Intensive care medicine in 2050: statistical tools for development of prognostic models (why clinicians should not be ignored)

Intensive care medicine in 2050: statistical tools for development of prognostic models (why... Intensive Care Med (2017) 43:1403–1406 DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4825-x WHAT ’S NE W IN INTENSIVE C ARE Intensive care medicine in 2050: statistical tools for development of prognostic models (why clinicians should not be ignored) 1* 2 2 Daniele Poole , Greta Carrara and Guido Bertolini © 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM Predictive ability assessment of prognostic models (Gruppo Italiano per la Valutazione degli interventi in When physicians admit a patient to the intensive care Terapia Intensiva) calibration belt (Fig. 1), which provides unit (ICU), they automatically grade the degree of sever- statistically rigorous information on deviation from the ity and formulate an initial prognosis. This is a com - ideal perfect matching between predicted and observed plex integration process of anamnestic information and death rates [3, 4]. physiological data with data from experience and culture. Traditionally, calibration has been assessed with the This approach, however, does not numerically quantify Hosmer–Lemeshow statistics [5], which, although detecting overall miscalibration, does not indicate the patient’s risk and may be heavily influenced by sub - whether the model predicts more or less deaths than jectivity. Prognostic models, such as the severity scores those observed. The combination with traditional cali of the APACHE and SAPS series, have been developed http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Intensive Care Medicine Springer Journals

Intensive care medicine in 2050: statistical tools for development of prognostic models (why clinicians should not be ignored)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/intensive-care-medicine-in-2050-statistical-tools-for-development-of-XqlDTrRpDe
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Intensive / Critical Care Medicine; Anesthesiology; Emergency Medicine; Pneumology/Respiratory System; Pain Medicine; Pediatrics
ISSN
0342-4642
eISSN
1432-1238
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00134-017-4825-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Intensive Care Med (2017) 43:1403–1406 DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4825-x WHAT ’S NE W IN INTENSIVE C ARE Intensive care medicine in 2050: statistical tools for development of prognostic models (why clinicians should not be ignored) 1* 2 2 Daniele Poole , Greta Carrara and Guido Bertolini © 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM Predictive ability assessment of prognostic models (Gruppo Italiano per la Valutazione degli interventi in When physicians admit a patient to the intensive care Terapia Intensiva) calibration belt (Fig. 1), which provides unit (ICU), they automatically grade the degree of sever- statistically rigorous information on deviation from the ity and formulate an initial prognosis. This is a com - ideal perfect matching between predicted and observed plex integration process of anamnestic information and death rates [3, 4]. physiological data with data from experience and culture. Traditionally, calibration has been assessed with the This approach, however, does not numerically quantify Hosmer–Lemeshow statistics [5], which, although detecting overall miscalibration, does not indicate the patient’s risk and may be heavily influenced by sub - whether the model predicts more or less deaths than jectivity. Prognostic models, such as the severity scores those observed. The combination with traditional cali of the APACHE and SAPS series, have been developed

Journal

Intensive Care MedicineSpringer Journals

Published: Jun 2, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off