Is data needed from every field to determine in-season precision nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat?

Is data needed from every field to determine in-season precision nitrogen recommendations in... The research reported here seeks to determine whether it is necessary to obtain optical reflectance measurements with a GreenSeeker® handheld sensor from each field to make accurate in-season nitrogen application recommendations for winter wheat, and how much precision—and profit—would be lost by moving from site-specific (or field-specific) optical reflectance sampling to region-level sampling. The approach used was to estimate a separate linear response-plateau regression every year using yield and optical reflectance data from randomized complete block experiments. Profits from region-level sampling and field-level sampling were statistically indistinguishable, but this result was mostly due to both being imprecise. Furthermore, the region- and field-based sampling systems were no better than break-even with the historical extension advice to apply preplant anhydrous ammonia at 90 kg ha−1. The approach of estimating a new regression every year is too imprecise, whether at the field or region level. This research goes beyond past research by accounting for the uncertainty in the estimated relationships. The poor performance of the systems is directly related to the imprecise relationship between yield and optical reflectance responses to nitrogen. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Precision Agriculture Springer Journals

Is data needed from every field to determine in-season precision nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/is-data-needed-from-every-field-to-determine-in-season-precision-Jl6Anf92xD
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Life Sciences; Agriculture; Soil Science & Conservation; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry; Statistics for Engineering, Physics, Computer Science, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN
1385-2256
eISSN
1573-1618
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11119-012-9291-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The research reported here seeks to determine whether it is necessary to obtain optical reflectance measurements with a GreenSeeker® handheld sensor from each field to make accurate in-season nitrogen application recommendations for winter wheat, and how much precision—and profit—would be lost by moving from site-specific (or field-specific) optical reflectance sampling to region-level sampling. The approach used was to estimate a separate linear response-plateau regression every year using yield and optical reflectance data from randomized complete block experiments. Profits from region-level sampling and field-level sampling were statistically indistinguishable, but this result was mostly due to both being imprecise. Furthermore, the region- and field-based sampling systems were no better than break-even with the historical extension advice to apply preplant anhydrous ammonia at 90 kg ha−1. The approach of estimating a new regression every year is too imprecise, whether at the field or region level. This research goes beyond past research by accounting for the uncertainty in the estimated relationships. The poor performance of the systems is directly related to the imprecise relationship between yield and optical reflectance responses to nitrogen.

Journal

Precision AgricultureSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 31, 2012

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off