose (JELUCEL HM400X; fiber size < 200 μm) and wood flour- W1 (JELUXYL ® ® WEHO 500; grain size <500 μm) were supplied by JELU-WERK GmbH & Co. KG, Germany. Sawdust- byprod- ucts of the woodwork machines was collected from fabrication lab-SUTD (W2), Singapore. Chitosan used in the manufacturing process was purchased from i-CHESS chemicals Pvt Ltd., India (Table S1). Chitosan (medium molecular weight; 75–85% deacetylated) used for molecular characterization and glacial acetic acid, were pur- chased from Sigma-Aldrich, Singapore. All chemicals were used as received. FLAM preparation: Chitosan solu- tion (3% w/w) was prepared by dissolving chitosan in 1%(v/v) acetic acid. Fungus-like additive materials (FLAM) were prepared by mixing chitosan solution and cellulose (C:C) in varying ratio (dry w/w) 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:6, 1:8 and 1:10, and were used to cast films for molecular characterization, specimens for mechanical characterization and hand-casted structures followed by oven drying at 50 °C. The FLAM to manufacture macrostructures were pre- pared in a 1:8 ratio (C:C) by mixing in an Industrial dough mixer (B25-25L, Yiwu Sneeceman, China) and 90 rpm. Molecular Characterization and imaging. Scanning electron microscopy: The surface morphology of FLAM films was examined using a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM, JEOL, JSM-7600F) at 5 kV accelerating voltage. Samples were mounted onto a carbon tape on an aluminum stub and sputter coated with gold for 30 s. X-ray diffractionmetry: X-ray diffraction diagrams of cellulose and composite films Scientific REpo R tS | (2018) 8:8642 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-26985-2 5 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ were obtained on a X-ray Diffraction System (XRD)- D8 Discover Bruker, using nickel-filtered CuKα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) operated at 40 mA and 40 kV, with a scan speed of 3°/min having set the 2θ angle 2° to 60°. FTIR: FTIR spectra of composite films were obtained using a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer, −1 VERTEX 70 FTIR (Bruker optik GmbH), with a resolution of 4 cm and accumulation of 32 scans between −1 4000 to 400 cm on ATR mode. TGA: Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of samples were carried out on a er Th mogravimetric Analyzer TA Q50, TA instruments, using a temperature ramp from 30 °C to 700 °C at a heat- ing rate of 10 °C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere. Rheological measurements: The flow behaviors of FLAMs were −1 determined by measuring the dynamic shear viscosity with different shear rates (0.05–30 s ) on a Rheometer (HR-2 Discovery Hybrid Rheometer, TA instruments equipped with Environmental Test Chamber), using paral- lel plate geometry (40 mm diameter; 500 μm gap). FLAMs with ratio 1:2, 1:4 and 1:6 were kept in an oven at 50 °C with frequent stirring and viscosity of each sample was measured periodically at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 27 and 30 h, until viscosity reached to the pliable range. Prepared pliable composites were further used for tensile strength and shrinking behavior measurements. Mechanical testing. Tensile strength: FLAMs with optimized pliable viscosities were cast in a dog-bone shape mold with 100 × 16 × 6 mm size in the reduced section. FLAM (CC 1:8) was printed on manufacturing system (Figure S6) of 150 × 12 × 4 mm size (single filaments), 150 × 18 × 4 mm (double filaments) and 150 × 18 × 8 mm (quadruple filaments) size to prepare specimen to evaluate tensile strengths of the printed parts (Figure S3). The cast and printed test specimens were allowed to dry in an oven at 50 °C for 24 h and were subjected to a tensile test adapted from ASTM standards D1037-12, using a UTM (Universal Testing Machine- Instron 5943 and Instron −1 5942) equipped with 1 kN and 100 kN load cell with a cross head speed of 4 mm min at ambient conditions. 3-point bending test: FLAM (CC 1:8) was cast in a mold with 100 × 16 × 6 mm internal size and was also printed of 150 × 12 × 4 mm size (single filaments), 150 × 18 × 4 mm (double filaments) and 150 × 18 × 8 mm (quadru- ple filaments) size followed by drying in an oven at 50 °C for 24 h. The test specimens were tested for the flex- ural test following ASTM standards (D1037–12) on UTM equipped with 3-point flexure test fixtures. A support −1 span of 60 mm and head speed of 4 mm min was used. Compressive strength: FLAM (CC 1:8) was casted in a 50 × 50 × 50 mm acrylic mold and was also printed of same size on manufacturing system followed by drying in an oven at 50 °C. e Th printed cube was sanded with 240 grit before the test was performed. Compression test was −1 performed on UTM equipped with parallel compression fixtures with a cross head speed of 4 mm min . Bulk adhesive strength: Adhesive performance of FLAM (CC 1:8) was analyzed by single-lap shear test in accordance with the ASTM standards D5868−01(2014). Basswood panel of 3 mm thickness was cut into 9.8 mm × 100 mm size with a lesser cutter to prepare adherends. Wet FLAM (ca. 100 mg wet; ~21 mg dry) was applied on the surface of adherends covering 9.8 mm × 9.8 mm area and another adherend was placed on the top clamping it by bulldog clip. Samples were placed in a heating oven at 50 °C to cure and lap-shear was tested to failure on UTM using 1 kN −1 load cell with a cross-head speed of 10 mm min , at ambient condition. Statistical analysis: Experimental