Individuals’ Perception and Processing of Risk Information: Exploratory Evidence from Germany

Individuals’ Perception and Processing of Risk Information: Exploratory Evidence from Germany This paper presents a first exploratory study to analyze private investors’ perceptions regarding risk reporting. With the help of think-aloud protocols, we gain insight into how and to what extent readers perceive risk information of a German savings bank, which specific information cues are relevant for informed judgment and decision-making, and whether these assessments are correct in relation to an expert benchmark. The results reveal that, during the reading process, the perceived information broadly coincides with the structure of the risk report considered. Only little information is indeed relevant. Information about the risk exposure is more relevant than information about the risk management system for the participants’ judgments and decisions, but each of them play an important role. On average, the participants’ assessments are actually in line with the expert benchmark and can therefore be considered correct–even the information cues mentioned as relevant are similar. These results provide a first indication of preferable approaches to risk reporting from the addressees’ point of view. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Schmalenbach Business Review Springer Journals

Individuals’ Perception and Processing of Risk Information: Exploratory Evidence from Germany

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/individuals-perception-and-processing-of-risk-information-exploratory-B0hjyuUNyq
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft für Betriebswirtschaft e.V.
Subject
Business and Management; Business and Management, general; Finance, general; Accounting/Auditing; Marketing; Management; Production
ISSN
1439-2917
eISSN
2194-072X
D.O.I.
10.1007/s41464-018-0052-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper presents a first exploratory study to analyze private investors’ perceptions regarding risk reporting. With the help of think-aloud protocols, we gain insight into how and to what extent readers perceive risk information of a German savings bank, which specific information cues are relevant for informed judgment and decision-making, and whether these assessments are correct in relation to an expert benchmark. The results reveal that, during the reading process, the perceived information broadly coincides with the structure of the risk report considered. Only little information is indeed relevant. Information about the risk exposure is more relevant than information about the risk management system for the participants’ judgments and decisions, but each of them play an important role. On average, the participants’ assessments are actually in line with the expert benchmark and can therefore be considered correct–even the information cues mentioned as relevant are similar. These results provide a first indication of preferable approaches to risk reporting from the addressees’ point of view.

Journal

Schmalenbach Business ReviewSpringer Journals

Published: Jun 6, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off