Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Sherif, H. Cantril (1946)
The psychology of attitudes.Psychological review, 53
D. Schmitt (2005)
Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human matingBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 28
A. H. Eagly (1987)
Sex differences social behavior: a social-role analysis
A. Eagly (1987)
Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation
Mary Johannesen-Schmidt, A. Eagly (2002)
Another Look at Sex Differences in Preferred Mate Characteristics: The Effects of Endorsing the Traditional Female Gender RolePsychology of Women Quarterly, 26
M. Kalmijn (1994)
Assortative Mating by Cultural and Economic Occupational StatusAmerican Journal of Sociology, 100
Jacob Cohen, P. Cohen, S. West, L. Aiken (1979)
Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
P. Glick, Jeffrey Diebold, Barbara Bailey-Werner, Lin Zhu (1997)
The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward WomenPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23
D. Kenrick, Melanie Trost, Jill Sundie (2004)
Sex Roles as Adaptations: An Evolutionary Perspective on Gender Differences and Similarities.
L. Thurstone (1950)
The Measurement of Attitudes.
S. Gangestad, J. Simpson (2000)
The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralismBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 23
A. Eagly, A. Beall, R. Sternberg (2004)
The psychology of gender, 2nd ed.
A. Eagly, W. Wood, A. Diekman (2000)
Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal.
P. Glick, S. T. Fiske (1999)
The ambivalence toward men inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about menPsychology of Women Quarterly, 23
M. Sweeney (2002)
Two Decades of Family Change: The Shifting Economic Foundations of MarriageAmerican Sociological Review, 67
B. Morgan (1996)
Putting the feminism into feminism scales: Introduction of a Liberal Feminist Attitude and Ideology Scale (LFAIS)Sex Roles, 34
(2006)
Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Beliefs About Men
L. Thurstone, E. Chave
The Measurement Of Attitude
M. Wiederman, E. Allgeier (1992)
Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation?☆Ethology and Sociobiology, 13
J. A Simpson, B. Campbell, E. Berscheid (1986)
The association between romantic love and marriage: Kephart (1967) twice revisitedPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12
A. Eagly, W. Wood (1987)
The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
D. Kenrick, R. Keefe (1992)
Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategiesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 15
M. Braga, Duca Pg (1988)
[Exploratory data analysis].La Medicina del lavoro, 79 2
D. Geary (2000)
Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment.Psychological bulletin, 126 1
R. Darlington (1990)
Regression and Linear Models
Donald Symons (1989)
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 culturesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 12
N. Koyama, A. McGain, R. Hill (2004)
Self-reported mate preferences and “feminist” attitudes regarding marital relationsEvolution and Human Behavior, 25
J. Simpson, B. Campbell, Ellen Berscheid (1986)
The Association between Romantic Love and MarriagePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12
J. Church (2001)
Human Development ReportJournal of Government Information, 28
(1945)
Campus values in mate-selection
Peter Glick, S. Fiske (2001)
An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.The American psychologist, 56 2
R. Mare (1991)
Five decades of educational assortative mating.American Sociological Review, 56
T. Eckes, H. Trautner (2000)
The developmental social psychology of gender
Peter Glick, S. Fiske, B. Adetoun, Annetje Brunner, Tineke Willemsen, K. Chipeta, B. Dardenne, A. Dijksterhuis, Miguel Moya, Hyun-Jeong Kim, M. Lameiras, Maria Sotelo, Angelica Mucchi-Faina, Myrna Romani, Nuray Sakalh, Bola Udegbe, Maria Ferreira, Wilson Lopez (2000)
Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures.Journal of personality and social psychology, 79 5
J. Townsend (1989)
Mate selection criteria. A pilot studyEthology and Sociobiology, 10
A. Muller (2006)
Human Development Report 2006
J. Myers, A. Well (1991)
Research Design and Statistical Analysis
M. Kalmijn (1998)
Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends.Annual review of sociology, 24
P. Glick, M. Lameiras, S. Fiske, T. Eckes, B. Masser, C. Volpato, A. Manganelli, J. Pek, Li-li Huang, Nuray Sakallı-Uğurlu, Y. Castro, Maria Pereira, T. Willemsen, Annetje Brunner, Iris Six-Materna, R. Wells, P. Glick (2004)
Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 86 5
T. Kasser, Y. Sharma (1999)
Reproductive Freedom, Educational Equality, and Females' Preference for Resource-Acquisition Characteristics in MatesPsychological Science, 10
A. Eagly, W. Wood, Mary Johannesen-Schmidt (2004)
Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: Implications for the Partner Preferences of Women and Men.
Pam Flaskrud, Kari Dietzler, Ingrid Niehans, J. Jenkins, M. McClellan, David Rivas, A. Cobb, Richard Silva, J. Honikman, R. Grace, Amanda Casarjian, S. Lemon, D. Goldstein, Maria Wilson, Lauren Yurfest (2001)
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
R. Dodhia (2005)
A Review of Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.)Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30
D. T. Kenrick, M. R. Trost, J. M. Sundie (2004)
The psychology of gender
Social role theory (Eagly, Wood, & Diekman, 2000) predicts that traditional gender ideology is associated with preferences for qualities in a mate that reflect a conventional homemaker-provider division of labor. This study assessed traditional gender ideology using Glick and Fiske's (1996, 1999) indexes of ambivalent attitudes toward women and men and related these attitudes to the sex-typed mate preferences of men for younger mates with homemaker skills and of women for older mates with breadwinning potential. Results from a nine-nation sample revealed that, to the extent that participants had a traditional gender ideology, they exhibited greater sex-typing of mate preferences. These relations were generally stable across the nine nations.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 27, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.