data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, with at least triplicate measurements. Moisture absorption measurement. Moisture absorption measurement was carried on completely dried and pre-weighed mold-casted cuboids with the size 30 × 15 × 15 mm. e Th samples were placed in the humidity chamber at 95% humidity at 25 °C for certain time. e m Th oisture absorption (%) was calculated using the following equation (1) MM − wd Moisture absorption (%) = × 100 (1) Here, M is the weight of the dry specimen before placing in humidity chamber and M is the weight aer m ft ois- d w ture absorption at certain time. Additive Manufacturing System. Positioning system: The 3D printing system is comprised of a commer - cial six-axis articulated industrial robot with maximum horizontal reach of 1.65 m and 20 Kg payload at the flange mounted on a purpose design and built hydraulic scissor-lift mobile platform for extending its work envelope horizontally indefinitely and up to 3.7 m vertically (Figure S6). Material Transport System: The FLAM extrusion system is comprised of a commercial stationary 15 L bulk unloading pump system and a precision dispensing unit 1.7 ml/rev at maximum 125 RPM mounted on the robot’s flange driven by smart servo motor. Both units are rated for highly viscous materials up to 20 bar supply pressure, use anti-sheer and anti-pulsation auger screw cavity pump design. Integration Components: Signal interfacing and communication between the robot’s controller and extrusion system uses bespoke Programmable Control Logic sowa ft re and hardware. Miscellaneous electrical and mechanical interfaces between robot and extrusion system such as mounting plates, nozzles and couplings were fabricated at SUTD FabLab. Design and Control Software: Parametric design software was developed for the design of prototypes and blade artifact and translation of design geometry to machine instructions for off-line robot programming. Material compaction vertically and expansion horizontally were encoded to create a pre-set model from design geometry. Subsequently, machine pathing algorithms were created for interior core structure that account for per layer path continuity to reduce start/stopping the dispenser and eliminate artifacts such as tailing, material feed and speed calibration for maximizing production time without inducing bead deformation by dragging, overhang rate to reduce sagging, cross bead overlap for improving horizontal fusion, interior cavity area increase for accelerating evaporative hardening. Process Parameters: The nozzle internal diameter used is 7 mm and layer height 3 mm for interlayer adhesion which results into a capsule shaped bead profile with approx- imately 13 mm width. The flow rate, approximately 2.8 ml/sec with feed rate of 50 mm/sec, were derived from design experiment model. Scientific REpo R tS | (2018) 8:8642 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-26985-2 6 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ References 1. Reiterer, A., Lichtenegger, H., Tschegg, S. & Fratzl, P. Experimental evidence for a mechanical function of the cellulose microb fi ril angle in wood cell walls. Philosophical Magazine A 79, 2173–2184, https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619908210415 (1999). 2. Toivonen, M. et al. Water-Resistant, Transparent Hybrid Nanopaper by Physical Cross-Linking with Chitosan. Vol. 16 (2015). 3. Robles, E., Salaberria, A. M., Herrera, R., Fernandes, S. C. M. & Labidi, J. Self-bonded composite films based on cellulose nanob fi ers and chitin nanocrystals as antifungal materials. Carbohydrate Polymers 144, 41–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.02.024 (2016). 4. Bartnicki-Garcia, S. Cell wall chemistry, morphogenesis, and taxonomy of fungi. Annual review of microbiology 22, 87–108, https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.22.100168.000511 (1968). 5. Lévesque, C. A. Fifty years of oomycetes—from consolidation to evolutionary and genomic exploration. Fungal Diversity 50, 35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-011-0128-7 (2011). 6. Guerriero, G. et al. Chitin Synthases from Saprolegnia Are Involved in Tip Growth and Represent a Potential Target for Anti- Oomycete Drugs. PLOS Pathogens 6, e1001070, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001070 (2010). 7. Mélida, H., Sandoval-Sierra, J. V., Diéguez-Uribeondo, J. & Bulone, V. Analyses of Extracellular Carbohydrates in Oomycetes Unveil the Existence of Three Different Cell Wall Types. Eukaryotic Cell 12, 194–203, https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00288-12 (2013). 8. Hinkel, L. & Ospina-Giraldo, M. D. Structural characterization of a putative chitin synthase gene in Phytophthora spp. and analysis of its transcriptional activity during pathogenesis on potato and soybean plants. Current Genetics 63, 909–921, https://doi. org/10.1007/s00294-017-0687-6 (2017). 9. Hayes, M. In Marine Bioactive Compounds: Sources, Characterization and Applications (ed. Maria Hayes) 115–128 (Springer US, 2012). 10. Figueiredo, J. A., Ismael, M. I., Anjo, C. M. & Duarte, A. P. Cellulose and derivatives from wood and fibers as renewable sources of raw-materials. Topics in current chemistry 294, 117–128 (2010). 11. Nemtsev, S. V., Zueva, O. Y., Khismatullin, M. R., Albulov, A. I. & Varlamov, V. P. Isolation of Chitin and Chitosan from Honeybees. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology 40, 39–43, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:abim.0000010349.62620.49 (2004). 