A model is given in this article that associates response time to each item with its relative difficulty for the person examined. The properties of the model are presented with respect to the quantity of information, while deducing the parameter estimators. Likewise, an empirical study to prove the feasibility and plausibility of the model is carried out, feasibility being understood as the existence of adequate estimators for the parameters of the model and plausibility the adjustment of the model proposed to the items in a spatial aptitude test used to demonstrate this (“Rotation of solid figures”). For this, the model is tested with simulated data, comparing the behaviour of the estimates carried out on the model proposed with the estimates made by a programme such as BILOG-MG. It is shown that, with the exception of parameter c (pseudo-chance) which does not benefit from the inclusion of the response time, the estimates for the model are always higher for parameters a (discrimination) and b (difficulty) of the items, always giving rise to a higher correlation with the original data, in spite of the inefficiency of the computation algorithm employed. The results suggest that the use of response time supplies as much information or more than the use of very informative a priori distributions.
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: May 28, 2004
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud