Introducing an RNA editing requirement into a plastid-localised transgene reduces but does not eliminate functional gene transfer to the nucleus

Introducing an RNA editing requirement into a plastid-localised transgene reduces but does not... In higher plants, DNA transfer from the plastid (chloroplast) genome to the nucleus is a frequent, ongoing process. However, there has been uncertainty over whether this transfer occurs by a direct DNA mechanism or whether RNA intermediates are involved. Previous experiments utilising transplastomic Nicotiana tabacum (tp7 and tp17) enabled the detection of plastid-to-nucleus transfer in real time. To determine whether RNA intermediates are involved in this transfer, transplastomic lines (tpneoACG) were generated containing, in their plastid genomes, a nuclear promoter-driven kanamycin resistance gene (neo) with a start codon that required plastid RNA editing but otherwise identical to tp7 and tp17. Therefore it was expected that kanamycin resistance would only be acquired following RNA-mediated transfer of neo to the nucleus. Screening of tpneoACG progeny revealed several kanamycin-resistant plants, each of which contained the neo gene located in the nucleus. Surprisingly, neo was unedited in all these plants, indicating that neoACG was active in the absence of an edited start codon and suggesting that RNA intermediates were not involved in the transfers. However, analysis of tpneoACG revealed that only a low proportion of transcripts potentially able to mediate neo transfer were edited, thus precluding unequivocal conclusions regarding the role of RNA in plastid-to-nucleus transfer. The low proportion of edited transcripts was found to be due to predominant antisense neo transcripts, rather than to low editing efficiency of the sense transcripts. This study highlights a number of important considerations in the design of experiments utilising plastid RNA editing. The results also suggest that RNA editing sites reduce but do not eliminate functional plastid-to-nucleus gene transfer. This is relevant both in an evolutionary context and in placing RNA editing-dependent genes in the plastid genome as a means of transgene containment. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Plant Molecular Biology Springer Journals

Introducing an RNA editing requirement into a plastid-localised transgene reduces but does not eliminate functional gene transfer to the nucleus

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/introducing-an-rna-editing-requirement-into-a-plastid-localised-GUAcciEslt
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subject
Life Sciences; Biochemistry, general; Plant Sciences ; Plant Pathology
ISSN
0167-4412
eISSN
1573-5028
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11103-011-9764-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In higher plants, DNA transfer from the plastid (chloroplast) genome to the nucleus is a frequent, ongoing process. However, there has been uncertainty over whether this transfer occurs by a direct DNA mechanism or whether RNA intermediates are involved. Previous experiments utilising transplastomic Nicotiana tabacum (tp7 and tp17) enabled the detection of plastid-to-nucleus transfer in real time. To determine whether RNA intermediates are involved in this transfer, transplastomic lines (tpneoACG) were generated containing, in their plastid genomes, a nuclear promoter-driven kanamycin resistance gene (neo) with a start codon that required plastid RNA editing but otherwise identical to tp7 and tp17. Therefore it was expected that kanamycin resistance would only be acquired following RNA-mediated transfer of neo to the nucleus. Screening of tpneoACG progeny revealed several kanamycin-resistant plants, each of which contained the neo gene located in the nucleus. Surprisingly, neo was unedited in all these plants, indicating that neoACG was active in the absence of an edited start codon and suggesting that RNA intermediates were not involved in the transfers. However, analysis of tpneoACG revealed that only a low proportion of transcripts potentially able to mediate neo transfer were edited, thus precluding unequivocal conclusions regarding the role of RNA in plastid-to-nucleus transfer. The low proportion of edited transcripts was found to be due to predominant antisense neo transcripts, rather than to low editing efficiency of the sense transcripts. This study highlights a number of important considerations in the design of experiments utilising plastid RNA editing. The results also suggest that RNA editing sites reduce but do not eliminate functional plastid-to-nucleus gene transfer. This is relevant both in an evolutionary context and in placing RNA editing-dependent genes in the plastid genome as a means of transgene containment.

Journal

Plant Molecular BiologySpringer Journals

Published: Mar 15, 2011

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off