Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

In search of indicators to assess the environmental impact of diets

In search of indicators to assess the environmental impact of diets Int J Life Cycle Assess (2018) 23:1297–1314 DOI 10.1007/s11367-017-1371-2 POLICIES AND SUPPORT IN RELATION TO LCA 1 2 2 Corné van Dooren & Harry Aiking & Pier Vellinga Received: 3 March 2017 /Accepted: 29 June 2017 /Published online: 2 August 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract level, life cycle assessment includes 11 pressure indicators. Purpose The aim of this paper is to identify a set of crucial Of the latter, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) and land indicators to assess the most pressing environmental impacts use (LU) are the most frequently used indicators in diet of diets. studies. Methods Based on a literature review, 55 potential assessment Conclusions We conclude that GHGEs and LU fulfill the se- methods were selected and their distinctive indicators identi- lection criteria and address most of the environmental impact fied. The methods were classified according to their position of diets well. In the future, these indicators should be supple- in the DPSIR framework [chain of Drivers, Pressures, State mented with an indicator addressing the nitrogen and phos- (changes), Impacts, and Responses], and into 15 environmen- phorous efficiency of food products. tal issues at three levels. The selection was narrowed down to . . eight, based http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Springer Journals

In search of indicators to assess the environmental impact of diets

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/in-search-of-indicators-to-assess-the-environmental-impact-of-diets-R6RtpTwKcS
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Environment; Environment, general; Environmental Economics; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology; Environmental Chemistry
ISSN
0948-3349
eISSN
1614-7502
DOI
10.1007/s11367-017-1371-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Int J Life Cycle Assess (2018) 23:1297–1314 DOI 10.1007/s11367-017-1371-2 POLICIES AND SUPPORT IN RELATION TO LCA 1 2 2 Corné van Dooren & Harry Aiking & Pier Vellinga Received: 3 March 2017 /Accepted: 29 June 2017 /Published online: 2 August 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract level, life cycle assessment includes 11 pressure indicators. Purpose The aim of this paper is to identify a set of crucial Of the latter, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) and land indicators to assess the most pressing environmental impacts use (LU) are the most frequently used indicators in diet of diets. studies. Methods Based on a literature review, 55 potential assessment Conclusions We conclude that GHGEs and LU fulfill the se- methods were selected and their distinctive indicators identi- lection criteria and address most of the environmental impact fied. The methods were classified according to their position of diets well. In the future, these indicators should be supple- in the DPSIR framework [chain of Drivers, Pressures, State mented with an indicator addressing the nitrogen and phos- (changes), Impacts, and Responses], and into 15 environmen- phorous efficiency of food products. tal issues at three levels. The selection was narrowed down to . . eight, based

