Intra-rater repeatability of a structured method of selecting abstracts for the annual euraps scientific meeting

Intra-rater repeatability of a structured method of selecting abstracts for the annual euraps... To date, surprisingly little attention has been given to the process of selection of abstracts submitted to biomedical meetings and there are no reports on the intra-rater reliability of such a selection. We wanted to determine the intra-rater repeatability of the selection by multiple reviewers, of abstracts submitted to a plastic surgical scientific meeting. Prospective analysis of repeated structured ratings of five abstracts by three blinded reviewers of each of the 202 abstracts submitted to the annual scientific meeting of the European Association of Plastic Surgeons (EURAPS). The intra-class correlation coefficient of the score and repeated score of five abstracts and the kappa statistic of the dichotomy of acceptance of the top two rated abstracts vs rejection of the remaining three abstracts. Both were calculated for the set of repeated scores by each individual reviewer, as well as for the set of totals of scores by all reviewers. The median of the reviewers’ individual intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.86 (range, −0.56–0.92). Six out of 10 reviewers rated the same two abstracts as top abstracts during both reviews, resulting in kappa statistics ranging from −0.15 to 1.0 (median, 0.59). The median intra-class correlation coefficient of joined scores was 0.93 (range, 0.92–0.97), and the kappa statistic for the joined top-rated abstracts was 1.0. Excellent repeatability of the ranking and dichotomy of abstracts based on the joined scores of multiple peer reviewers gives confidence in EURAPS’ structured method of abstract selection. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Intra-rater repeatability of a structured method of selecting abstracts for the annual euraps scientific meeting

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/intra-rater-repeatability-of-a-structured-method-of-selecting-c6gEl7Rmqv
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-006-0061-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To date, surprisingly little attention has been given to the process of selection of abstracts submitted to biomedical meetings and there are no reports on the intra-rater reliability of such a selection. We wanted to determine the intra-rater repeatability of the selection by multiple reviewers, of abstracts submitted to a plastic surgical scientific meeting. Prospective analysis of repeated structured ratings of five abstracts by three blinded reviewers of each of the 202 abstracts submitted to the annual scientific meeting of the European Association of Plastic Surgeons (EURAPS). The intra-class correlation coefficient of the score and repeated score of five abstracts and the kappa statistic of the dichotomy of acceptance of the top two rated abstracts vs rejection of the remaining three abstracts. Both were calculated for the set of repeated scores by each individual reviewer, as well as for the set of totals of scores by all reviewers. The median of the reviewers’ individual intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.86 (range, −0.56–0.92). Six out of 10 reviewers rated the same two abstracts as top abstracts during both reviews, resulting in kappa statistics ranging from −0.15 to 1.0 (median, 0.59). The median intra-class correlation coefficient of joined scores was 0.93 (range, 0.92–0.97), and the kappa statistic for the joined top-rated abstracts was 1.0. Excellent repeatability of the ranking and dichotomy of abstracts based on the joined scores of multiple peer reviewers gives confidence in EURAPS’ structured method of abstract selection.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Sep 1, 2006

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off