12. Paulino, A. T., Simionato, J. I., Garcia, J. C. & Nozaki, J. Characterization of chitosan and chitin produced from silkworm crysalides. Carbohydrate Polymers 64, 98–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.10.032 (2006). 13. Fernandez, J. G. & Ingber, D. E. Unexpected Strength and Toughness in Chitosan-Fibroin Laminates Inspired by Insect Cuticle. Advanced Materials 24, 480–484, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104051 (2012). 14. Zhakeyev, A. et al. Additive Manufacturing: Unlocking the Evolution of Energy Materials. Advanced Science 4, 1700187, https://doi. org/10.1002/advs.201700187 (2017). 15. Liebert, T. F., Heinze, T. J. & Edgar, K. J. Cellulose Solvents: For Analysis, Shaping and Chemical Modification. Vol. 1033 (American Chemical Society, 2010). 16. French, A. D. et al. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002). 17. Rinaudo, M., Pavlov, G. & Desbrières, J. Influence of acetic acid concentration on the solubilization of chitosan. Polymer 40, 7029–7032, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00056-7 (1999). 18. Fernandez, J. G. & Ingber, D. E. Manufacturing of Large-Scale Functional Objects Using Biodegradable Chitosan Bioplastic. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 299, 932–938, https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201300426 (2014). 19. Park, S., Baker, J. O., Himmel, M. E., Parilla, P. A. & Johnson, D. K. Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnology for Biofuels 3, 10, https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-10 (2010). 20. Xu, Y. X., Kim, K. M., Hanna, M. A. & Nag, D. Chitosan–starch composite film: preparation and characterization. Industrial Crops and Products 21, 185–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.03.002 (2005). 21. Ayers, M. P., Clift, S. E. & Gheduzzi, S. Morsellised sawbones is an acceptable experimental substitute for the in vitro elastic and viscoelastic mechanical characterisation of morsellised cancellous bone undergoing impaction grafting. Medical Engineering & Physics 36, 26–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.08.005 (2014). 22. Staley, B. F. & Barlaz, M. A. Composition of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States and Implications for Carbon Sequestration and Methane Yield. Journal of Environmental Engineering 135, 901–909, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000032 (2009). 23. Martin, J. H. et al. 3D printing of high-strength aluminium alloys. Nature 549, 365, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23894 (2017). 24. Pattinson, S. W. & Hart, A. J. Additive Manufacturing of Cellulosic Materials with Robust Mechanics and Antimicrobial Functionality. Advanced Materials Technologies 2, 1600084, https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201600084 (2017). 25. Li, V. C.-F., Dunn, C. K., Zhang, Z., Deng, Y. & Qi, H. J. Direct Ink Write (DIW) 3D Printed Cellulose Nanocrystal Aerogel Structures. Scientific Reports 7, 8018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07771-y (2017). 26. Murphy, C. A. & Collins, M. N. Microcrystalline cellulose reinforced polylactic acid biocomposite filaments for 3D printing. Polymer Composites, https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24069 (2016). 27. Kumari, R., Ito, H., Takatani, M., Uchiyama, M. & Okamoto, T. Fundamental studies on wood/cellulose-plastic composites: effects of composition and cellulose dimension on the properties of cellulose/PP composite. Journal of Wood Science 53, 470–480, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10086-007-0889-5 (2007). 28. Chrisey, D. B. The Power of Direct Writing. Science 289, 879–881, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5481.879 (2000). 29. Bassett, K., Carriveau, R. & Ting, D. S. K. 3D printed wind turbines part 1: Design considerations and rapid manufacture potential. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 11, 186–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2015.01.002 (2015). Acknowledgements This work was supported by the International Design Center (IDC) at the Singapore University of Technology and Design, the SUTD Digital Manufacturing and Design Centre (DManD), and the National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Cluster (NAMIC). We also thank Markus Hesse from JELU-WERK GmbH & Co. KG for his support with the donation of the cellulosic materials used in this study. Author Contributions S.D. and J.G.F. conceived and supervised the project. N.S. and J.G.F. designed the material and performed the molecular, supramolecular, and mechanical experiments. Y.V., M.D. and S.D. designed and developed the additive manufacturing system. M.D. and N.S. performed the initial test shaping FLAM by mold casting. S.D., J.G.F. and N.S. wrote the manuscript. Additional Information Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26985-2. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Scientific REpo R tS | (2018) 8:8642 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-26985-2 7 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Cre- ative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not per- mitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © The Author(s) 2018 Scientific REpo R tS | (2018) 8:8642 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-26985-2 8
Scientific Reports – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 5, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud