Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Gregory Casey (1976)
Popular Perceptions of Supreme Court RulingsAmerican Politics Research, 4
Richard Brisbin, (1996)
Slaying the Dragon: Segal, Spaeth and the Function of Law in Supreme Court Decision MakingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 40
R. Fiscus (1991)
Of Constitutions & Constitutional InterpretationPolity, 24
H. Jacob (1967)
Law, politics, and the federal courts
J. Segal, H. Spaeth (1996)
Norms, Dragons, and Stare Decisis: A ResponseAmerican Journal of Political Science, 40
H. Stumpf (1966)
The Political Efficacy of Judicial SymbolismWestern Political Quarterly, 19
J. Segal, H. Spaeth (1993)
The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model
W. Murphy, J. Tanenhaus (1968)
Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime ChangesLaw & Society Review, 2
D. Jaros, Robert Roper (1980)
The U.S. Supreme CourtAmerican Politics Research, 8
T. L. Becker (1964)
Political Behavioralism and Modern Jurisprudence
J. Tanenhaus, W. Murphy (1981)
Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court: a Panel StudyThe Journal of Politics, 43
John Kessel (1966)
Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court, 10
Dan Kastner, J. Tanenhaus, W. Murphy (1973)
Public evaluations of constitutional courts, alternative explanations
D. Adamany, J. Grossman (1983)
SUPPORT FOR THE SUPREME COURT AS A NATIONAL POLICYMAKERLaw & Policy, 5
J. Knight, L. Epstein (1996)
The Norm of Stare DecisisAmerican Journal of Political Science, 40
R. H. Bork (1990)
The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law
Walter Murphy, J. Ely (1981)
Constitutional Interpretation: Text, Values, and Processes@@@Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review.Reviews in American History, 9
Gregory Casey (1974)
The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical InvestigationLaw & Society Review, 8
John Scheb (2000)
The myth of legality and public evaluation of the Supreme CourtSocial Science Quarterly, 81
Gregory Caldeira, J. Gibson (1992)
The Eti-ology of Public Support for the Supreme Court
J. Gibson, Gregory Caldeira, V. Baird (1998)
On the Legitimacy of National High CourtsAmerican Political Science Review, 92
W. Murphy, J. Tanenhaus (1968)
PUBLIC OPINION AND SUPREME COURT: THE GOLDWATER CAMPAIGNPublic Opinion Quarterly, 32
J. Segal, H. Spaeth (1996)
The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court JusticesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 40
R. Handberg, W. Maddox (1982)
Public Support for the Supreme Court in the 1970sAmerican Politics Research, 10
Gregory Caldeira (1986)
Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme CourtAmerican Political Science Review, 80
Kenneth Dolbeare, P. Hammond (1968)
THE POLITICAL PARTY BASIS OF ATTITUDES TOWARD THE SUPREME COURTPublic Opinion Quarterly, 32
This article examines the mass public's perceptions of the factors that actually influence Supreme Court decisions as well those that ought to influence such decisions. We expect significant discrepancies between what the public believes ought to be the case and what it perceives to actually be the case with regard to Supreme Court decision making and that these discrepancies have a significant negative impact on the public's assessment of the Court. More specifically, we hypothesize that the public believes that political factors have more influence on the Court than “ought” to be the case and that the public perceives traditional legal factors to be less influential than they should be. We find that the expected discrepancies do exist and significantly detract from popular regard for the Court.
Political Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 3, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.