Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jason Flindall, Claudia Gonzalez (2014)
Eating interrupted: the effect of intent on hand-to-mouth actions.Journal of neurophysiology, 112 8
E. Roy, L. Kalbfleisch, Delbert Elliott (1994)
Kinematic Analyses of Manual Asymmetries in Visual Aiming MovementsBrain and Cognition, 24
M. Goodale, D. Westwood, A. Milner (2004)
Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action.Progress in brain research, 144
C. Ansuini, Livia Giosa, L. Turella, G. Altoé, U. Castiello (2008)
An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shapingExperimental Brain Research, 185
M. Heath, D. Westwood (2003)
Can a visual representation support the online control of memory-dependent reaching? Evident from a variable spatial mapping paradigm.Motor control, 7 4
Pratik Mutha, K. Haaland, R. Sainburg (2013)
Rethinking Motor Lateralization: Specialized but Complementary Mechanisms for Motor Control of Each ArmPLoS ONE, 8
N. Berthier, R. Clifton, V. Gullapalli, D. Mccall, D. Robin (1996)
Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching.Journal of motor behavior, 28 3
Jason Flindall, J. Doan, Claudia Gonzalez (2014)
Manual asymmetries in the kinematics of a reach-to-grasp actionLaterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 19
Jason Flindall, K. Stone, Claudia Gonzalez (2015)
Evidence for right-hand feeding biases in a left-handed populationLaterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 20
D. Elliott, E. Roy, D. Goodman, R. Carson, R. Chua, B. Maraj (1993)
Asymmetries in the Preparation and Control of Manual Aiming MovementsCanadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47
M. Goodale, L. Jakobson, J. Keillor (1994)
Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movementsNeuropsychologia, 32
A. Kaszniak, D. Chalmers, A. Milner, M. Goodale (1995)
The visual brain in action
W. Hopkins, F. Waal (1995)
Behavioral laterality in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus): Replication and extensionInternational Journal of Primatology, 16
Tucker Tomlinson, R. Sainburg (2012)
Dynamic Dominance Persists During Unsupported ReachingJournal of Motor Behavior, 44
M. Heath, G. Binsted (2007)
Visuomotor Memory for Target Location in Near and Far Reaching SpacesJournal of Motor Behavior, 39
R. Carson, R. Chua, D. Elliott, D. Goodman (1990)
The contribution of vision to asymmetries in manual aimingNeuropsychologia, 28
F. Ferri, G. Campione, Riccardo Volta, Claudia Gianelli, M. Gentilucci (2010)
To me or to you? When the self is advantagedExperimental Brain Research, 203
S. Duff, R. Sainburg (2007)
Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state positionExperimental Brain Research, 179
C. Ansuini, Katya Grigis, S. Massaccesi, U. Castiello (2008)
Breaking the flow of an actionExperimental Brain Research, 192
S. Cavill, P. Bryden (2003)
Development of handedness: Comparison of questionnaire and performance-based measures of preferenceBrain and Cognition, 53
W. Hopkins, Jamie Russell, M. Hook, S. Braccini, S. Schapiro (2005)
Simple Reaching Is Not So Simple: Association Between Hand Use and Grip Preferences in Captive ChimpanzeesInternational Journal of Primatology, 26
W. Hopkins, K. Phillips, Amanda Bania, S. Calcutt, M. Gardner, Jamie Russell, Jennifer Schaeffer, E. Lonsdorf, S. Ross, S. Schapiro (2011)
Hand preferences for coordinated bimanual actions in 777 great apes: implications for the evolution of handedness in hominins.Journal of human evolution, 60 5
R. Oldfield (1971)
The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.Neuropsychologia, 9 1
Jinsung Wang, R. Sainburg (2007)
The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performanceExperimental Brain Research, 178
S. Schaefer, K. Haaland, R. Sainburg (2009)
Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracyNeuropsychologia, 47
Y. Paulignan, V. Frak, I. Toni, M. Jeannerod (1997)
Influence of object position and size on human prehension movementsExperimental Brain Research, 114
A. Grosskopf, J. Kuhtz-Buschbeck (2005)
Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic studyExperimental Brain Research, 168
Yaoping Hu, Roy Eagleson, M. Goodale (1999)
The effects of delay on the kinematics of graspingExperimental Brain Research, 126
C. Hesse, V. Franz (2010)
Grasping remembered objects: Exponential decay of the visual memoryVision Research, 50
K. Stone, Devon Bryant, Claudia Gonzalez (2013)
Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?Experimental Brain Research, 224
P. Boulinguez, V. Nougier, J. Velay (2001)
Manual Asymmetries in Reaching Movement Control. I: Study of Right-HandersCortex, 37
C. Armbrüster, W. Spijkers (2006)
Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement?Motor control, 10 4
Jason Flindall, Claudia Gonzalez (2016)
The destination defines the journey: an examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements.Journal of neurophysiology, 116 5
Umberto Castiello, K. Bennett, G. Stelmach (2004)
Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object sizeExperimental Brain Research, 94
D. Westwood, M. Goodale (2003)
Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.Spatial vision, 16 3-4
R. Marteniuk, C. MacKenzie, M. Jeannerod, S. Athènes, C. Dugas (1987)
Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.Canadian journal of psychology, 41 3
R. Bootsma, R. Marteniuk, C. MacKenzie, F. Zaal (2004)
The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristicsExperimental Brain Research, 98
K. Naish, A. Reader, C. Houston-Price, A. Bremner, N. Holmes (2012)
To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action goal, but observers do not detect these differencesExperimental Brain Research, 225
Jason Flindall, Claudia Gonzalez (2013)
On the Evolution of Handedness: Evidence for Feeding BiasesPLoS ONE, 8
A. Milner, M. Goodale (2008)
Two visual systems re-viewedNeuropsychologia, 46
P. Veazie (2006)
When to combine hypotheses and adjust for multiple tests.Health services research, 41 3 Pt 1
Umberto Castiello, K. Bennett, H. Chambers (1998)
Reach to grasp: the response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and sizeExperimental Brain Research, 120
John Annett, M. Annett, P. Hudson, A. Turner (1979)
The Control of Movement in the Preferred and Non-Preferred Hands*Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31
Jason Flindall, Claudia Gonzalez (2017)
The inimitable mouth: task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precisionExperimental Brain Research, 235
J. Tretriluxana, J. Gordon, C. Winstein (2008)
Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport–grasp coordinationExperimental Brain Research, 188
Richard Carson, David Goodman, Romeo Chua, Digby Elliott (1993)
Asymmetries in the regulation of visually guided aiming.Journal of motor behavior, 25 1
M. Goodale, A. Milner (1992)
Separate visual pathways for perception and actionTrends in Neurosciences, 15
H. Carnahan (1998)
Manual Asymmetries in Response to Rapid Target MovementBrain and Cognition, 37
Britne Shabbott, R. Sainburg (2008)
Differentiating between two models of motor lateralization.Journal of neurophysiology, 100 2
William Hopkins, Allyson Bennett, S. Bales, Jennifer Lee, Jeannette Ward (1993)
Behavioral laterality in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus).Journal of comparative psychology, 107 4
M. Goodale, Y. Hy (2000)
Grasping after a Delay Shifts Size-Scaling from Absolute to Relative MetricsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12
Studies have suggested a left-hemisphere specialization for visually guided grasp-to-eat actions by way of task-dependent kinematic asymmetries (i.e., smaller maximum grip apertures for right-handed grasp-to-eat movements than for right-handed grasp-to-place movements or left-handed movements of either type). It is unknown, however, whether this left-hemisphere/right-hand kinematic advantage is reliant on the dorsal “vision-for-action” visual stream. The present study investigates the kinematic differences between grasp-to-eat and grasp-to place actions performance during closed-loop (i.e., dorsally mediated) and open-loop delay (i.e., ventrally mediated) conditions. Twenty-one right-handed adult participants were asked to reach to grasp small food items to (1) eat them, or (2) place them in a container below the mouth. Grasps were performed in both closed-loop and open-loop delay conditions, in separate sessions. We show that participants displayed the right-hand grasp-to-eat kinematic advantage in the closed-loop condition, but not in the open-loop delay condition. As no task-dependent kinematic differences were found in ventrally mediated grasps, we posit that the left-hemisphere/right-hand advantage is dependent on dorsal stream processing.
Experimental Brain Research – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 27, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.