Implications of the Alternating Access Model for Organic Anion Transporter Kinetics

Implications of the Alternating Access Model for Organic Anion Transporter Kinetics Many transport proteins, including the clinically important organic anion transporters (OATs), appear to function via an “alternating access” mechanism. In analyzing the kinetics of these transporters, the terms K m and V max are often treated in the field as denoting, respectively, the affinity of the substrate for the transporter and the turnover (conformational switch) rate of the substrate–transporter complex. In fact, the expressions for both these parameters have very complex forms comprising multiple rate constants from conformational switch as well as association/dissociation steps in the cycling of the transporter and, therefore, do not have straightforward physical meanings. However, if the rapid equilibrium assumption is made (namely, that the association/dissociation steps occur far more rapidly than the conformational switch steps), these expressions become greatly simplified and their physical meaning clear, though still distinct from the conventional interpretations. V max will be a function of not just the rate of substrate–transporter complex turnover but also the rate of the “return” conformational switch and will vary largely with the slower of these two steps (the rate-limiting step). K m will be seen to be related to substrate affinity by a term that varies inversely with the substrate–transporter complex turnover rate, essentially because the greater this rate, the greater the extent to which transporters will be distributed in a conformation inaccessible to substrate. Here, an intuitive approach is presented to demonstrate these conclusions. The phenomena of trans-stimulation and trans-inhibition are discussed in the context of this analysis. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Membrane Biology Springer Journals

Implications of the Alternating Access Model for Organic Anion Transporter Kinetics

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/implications-of-the-alternating-access-model-for-organic-anion-WxRClB0J0F
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Life Sciences; Human Physiology ; Biochemistry, general
ISSN
0022-2631
eISSN
1432-1424
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00232-008-9137-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Many transport proteins, including the clinically important organic anion transporters (OATs), appear to function via an “alternating access” mechanism. In analyzing the kinetics of these transporters, the terms K m and V max are often treated in the field as denoting, respectively, the affinity of the substrate for the transporter and the turnover (conformational switch) rate of the substrate–transporter complex. In fact, the expressions for both these parameters have very complex forms comprising multiple rate constants from conformational switch as well as association/dissociation steps in the cycling of the transporter and, therefore, do not have straightforward physical meanings. However, if the rapid equilibrium assumption is made (namely, that the association/dissociation steps occur far more rapidly than the conformational switch steps), these expressions become greatly simplified and their physical meaning clear, though still distinct from the conventional interpretations. V max will be a function of not just the rate of substrate–transporter complex turnover but also the rate of the “return” conformational switch and will vary largely with the slower of these two steps (the rate-limiting step). K m will be seen to be related to substrate affinity by a term that varies inversely with the substrate–transporter complex turnover rate, essentially because the greater this rate, the greater the extent to which transporters will be distributed in a conformation inaccessible to substrate. Here, an intuitive approach is presented to demonstrate these conclusions. The phenomena of trans-stimulation and trans-inhibition are discussed in the context of this analysis.

Journal

The Journal of Membrane BiologySpringer Journals

Published: Nov 18, 2008

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off