Infant Mortality and Socioeconomic Status: Comment on Stockwell Etal.

Infant Mortality and Socioeconomic Status: Comment on Stockwell Etal. Population Research and Policy Review (2005) 24: 401–403  Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s11113-005-0090-8 Infant mortality and socioeconomic status: Comment on Stockwell et al. MARY A. MCGEHEE Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services Division of Health, Center for Health Statistics, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA The United States has embarked upon an initiative to eliminate health disparities between advantaged and disadvantaged populations in this country (DHHS 1992, 2000). Being able to measure our pro- gress in eliminating these disparities, as well as knowing exactly where and why they exist, requires having reliable data or information to track and monitor changes in health indicators or outcomes. The research done by Stockwell et al. (2005; in this issue) on the relation- ship between infant mortality and socioeconomic status for whites and nonwhites covering five time periods and four decades for Ohio is an important step towards making that type of information available. Their research is also important for a number of other reasons. Eliminating health disparities requires that we understand how these disparities may vary based on a combination of factors that include race/ethnicity, gender, age, cause of death or incidence of disease, and geography. A dilemma faced by researchers is how http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Population Research and Policy Review Springer Journals

Infant Mortality and Socioeconomic Status: Comment on Stockwell Etal.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/infant-mortality-and-socioeconomic-status-comment-on-stockwell-etal-1GdNoF64m0
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Springer
Subject
Geography; Economic Policy; Population Economics; Demography
ISSN
0167-5923
eISSN
1573-7829
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11113-005-0090-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Population Research and Policy Review (2005) 24: 401–403  Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s11113-005-0090-8 Infant mortality and socioeconomic status: Comment on Stockwell et al. MARY A. MCGEHEE Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services Division of Health, Center for Health Statistics, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA The United States has embarked upon an initiative to eliminate health disparities between advantaged and disadvantaged populations in this country (DHHS 1992, 2000). Being able to measure our pro- gress in eliminating these disparities, as well as knowing exactly where and why they exist, requires having reliable data or information to track and monitor changes in health indicators or outcomes. The research done by Stockwell et al. (2005; in this issue) on the relation- ship between infant mortality and socioeconomic status for whites and nonwhites covering five time periods and four decades for Ohio is an important step towards making that type of information available. Their research is also important for a number of other reasons. Eliminating health disparities requires that we understand how these disparities may vary based on a combination of factors that include race/ethnicity, gender, age, cause of death or incidence of disease, and geography. A dilemma faced by researchers is how

Journal

Population Research and Policy ReviewSpringer Journals

Published: Jun 22, 2005

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off