Is Einstein’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Ψ-Epistemic?

Is Einstein’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Ψ-Epistemic? Axiomathes https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-018-9382-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Is Einstein’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Ψ‑Epistemic? 1 1 1 Vincenzo Fano  · Giovanni Macchia  · Gino Tarozzi Received: 26 November 2017 / Accepted: 20 May 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Harrigan and Spekkens (Found Phys 40:125–157, 2010), introduced the influential notion of an ontological model of operational quantum theory. Ontologi - cal models can be either “epistemic” or “ontic.” According to the two scholars, Ein- stein would have been one of the first to propose an epistemic interpretation of quan - tum mechanics. Pusey et al. (Nat Phys 8:475–478, 2012) showed that an epistemic interpretation of quantum theory is impossible, so implying that Einstein had been refuted. We discuss in detail Einstein’s arguments against the standard interpretation of QM, proving that there is a misunderstanding in Harrigan and Spekkens’ attribu- tion of an epistemic perspective to Einstein, whose point of view was actually statis- tical, but in a quasi-classical sense. Keywords Einstein · Harrigan and Spekkens · Incompleteness · Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph · Quantum state There have been many attempts to realistically interpret the wave function: many worlds, Bohmian, GRW at least (Albert and Ney 2013). None of these are generally accepted or devoid of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Axiomathes Springer Journals

Is Einstein’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Ψ-Epistemic?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/is-einstein-s-interpretation-of-quantum-mechanics-epistemic-ID3Lgynq6f
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
Subject
Philosophy; Philosophy, general; Ontology; Linguistics, general; Cognitive Psychology; Logic
ISSN
1122-1151
eISSN
1572-8390
D.O.I.
10.1007/s10516-018-9382-6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Axiomathes https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-018-9382-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Is Einstein’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Ψ‑Epistemic? 1 1 1 Vincenzo Fano  · Giovanni Macchia  · Gino Tarozzi Received: 26 November 2017 / Accepted: 20 May 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Harrigan and Spekkens (Found Phys 40:125–157, 2010), introduced the influential notion of an ontological model of operational quantum theory. Ontologi - cal models can be either “epistemic” or “ontic.” According to the two scholars, Ein- stein would have been one of the first to propose an epistemic interpretation of quan - tum mechanics. Pusey et al. (Nat Phys 8:475–478, 2012) showed that an epistemic interpretation of quantum theory is impossible, so implying that Einstein had been refuted. We discuss in detail Einstein’s arguments against the standard interpretation of QM, proving that there is a misunderstanding in Harrigan and Spekkens’ attribu- tion of an epistemic perspective to Einstein, whose point of view was actually statis- tical, but in a quasi-classical sense. Keywords Einstein · Harrigan and Spekkens · Incompleteness · Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph · Quantum state There have been many attempts to realistically interpret the wave function: many worlds, Bohmian, GRW at least (Albert and Ney 2013). None of these are generally accepted or devoid of

Journal

AxiomathesSpringer Journals

Published: Jun 5, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off