Large and small rearrangements in the evolution of prokaryotic genomes

Large and small rearrangements in the evolution of prokaryotic genomes Relative frequencies of large and small genome rearrangements (inversions and transpositions) in the evolution of prokaryotic genomes can be evaluated using the ratio between the index S (the ratio of the number of identical pairs of neighboring genes in two genomes to the total number of genes in the sample of interest) and 1–6L/n, where L is the mean difference in intergenic distances and n is the number of genes in the sample. The S value uniformly decreases with the fixation of genome rearrangements, while the decrease rate of 1–6L/n is determined by the rearrangement size. Specifically, large inversions and transpositions lead to a dramatic decrease in the index value, while small rearrangements result in an insignificant decrease. The ratio between these indices was computed for twenty pairs of closely related species belonging to different groups of bacteria and archaea. The pairs examined strongly differed in the relative frequency of large and small rearrangements. However, computer simulation showed that the total variation can be reproduced with the same input parameters of the model. This means that the differences observed can be stochastic and can be interpreted without assuming different mechanisms and factors of genome rearrangements for different groups of prokaryotes. Relative frequencies of large and small rearrangements displayed no noticeable correlations with taxonomic position, total rate of rearrangement fixation, habitation conditions, and the abundance of transposons and repetitive sequences. It is suggested that, in some cases, phage activity increases the frequency of large genome rearrangements. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Russian Journal of Genetics Springer Journals

Large and small rearrangements in the evolution of prokaryotic genomes

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/large-and-small-rearrangements-in-the-evolution-of-prokaryotic-genomes-UphET0AkMO
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Pleiades Publishing, Inc.
Subject
Biomedicine; Human Genetics; Microbial Genetics and Genomics; Animal Genetics and Genomics
ISSN
1022-7954
eISSN
1608-3369
D.O.I.
10.1134/S1022795406110123
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Relative frequencies of large and small genome rearrangements (inversions and transpositions) in the evolution of prokaryotic genomes can be evaluated using the ratio between the index S (the ratio of the number of identical pairs of neighboring genes in two genomes to the total number of genes in the sample of interest) and 1–6L/n, where L is the mean difference in intergenic distances and n is the number of genes in the sample. The S value uniformly decreases with the fixation of genome rearrangements, while the decrease rate of 1–6L/n is determined by the rearrangement size. Specifically, large inversions and transpositions lead to a dramatic decrease in the index value, while small rearrangements result in an insignificant decrease. The ratio between these indices was computed for twenty pairs of closely related species belonging to different groups of bacteria and archaea. The pairs examined strongly differed in the relative frequency of large and small rearrangements. However, computer simulation showed that the total variation can be reproduced with the same input parameters of the model. This means that the differences observed can be stochastic and can be interpreted without assuming different mechanisms and factors of genome rearrangements for different groups of prokaryotes. Relative frequencies of large and small rearrangements displayed no noticeable correlations with taxonomic position, total rate of rearrangement fixation, habitation conditions, and the abundance of transposons and repetitive sequences. It is suggested that, in some cases, phage activity increases the frequency of large genome rearrangements.

Journal

Russian Journal of GeneticsSpringer Journals

Published: Nov 7, 2006

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off