Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Julia D’Souza, J. Jacob, K. Ramesh (2000)
The Use of Accounting Flexibility to Reduce Labor Renegotiation Costs and Manage EarningsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 30
Reza Espahbodi, Michelle Hamer (1996)
On the robustness of the results of adoption date choice studies: The case of pension accountingReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 6
Chris Hogan, Debra Jeter (1999)
Industry Specialization by AuditorsEar and Hearing, 18
R. Watts, J. Zimmerman (2006)
Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective
Robert McGee (1984)
Accounting for Income TaxesCommon U.S. GAAP Issues Facing Accountants
E. Amir, Amir Ziv (1997)
Recognition, Disclosure, or Delay: Timing the Adoption of SFAS No. 106Journal of Accounting Research, 35
Thomas Fields, Thomas Lys, Linda Vincent (2001)
Empirical Research on Accounting ChoiceHistory of Accounting eJournal
M. Zmijewski, R. Hagerman (1981)
An income strategy approach to the positive theory of accounting standard setting/choiceJournal of Accounting and Economics, 3
Melbinger Ms (1989)
The other shoe drops--FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issues its proposed statement on employers' accounting for postretirement medical benefits.Employee benefits journal, 14
T Fields, T Lys, L Vincent (2001)
Empirical research on accounting choiceJ Account Econ, 31
Julia D’Souza (1998)
Rate-regulated enterprises and mandated accounting changes: The case of electric utilitiesAccounting review: A quarterly journal of the American Accounting Association, 73
Ashiq Ali, Krishna Kumar (1994)
The magnitudes of financial statement effects and accounting choice: The case of the adoption of SFAS 87☆Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18
Armen Hovakimian, T. Opler, S. Titman (2001)
The Debt-Equity ChoiceJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36
K. Ramesh, L. Revsine (2000)
The Effects of Regulatory and Contracting Costs on Banks' Choice of Accounting Method for Other Postretirement Employee BenefitsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 30
R. Ball (1980)
Discussion Of Accounting For Research And Development Costs - The Impact On Research And Development ExpendituresJournal of Accounting Research, 18
Hassan Espahbodi, E. Strock, H. Tehranian (1991)
Impact on equity prices of pronouncements related to nonpension postretirement benefitsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 14
J. Maher (1996)
Perceptions of postretirement benefit obligations by bond rating analystsReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 6
Steven Henning, W. Shaw (2003)
Is the Selection of the Amortization Period for Goodwill a Strategic Choice?Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 20
E. Amir (1998)
The Effect of Accounting Aggregation on the Value-Relevance of Financial Disclosures: The Case of SFAS No. 106
S. Balsam, I. Haw, Steven Lilien (1995)
Mandated accounting changes and managerial discretionJournal of Accounting and Economics, 20
E Amir, J Livnat (1996)
Multiperiod analysis of adoption motives: the case of SFAS No. 106Account Rev, 71
L. Weiss, M. Klass (1986)
Regulatory reform : what actually happened
J D’Souza (1998)
Rate-regulated enterprises and mandated accounting changes: the case of electric utilities and post-retirement benefits other than pensions (SFAS No. 106)Account Rev, 73
Benjamin Ayers (1998)
Deferred Tax Accounting Under SFAS No. 109: An Empirical Investigation of its Incremental Value-relevance Relative to APB No. 11
Paul Chaney, Debra Jeter (1994)
The Effect of Deferred Taxes on Security PricesJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 9
E Amir (1993)
The market valuation of accounting information: the case of post-retirement benefits other than pensionsAccount Rev, 68
R. Watts, J. Zimmerman (2006)
Positive Accounting Theory
We provide insight into an argument that firms minimize the costs imposed by new accounting standards through their adoption choices. Focusing on two standards with potentially large impacts on both balance sheet and income statement accounts for many firms, we present evidence that firms chose their strategies for SFAS No. 106 (OPEB) and 109 (DTAX) jointly rather than separately. We also provide insight into how firms view recurring versus non-recurring charges, and how they weigh the tradeoff between a large one-time (income decreasing) charge against the smaller, but longer lasting effects of amortization.
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 26, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.