Journal

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment – Springer Journals

Published: Aug 2, 2017

References

  • Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach
    Abaza, H; Bisset, R; Sadler, B
  • Protein production: planet, profit, plus people?
    Aiking, H
  • What current literature tells us about sustainable diets: emerging research linking dietary patterns, environmental sustainability, and economics
    Auestad, N; Fulgoni, VL
  • Significant atmospheric aerosol pollution caused by world food cultivation
    Bauer, SE; Tsigaridis, K; Miller, R
  • The global burden of disease study and the preventable burden of NCD
    Benziger, CP; Roth, GA; Moran, AE
  • Introducing carrying capacity-based normalisation in LCA: framework and development of references at midpoint level
    Bjørn, A; Hauschild, MZ
  • Eating up the world’s food web and the human trophic level
    Bonhommeau, S; Dubroca, L; Pape, O; Barde, J; Kaplan, DM; Chassot, E; Nieblas, A-E
  • Deriving indicators of sustainable development
    Bossel, H
  • Our common future, United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development
    Brundtland, GH
  • Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change
    Carlsson-Kanyama, A; Gonzalez, AD
  • Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts
    Vries, W; Kros, J; Kroeze, C; Seitzinger, SP
  • Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input–output framework
    Ewing, BR; Hawkins, TR; Wiedmann, TO; Galli, A; Ertug Ercin, A; Weinzettel, J; Steen-Olsen, K
  • Environmental footprints: assessing anthropogenic effects on the planet’s environment
    Fang, K
  • Investigating the inventory and characterization aspects of footprinting methods: lessons for the classification and integration of footprints
    Fang, K; Heijungs, R
  • Rethinking the relationship between footprints and LCA
    Fang, K; Heijungs, R
  • Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family
    Fang, K; Heijungs, R; Snoo, GR
  • Understanding the complementary linkages between environmental footprints and planetary boundaries in a footprint–boundary environmental sustainability assessment framework
    Fang, K; Heijungs, R; Snoo, GR
  • The chemical elements of life
    Frieden, E
  • Modelling human health effects of radioactive releases in life cycle impact assessment
    Frischknecht, R; Braunschweig, A; Hofstetter, P; Suter, P
  • National environmental footprints and planetary boundaries: from methodology to policy implementation 59th LCA forum, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, June 12, 2015
    Frischknecht, R; Stolz, P; Tschümperlin, L
  • Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “footprint family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet
    Galli, A; Wiedmann, T; Ercin, E; Knoblauch, D; Ewing, B; Giljum, S
  • A footprint family extended MRIO model to support Europe’s transition to a one planet economy
    Galli, A; Weinzettel, J; Cranston, G; Ercin, E
  • Questioning the ecological footprint
    Galli, A
  • Natural resource use for food: land, water and energy in production and consumption systems
    Gerbens-Leenes, PW
  • National Footprint Accounts data tables
  • ReCiPe 2008, a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level; first edition Report I: characterisation
    Goedkoop, MJ; Heijungs, R; Huijbregts, M; Schryver, A; Struijs, J; Zelm, R
  • Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards
    Guinée, JB; Gorrée, M; Heijungs, R; Huppes, G; Kleijn, R; Koning, A; Oers, L; Wegener Sleeswijk, A; Suh, S; Udo De Haes, HA; Bruijn, JA; Huijbregts, MJ
  • Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept?
    Hansen, JW
  • Maximizing affluence within the planetary boundaries
    Heijungs, R; Koning, A; Guinée, JB
  • New insights on ecological footprinting as environmental indicator for production processes
    Herva, M; García-Diéguez, C; Franco-Uría, A; Roca, E
  • Incorporating chemical footprint reporting into social responsibility reporting
    Hitchcock, K; Panko, J; Scott, P
  • Human appropriation of natural capital: a comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis
    Hoekstra, AY
  • Water footprints of nations: volume 1: main report, value of water volume 2: appendices
    Hoekstra, AY; Chapagain, AK
  • Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint
    Hoekstra, AY; Wiedmann, TO
  • Global monthly water scarcity: blue water footprints versus blue water availability
    Hoekstra, AY; Mekonnen, MM; Chapagain, AK; Mathews, RE; Richter, BD
  • Quantification of spatially differentiated resource footprints for products and services through a macro-economic and thermodynamic approach
    Huysman, S; Schaubroeck, T; Dewulf, J
  • A systematic review of the measurement of sustainable diets
    Jones, AD; Hoey, L; Blesh, J; Miller, L; Green, A; Shapiro, LF
  • ILCD handbook: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context
  • Taking planetary nutrient boundaries seriously: can we feed the people?
    Kahiluoto, H; Kuisma, M; Kuokkanen, A; Mikkilä, M; Linnanen, L
  • The DPSIR framework
    Kristensen, P
  • A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment
    Leach, AM; Galloway, JN; Bleeker, A; Erisman, JW; Kohn, R; Kitzes, J
  • The nitrogen footprint of food products in the European Union
