Interpretation of the difference of optimal Mo density in MoS2-Al2O3 and MoS2-TiO2 HDS catalysts

Interpretation of the difference of optimal Mo density in MoS2-Al2O3 and MoS2-TiO2 HDS catalysts The first part of this paper deals with the morphology of the MoS2 phase and its oxide precursor, the MoO3 phase, mainly from a geometrical point of view. After giving a brief review of the literature describing the structure of these compounds, Mo densities in both phases were calculated along various crystallographic planes. Further, using structural models recently proposed by others, Mo densities in MoS2 were also calculated in the case of an epitactic growth on γ-Al2O3 and TiO2 model surfaces. Then, the calculated Mo densities were compared with experimental results (Mo density when HDS activity is maximal) previously obtained for catalysts constituted of MoS2 supported on a low SSA TiO2, a high SSA TiO2 and a conventional γ-alumina. It was suggested that either on alumina or titania the MoS2 phase is growing as (100) MoS2 planes. However, while on the alumina the optimal MoS2 phase might be constituted of dispersed MoS2 slabs covering only a part of the alumina surface (2.9–3.9 Mo atoms/nm2), on titania the optimal MoS2 phase might be constituted of a uniform MoS2 monolayer (5.2 atoms/nm2 for the high SSA titania, which is equal to the Mo density of a perfect MoS2 (100) plane). This difference may originate in the creation of a 'TiMoS' phase enhancing the S atoms mobility over Mo/TiO2-sulfided catalysts. Indeed, while in the case of a γ-alumina carrier the active sites (labile S atoms) are located on the edge of MoS2 slabs making the ratio Moedge/Mototal a crucial parameter for the catalytic performances, in the case of a titania carrier the labile sulfur atoms might be statistically distributed all over the TiMoS active phase. Further, the higher Mo density observed over the high SSA titania (5.2 atoms/nm2) when compared to that over the low SSA titania (4.2 atoms/nm2) was supposedly due to the pH-swing method advantageously used to prepare the former carrier. Indeed, this method allows giving a solid with enhanced mechanical properties providing a good stability to the derived catalysts under experimental conditions. In addition, this TiO2 carrier exhibits a great homogeneity, with a surface structure substantially uniform, which might be adequate for a long-range growth of (100) MoS2 slabs. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Research on Chemical Intermediates Springer Journals

Interpretation of the difference of optimal Mo density in MoS2-Al2O3 and MoS2-TiO2 HDS catalysts

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/interpretation-of-the-difference-of-optimal-mo-density-in-mos2-al2o3-X30mfjiXS3
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by VSP
Subject
Chemistry; Inorganic Chemistry; Physical Chemistry; Catalysis
ISSN
0922-6168
eISSN
1568-5675
D.O.I.
10.1163/156856705774576218
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The first part of this paper deals with the morphology of the MoS2 phase and its oxide precursor, the MoO3 phase, mainly from a geometrical point of view. After giving a brief review of the literature describing the structure of these compounds, Mo densities in both phases were calculated along various crystallographic planes. Further, using structural models recently proposed by others, Mo densities in MoS2 were also calculated in the case of an epitactic growth on γ-Al2O3 and TiO2 model surfaces. Then, the calculated Mo densities were compared with experimental results (Mo density when HDS activity is maximal) previously obtained for catalysts constituted of MoS2 supported on a low SSA TiO2, a high SSA TiO2 and a conventional γ-alumina. It was suggested that either on alumina or titania the MoS2 phase is growing as (100) MoS2 planes. However, while on the alumina the optimal MoS2 phase might be constituted of dispersed MoS2 slabs covering only a part of the alumina surface (2.9–3.9 Mo atoms/nm2), on titania the optimal MoS2 phase might be constituted of a uniform MoS2 monolayer (5.2 atoms/nm2 for the high SSA titania, which is equal to the Mo density of a perfect MoS2 (100) plane). This difference may originate in the creation of a 'TiMoS' phase enhancing the S atoms mobility over Mo/TiO2-sulfided catalysts. Indeed, while in the case of a γ-alumina carrier the active sites (labile S atoms) are located on the edge of MoS2 slabs making the ratio Moedge/Mototal a crucial parameter for the catalytic performances, in the case of a titania carrier the labile sulfur atoms might be statistically distributed all over the TiMoS active phase. Further, the higher Mo density observed over the high SSA titania (5.2 atoms/nm2) when compared to that over the low SSA titania (4.2 atoms/nm2) was supposedly due to the pH-swing method advantageously used to prepare the former carrier. Indeed, this method allows giving a solid with enhanced mechanical properties providing a good stability to the derived catalysts under experimental conditions. In addition, this TiO2 carrier exhibits a great homogeneity, with a surface structure substantially uniform, which might be adequate for a long-range growth of (100) MoS2 slabs.

Journal

Research on Chemical IntermediatesSpringer Journals

Published: Nov 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off