Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Stanley (2013)
Can Technology Improve Large Class Learning? The Case of an Upper-Division Business Core ClassJournal of Education for Business, 88
Harriet Barrish, M. Saunders, M. Wolf (1969)
Good behavior game: effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2 2
B. Gibson (1991)
Research Methods Jeopardy: A Tool for Involving Students and Organizing the Study SessionTeaching of Psychology, 18
E Walklet, S Davis, D Farrelly, K Muse (2016)
The impact of student response systems on the learning experience of undergraduate psychology studentsPsychology Teaching Review, 22
Crystalyn Schnorr, Shaqwana Freeman‐Green, D. Test (2016)
Response Cards as a Strategy for Increasing Opportunities to RespondRemedial and Special Education, 37
Stephanie *, S. Mehta, T. Sellnow (2005)
Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in useHigher Education Research & Development, 24
J. Brophy (1986)
Teacher influences on student achievement.American Psychologist, 41
Jeanne Donaldson, Katie Wiskow, P. Soto (2015)
Immediate and distal effects of the good behavior game.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 48 3
Charles Greenwood, Granger Dinwiddie, Barbara Terry, Linda Wade, Sandra Stanley, S. Thibadeau, J. Delquadri (1984)
Teacher- versus peer-mediated instruction: an ecobehavioral analysis of achievement outcomes.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 17 4
M. Clayton, C. Woodard (2007)
The Effect of Response Cards on Participation and Weekly Quiz Scores of University Students Enrolled in Introductory Psychology CoursesJournal of Behavioral Education, 16
C. Darch, H. Thorpe (1977)
The principal game: A group consequence procedure to increase classroom in-task behavior†Psychology in the Schools, 14
D. Tingstrom (2002)
Good Behavior Game
Eric Dion, Catherine Roux, Danika Landry, D. Fuchs, J. Wehby, V. Dupéré (2011)
Improving Attention and Preventing Reading Difficulties among Low-Income First-Graders: A Randomized StudyPrevention Science, 12
Dion Darveaux (1984)
The Good Behavior Game Plus Merit: Controlling disruptive behavior and improving student motivation.School Psychology Review, 13
Keith Duncan, A. Kenworthy, Raymond McNamara (2012)
The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous Participation on Students' Performance in Online Accounting CoursesAccounting Education, 21
S. Salend, Catherine Reynolds, Eileen Coyle (1989)
Individualizing the Good Behavior Game Across Type and Frequency of Behavior with Emotionally Disturbed AdolescentsBehavior Modification, 13
Andrea Flower, J. McKenna, Rommel Bunuan, Colin Muething, Ramon Vega (2014)
Effects of the Good Behavior Game on Challenging Behaviors in School SettingsReview of Educational Research, 84
B. McCurdy, Amanda Lannie, Ernesto Barnabas (2009)
Reducing disruptive behavior in an urban school cafeteria: An extension of the Good Behavior GameJournal of School Psychology, 47
W. Heward (1994)
Three "low-tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction.
Jolene Sy, O. Gratz, Jeanne Donaldson (2016)
The Good Behavior Game with Students in Alternative Educational Environments: Interactions Between Reinforcement Criteria and Scoring AccuracyJournal of Behavioral Education, 25
Christine Christle, J. Schuster (2003)
The Effects of Using Response Cards on Student Participation, Academic Achievement, and On-Task Behavior During Whole-Class, Math InstructionJournal of Behavioral Education, 12
T. Mohr (2013)
Iclickers and student performanceInternational Review of Economics Education, 14
K. Kleinman, P. Saigh (2011)
The Effects of the Good Behavior Game on the Conduct of Regular Education New York City High School StudentsBehavior Modification, 35
WL Heward (1994)
Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction
Emma Bojinova, J. Oigara (2014)
Teaching and Learning with Clickers in Higher Education.The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25
D. Tingstrom, Heather Sterling-Turner, S. Wilczynski (2006)
The Good Behavior Game: 1969-2002Behavior Modification, 30
Selma Powell, C. Straub, Jacqueline Rodriguez, Barbara VanHorn (2011)
Using Clickers in Large College Psychology Classes: Academic Achievement and PerceptionsJournal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11
CI Schnorr, S Freeman-Green, DW Test (2016)
Response cards as a strategy for increasing opportunities to respond: An examination of the evidenceRemedial and Special Education, 37
Justus Randolph (2007)
Meta-Analysis of the Research on Response CardsJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9
D. Barlow, S. Hayes (1979)
Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 12 2
Jeanne Donaldson, T. Vollmer, Tangala Krous, S. Downs, Kerri Berard (2011)
An evaluation of the good behavior game in kindergarten classrooms.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 44 3
Jill Fishbein, B. Wasik (1981)
Effect of the good behavior game on disruptive library behavior.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 14 1
JJ Randolph (2007)
Meta-analysis of the research on response cards: Effects on test achievement, quiz achievement, participation, and off-task behaviorJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9
S. Newstead (2016)
Abstracts of recent articles published in Psychology Teaching ReviewPsychology Learning & Teaching, 15
Participation in college classrooms remains low, despite evidence that increased participation contributes to better grades. Incorporating active student educational strategies may help combat poor participation. The Good Behavior Game is a tool for improving various behaviors of children and adolescents in schools. However, strategies similar to the Good Behavior Game have not yet been assessed with young adults in college classrooms. We used an alternating treatments design to evaluate effects of a modified version of the Good Behavior Game on participation across three introductory psychology courses at a public university. We collected baseline data on class participation and then compared two variations of the Good Behavior Game—one included delivering a preferred reward to individuals on the winning team and one did not include a reward. Incorporating components of the Good Behavior Game increased class participation with and without a preferred reward, relative to baseline. Students reported preferring the game with a reward relative to the game with no reward and not playing the game. Because class participation has been correlated with better course grades, incorporating features of the Good Behavior Game may be a feasible approach for improving college students’ education.
Journal of Behavioral Education – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 31, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.