Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Margaret Stockdale (1998)
The Direct and Moderating Influences of Sexual-Harassment Pervasiveness, Coping Strategies, and Gender on Work-Related OutcomesPsychology of Women Quarterly, 22
W. Simon, J. Gagnon (1986)
Sexual scripts: Permanence and changeArchives of Sexual Behavior, 15
A. Malamut, L. Offermann (2001)
Coping with sexual harassment: personal, environmental, and cognitive determinants.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 6
P. Corr, C. Jackson (2001)
Dimensions of perceived sexual harassment: effects of gender, and status/liking of protagonistPersonality and Individual Differences, 30
H. H. Kelley (1972)
Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior
L. Fitzgerald, S. Shullman (1993)
Sexual Harassment: A Research Analysis and Agenda for the 1990sJournal of Vocational Behavior, 42
Laurie Rudman, E. Borgida, B. Robertson (1995)
Suffering in Silence: Procedural Justice Versus Gender Socialization Issues in University Sexual Harassment Grievance ProceduresBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 17
T. P. Sbraga, W. O'Donohue (2000)
Sexual harassmentAnnual Review of Sex Research, 11
E. Peirce, B. Rosen, Tammy Hiller (1997)
Breaking the Silence: Creating User-Friendly Sexual Harassment PoliciesEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10
Caroline Cochran, P. Frazier, A. Olson (1997)
Predictors of Responses to Unwanted Sexual AttentionPsychology of Women Quarterly, 21
L. Brooks, A. Perot (1991)
Reporting Sexual Harassment: Exploring a Predictive ModelPsychology of Women Quarterly, 15
S. Kenig, John Ryan (1986)
Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campusSex Roles, 15
S. Tangri, M. Burt, L. Johnson (1982)
Sexual Harassment at Work: Three Explanatory ModelsJournal of Social Issues, 38
D. T. Gilbert, P. S. Malone (1995)
The correspondence biasPsychological Bulletin, 117
L. Fitzgerald, M. Gelfand, F. Drasgow (1995)
Measuring Sexual Harassment: Theoretical and Psychometric AdvancesBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 17
V. Magley (2002)
Coping with sexual harassment: reconceptualizing women's resistance.Journal of personality and social psychology, 83 4
Christopher Hunter, Kent McClelland (1991)
Honoring accounts for sexual harassment: A factorial survey analysisSex Roles, 24
K. Rospenda, J. Richman, Stephanie Nawyn (1998)
DOING POWERGender & Society, 12
D. Peterson (1989)
Interpersonal goal conflict.
B. Gutek, M. Koss (1993)
Changed Women and Changed Organizations: Consequences of and Coping with Sexual HarassmentJournal of Vocational Behavior, 42
Julie Woodzicka, M. LaFrance (2001)
Real Versus Imagined Gender HarassmentJournal of Social Issues, 57
Donna Benson, Gregg Thomson (1982)
SEXUAL HARASSMENT ON A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS: THE CONFLUENCE OF AUTHORITY RELATIONS, SEXUAL INTEREST AND GENDER STRATIFICATION*Social Problems, 29
T. Jones, Martin Remland, C. Brunner (1987)
Effects of Employment Relationship, Response of Recipient and Sex of Rater on Perceptions of Sexual HarassmentPerceptual and Motor Skills, 65
J. Sigal, Jane Braden-Maguire, Ivy Patt, Carl Goodrich, C. Perrino (2003)
Effects of Type of Coping Response, Setting, and Social Context on Reactions to Sexual HarassmentSex Roles, 48
L. Fitzgerald, Alayne Ormerod (1991)
Perceptions of Sexual Harassment: The Influence of Gender and Academic ContextPsychology of Women Quarterly, 15
Margaret Judicibus, M. McCabe (2001)
Blaming the Target of Sexual Harassment: Impact of Gender Role, Sexist Attitudes, and Work RoleSex Roles, 44
Kenneth York (1989)
Defining Sexual Harassment in Workplaces: A Policy-Capturing ApproachAcademy of Management Journal, 32
Carol Baird, N. Bensko, P. Bell, W. Viney, W. Woody (1995)
Gender Influence on Perceptions of Hostile Environment Sexual HarassmentPsychological Reports, 77
K. Smirles (2004)
Attributions of Responsibility in Cases of Sexual Harassment: The Person and the Situation1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34
D. Knapp, R. Faley, S. Ekeberg, Cathy Dubois (1997)
Determinants of Target Responses to Sexual Harassment: A Conceptual FrameworkAcademy of Management Review, 22
J. Gruber, Michael Smith (1995)
Women's Responses to Sexual Harassment: A Multivariate AnalysisBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 17
For personal use only--not for distribution. The Correspondence Bias
L. Fitzgerald, S. Swan, Karla Fischer (1995)
Why Didn't She Just Report Him? The Psychological and Legal Implications of Women's Responses to Sexual HarassmentJournal of Social Issues, 51
L. Ross (1977)
Advances in experimental social psychology
J. E. Gruber (1989)
How women handle sexual harassment: A literature reviewSociology and Social Research, 74
S. Osman (2004)
Victim Resistance: Theory and Data on Understanding Perceptions of Sexual HarassmentSex Roles, 50
T. Jones, Martin Remland (1992)
Sources of variability in perceptions of and responses to sexual harassmentSex Roles, 27
K. M. Rospenda, J. A. Richman, S. J. Nawyn (1998)
Doing power: The confluence of gender, race, and class in contrapower sexual harassmentGender and Society, 12
H. Kelley (1972)
Causal schemata and the attribution process
D. R. Peterson (1988)
Goal concepts in personality and social psychology
B. Gutek (1987)
Sex and the workplace
L. Fitzgerald, M. Hesson-McInnis (1989)
The dimensions of sexual harassment: A structural analysisJournal of Vocational Behavior, 35
Charlotte Krol⊘kke (1998)
Women Professors' Assertive-Empathic and Non-Assertive Communication in Sexual Harassment SituationsWomen's Studies in Communication, 21
E. Jones, R. Nisbett (1972)
The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior.
L. Rubin, S. Borgers (1990)
Sexual harassment in universities during the 1980sSex Roles, 23
P. Berger, T. Luckmann (1966)
The social construction of reality
Walid Afifi, Josephine Lee (2000)
Balancing instrumental and identity goals in relationships: The role of request directness and request persistence in the selection of sexual resistance strategiesCommunication Monographs, 67
J. Henry, J. Meltzoff (1998)
Perceptions of Sexual Harassment as a Function of Target's Response Type and Observer's SexSex Roles, 39
Inger Jensen, B. Gutek (1982)
Attributions and Assignment of Responsibility in Sexual HarassmentJournal of Social Issues, 38
Juanita Firestone, R. Harris (2003)
Perceptions of Effectiveness of Responses to Sexual Harassment in the US Military, 1988 and 1995Gender, Work and Organization, 10
In this study, we used an interactive perspective to address the issue of responses to sexual harassment. We examined the effect of the consistency across time, consistency across types of advances, and assertiveness of a rejecting response on its perceived effectiveness. Participants were presented with scenarios that described responses to unwanted sexual attention and were required to rate the effectiveness of the responses for their clarity, content, and estimated effect on the future behavior of the perpetrator. The results show significant effects of consistency across time, consistency across types of advances, and assertiveness on perceived effectiveness of the response. As expected, an assertive response that was consistent across time and types of advances was perceived to be the most effective. This effect was found to be stronger for women than for men.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.