    Leip, A; Weiss, F; Lesschen, JP; Westhoek, H
  • On the bioproductivity and land-disturbance metrics of the ecological footprint
    Lenzen, M; Borgstrom Hansson, C; Bond, S
  • Mapping the structure of the world economy
    Lenzen, M; Kanemoto, K; Moran, D; Geschke, A
  • Past and future trends in grey water footprints of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to major world rivers
    Liu, C; Kroeze, C; Hoekstra, AY; Gerbens-Leenes, W
  • Biodiversity conservation: the key is reducing meat consumption
    Machovina, B; Feeley, KJ; Ripple, WJ
  • The environmental impact of our food an analysis based on the food consumption survey 2007–2010 (in Dutch)
    Marinussen, M; Kramer, G; Pluimers, J; Blonk, H
  • Questioning environmental security
    Mason, M; Zeitoun, M
  • Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA (11 pp)
    Milà i Canals, L; Bauer, C; Depestele, J; Dubreuil, A; Freiermuth Knuchel, R; Gaillard, G; Michelsen, O; Müller-Wenk, R; Rydgren, B
  • Does ecologically unequal exchange occur?
    Moran, DD; Lenzen, M; Kanemoto, K; Geschke, A
  • Environmental indices: theory and practice
    Ott, WR
  • Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century
    Pereira, HM
  • Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales
    Peters, GP
  • Water resources: agricultural and environmental issues
    Pimentel, D
  • Monetary valuation in life cycle assessment: a review
    Pizzol, M; Weidema, B; Brandão, M; Osset, P
  • The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA
    Posch, M; Seppälä, J; Hettelingh, J-P; Johansson, M; Margni, M; Jolliet, O
  • Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out
    Rees, WE
  • Revisiting carrying capacity: area-based indicators of sustainability
    Rees, WE
  • Indicators of sustainable agriculture: a scoping analysis
    Reytar, K; Hanson, C; Henninger, N
  • A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity
    Ridoutt, BG; Pfister, S
  • NEVO-table: Dutch food nutrients database (in Dutch)
  • A safe operating space for humanity
    Rockström, J
  • USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment
    Rosenbaum, RK; Bachmann, TM; Gold, LS; Huijbregts, MJ; Jolliet, O; Juraske, R; Koehler, A; Larsen, HF; Macleod, M; Margni, M; Mckone, TE; Payet, J; Schuhmacher, M; Meent, D; Hauschild, MZ
  • The environmental cost of protein food choices
    Sabaté, J; Sranacharoenpong, K; Harwatt, H; Wien, M; Soret, S
  • Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100
    Sala, OE
  • Scope and precision of sustainability assessment approaches to food systems
    Schader, C; Grenz, J; Meier, MS; Stolze, M
  • Country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator (14 pp)
    Seppälä, J; Posch, M; Johansson, M; Hettelingh, J-P
  • Environmental analysis foods and food losses for priority streams chain-oriented waste policy (in Dutch)
    Sevenster, MN; Blonk, H; Svd, F
  • Environmental indicators: typology and overview
    Smeets, E; Weterings, R
  • The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?
    Steffen, W; Crutzen, J; McNeill, JR
  • Ecological footprint—a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies
    Stöglehner, G
  • European nitrogen assessment (ENA)
    Sutton, MA; Grinsven, H
  • Exploring a safe operating approach to weighting in life cycle impact assessment—a case study of organic, conventional and integrated farming systems
    Tuomisto, HL; Hodge, ID; Riordan, P; Macdonald, DW
  • Economic valuation of water resources in agriculture, in: FAO Water Reports 27
    Turner, K; Georgiou, S; Clark, R; Brouwer, R; Burke, J
  • Just eating healthier is not enough: studying the environmental impact of different diet scenarios for Dutch women (31–50 years old) by linear programming
    Tyszler, M; Kramer, G; Blonk, H
  • Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’
    Bergh, JCJM; Verbruggen, H
  • Proposing a novel index reflecting both climate impact and nutritional impact of food products
    Dooren, C; Douma, A; Aiking, H; Vellinga, P
  • European characterization factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment
    Zelm, R; Huijbregts, MJ; Hollander, HA; Jaarsveld, HA; Sauter, FJ; Struijs, J; Wijnen, HJ; Meent, D
  • Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems
    Vitousek, PM; Mooney, HA; Lubchenco, J; Melillo, JM
  • A hybrid multi-region method (HMR) for assessing the environmental impact of private consumption
    Vringer, K; Benders, R; Wilting, H; Brink, C; Drissen, E; Nijdam, D; Hoogervorst, N
  • Our ecological footprint, reducing human impact on the earth
    Wackernagel, M; Rees, W
  • The phosphorus footprint of China’s food chain: implications for food security, natural resource management, and environmental quality
    Wang, F; Sims, JT; Ma, L; Ma, W; Dou, Z; Zhang, F
  • Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results
    Weidema, BP
  • Affluence drives the global displacement of land use
    Weinzettel, J; Hertwich, EG; Peters, GP; Steen-Olsen, K; Galli, A
  • Nitrogen on the table: the influence of food choices on nitrogen emissions and the European environment
    Westhoek, H
  • The material footprint of nations
    Wiedmann, TO; Schandl, H; Lenzen, M; Moran, D; Suh, S; West, J; Kanemoto, K