Is drug-induced sedation endoscopy surgical decision-making process objective and systematic?

Is drug-induced sedation endoscopy surgical decision-making process objective and systematic? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2017) 274:3545–3546 DOI 10.1007/s00405-017-4544-5 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Is drug-induced sedation endoscopy surgical decision-making process objective and systematic? 1,2 1,3 1,4,5 Esuabom Dijemeni  · Gabriele D’Amone  · Israel Gbati   Received: 7 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 March 2017 / Published online: 24 March 2017 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 Dear Editor, The second key observation is the article presented a robust and systematic surgical decision-making process. We have read with great interest the article “The impor- Tables 3 and 4 in the article presented the airway obstruc- tance of drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) tech- tion classification in awake and sedated sleep state, AHI niques in surgical decision making: conventional versus preoperative, surgical procedures and AHI postoperative. target controlled infusion techniques—a prospective ran- This is one of the most objective and systematic reported domized controlled study and a retrospective surgical out- sleep surgical decision-making processes we have noticed comes analysis” by De Vito et al. [1]. in the literature. We will like to start by congratulating the authors on The third key observation is the article systematically publishing a landmark research focussed on addressing the showed Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) sedation Endos- objective and systematic nature of surgical decision-mak- copy (TCI-DISE) technique performed http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Springer Journals

Is drug-induced sedation endoscopy surgical decision-making process objective and systematic?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/is-drug-induced-sedation-endoscopy-surgical-decision-making-process-IHMi3R05Ak
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Otorhinolaryngology; Neurosurgery; Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN
0937-4477
eISSN
1434-4726
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00405-017-4544-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2017) 274:3545–3546 DOI 10.1007/s00405-017-4544-5 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Is drug-induced sedation endoscopy surgical decision-making process objective and systematic? 1,2 1,3 1,4,5 Esuabom Dijemeni  · Gabriele D’Amone  · Israel Gbati   Received: 7 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 March 2017 / Published online: 24 March 2017 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 Dear Editor, The second key observation is the article presented a robust and systematic surgical decision-making process. We have read with great interest the article “The impor- Tables 3 and 4 in the article presented the airway obstruc- tance of drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) tech- tion classification in awake and sedated sleep state, AHI niques in surgical decision making: conventional versus preoperative, surgical procedures and AHI postoperative. target controlled infusion techniques—a prospective ran- This is one of the most objective and systematic reported domized controlled study and a retrospective surgical out- sleep surgical decision-making processes we have noticed comes analysis” by De Vito et al. [1]. in the literature. We will like to start by congratulating the authors on The third key observation is the article systematically publishing a landmark research focussed on addressing the showed Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) sedation Endos- objective and systematic nature of surgical decision-mak- copy (TCI-DISE) technique performed

Journal

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-LaryngologySpringer Journals

Published: Mar 24, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off