Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
HI Strømsø, I Bråten, MA Britt, L Ferguson (2013)
Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documentsCognition and Instruction, 31
DJ Leu, L Zawilinski, J Castek, M Banerjee, B Housand, Y Liu, M O‘Neil (2007)
Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practices
M Bannert (2003)
Effekte metakognitiver Lernhilfen auf den Wissenserwerb in vernetzten Lernumgebungen [Effects of metacognitive learning aids in networked learning environments]Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17
J Colwell, S Hunt-Barron, D Reinking (2013)
Obstacles to Developing Digital Literacy on the Internet in Middle School Science InstructionJournal of Literacy Research, 45
SS Wineburg (1991)
Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidenceJournal of Educational Psychology, 83
L Baker (1989)
Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult readerEducational Psychology Review, 1
L Mason, A Boldrin, N Ariasi (2010)
Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active?Instructional Science, 38
R Bromme, S Goldman (2014)
The public’s bounded understanding of scienceEducational Psychologist, 49
M McCrudden, G Schraw (2007)
Relevance and goal-focusing in text processingEducational Psychology Review, 19
JLG Braasch, I Bråten, HI Strømsø, Ø Anmarkrud, LE Ferguson (2013)
Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documentsContemporary Educational Psychology, 38
FC Keil (2012)
Running on empty? How folk science gets by with lessCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 21
J Sweller, P Ayres, S Kalyuga (2011)
Cognitive load theory. Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies
RC Mayer, JH Davis, FD Schoorman (1995)
An Integrative Model Of Organizational TrustAcademy of Management Review, 20
L Scharrer, M Stadtler, R Bromme (2014)
You’d better ask an expert: Mitigating the comprehensibility effect on laypeople’s decisions about science-based knowledge claimsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 28
VK Jaswal, LS Malone (2007)
Turning Bbelievers into skeptics: 3-year-olds’ sensitivity to cues to speaker credibilityJournal of Cognition and Development, 8
W Schneider, M Schlagmüller, M Ennemoser (2007)
LGVT 6-12. Lesegeschwindigkeits-und Verständnistest für die Klassenstufen 6-12
JD Nokes, JA Dole, DJ Hacker (2007)
Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical textsJournal of Educational Psychology, 99
J Braasch, J-F Rouet, N Vibert, M Britt (2012)
Readers’ use of source information in text comprehensionMemory and Cognition, 40
S Barzilai, Y Eshet-Alkalai (2015)
The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpointsLearning and Instruction, 36
J Maier, T Richter (2013)
Text-belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting informationCognition and Instruction, 31
CA Perfetti, J-F Rouet, MA Britt (1999)
The construction of mental representations during reading
FC Keil (2010)
The feasibility of folk scienceCognitive Science, 34
E Kuiper, M Volman, J Terwel (2009)
Developing Web literacy in collaborative inquiry activitiesComputers & Education, 52
DJ Leu, CK Kinzer (2000)
The convergence of literacy instruction and networked technologies for information and communicationReading Research Quarterly, 35
Y Kammerer, D Amann, P Gerjets (2015)
When adults without university education search the Internet for health information: The roles of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and a source evaluation interventionComputers in Human Behavior, 48
A Walraven, S Brand-Gruwel, HA Boshuizen (2013)
Fostering students’ evaluation behaviour while searching the internetInstructional Science, 41
D Brossard, DA Scheufele (2013)
Science, New Media, and the PublicScience, 339
FC Keil, C Stein, L Webb, VD Billings, L Rozenblit (2008)
Discerning the division of cognitive labor: An emerging understanding of how knowledge is clustered in other mindsCognitive Science, 32
M Stadtler, R Bromme (2008)
Effects of the metacognitive tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersonsComputers in Human Behavior, 24
T Richter, S Schroeder, B Wöhrmann (2009)
You don’t have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of informationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96
M Stadtler, L Scharrer, T Skodzik, R Bromme (2014)
Comprehending multiple documents on scientific controversies: Effects of reading goals and signaling rhetorical relationshipsDiscourse Processes, 51
L Mason, AA Junyent, MC Tornatora (2014)
Epistemic evaluation and comprehension of web-source information on controversial science-related topics: Effects of a short-term instructional interventionComputers & Education, 76
DN Rapp (2008)
How do readers handle incorrect information during reading?Memory and Cognition, 36
M Stadtler, R Bromme, J-F Rouet (2014)
„Science meets reading“: Worin bestehen die Kompetenzen zum Lesen multipler Dokumente zu Wissenschaftsthemen und wie fördert man sie? [„Science meets reading“: What are the competencies of reading multiple documents on science topics and how to foster them?]Unterrichtswissenschaft, 42
PL Harris (2012)
Trusting what you’re told
M Macedo-Rouet, J Braasch, MA Britt, J-F Rouet (2013)
Teaching fourth and fifth graders to evaluate information sources during text comprehensionCognition and Instruction, 31
A Walraven, S Brand-Gruwel, HPA Boshuizen (2009)
How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for informationComputers & Education, 52
M Stadtler, R Bromme (2014)
Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences
JF Rouet, MA Britt (2011)
Text relevance and learning from text
R Bromme, D Kienhues, T Porsch (2010)
Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice
MA Koenig, PL Harris (2005)
Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakersChild Development, 76
DJ Leu, E Forzani, C Rhoads, C Maykel, C Kennedy, N Timbrell (2015)
The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gapReading Research Quarterly, 50
MA Britt, C Aglinskas (2002)
Improving student’s ability to identify and use source informationCognition and Instruction, 20
L Mason, A Boldrin, N Ariasi (2010)
Epistemic metacognition in context: Evaluating and learning online informationMetacognition and Learning, 5
J Wiley, SR Goldman, AC Graesser, CA Sanchez, IK Ash, JA Hemmerich (2009)
Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasksAmerican Educational Research Journal, 46
R Bromme, E Thomm (2015)
Knowing who knows: Laypersons’ capabilities to judge experts’ pertinence for science topicsCognitive Science
JM Otero, AC Graesser (2001)
PREG: Elements of a model of question askingCognition and Instruction, 19
M Stadtler, L Scharrer, B Brummernhenrich, R Bromme (2013)
Dealing with uncertainty: Readers’ memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertiseCognition and Instruction, 31
P Gerjets, Y Kammerer, B Werner (2011)
Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking dataLearning and Instruction, 21
We present an empirical investigation of a classroom training fostering vocational students’ consideration of source information when deciding about science-based controversies. The training was specifically aimed at raising students’ awareness of the division of cognitive labor and the resulting need to take a source’s competence into account when deciding whom to trust. Data were collected from a training group and a waiting list control group in a pretest–posttest design. The results show that students benefitted from the training in terms of their inclination to agree with pertinent expert sources rather than low-pertinent experts and to refer to the source of information to justify their judgment. Source memory was not affected by the training.
Reading and Writing – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 12, 2016
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.