Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
BJ Ruijven (2012)
Implications of greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios for the main Asian regionsEnergy Econ., 34
JJ West (2013)
Co-benefits of global greenhouse gas mitigation for future air quality and human healthNat. Clim. Chang., 3
J Jewell, A Cherp, K Riahi (2014)
Energy security under de-carbonization scenarios: An assessment framework and evaluation under different technology and policy choicesEnergy Policy, 65
MR Raupach (2014)
Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissionsNat. Clim. Chang., 4
T. Stocker (2013)
SBSTA-IPCC Special Event Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis
O. Edenhofer, Ramón Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona (2014)
Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change
Ivana Chlapcová (2006)
Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-makingJournal of International Relations and Development, 9
N. Nakicenovic (2012)
Global Energy Assessment – Toward a Sustainable Future
E. Ostrom (1998)
A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997American Political Science Review, 92
S. Barrett (2003)
Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty‐makingManagement of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 14
D Griggs (2013)
Sustainable development goals for people and planetNature, 495
S Rao (2013)
Better air for better health: Forging synergies in policies for energy access, climate change and air pollutionGlob. Environ. Chang., 23
GP Peters, RM Andrew, S Solomon, P Friedlingstein (2015)
Measuring a fair and ambitious climate agreement using cumulative emissionsEnviron. Res. Lett., 10
YR Pont, ML Jeffery, J Gütschow, P Christoff, M Meinshausen (2016)
National contributions for decarbonizing the world economy in line with the G7 agreementEnviron. Res. Lett., 11
A. Cherp, A. Adenikinju, A. Goldthau, Francisco Hernandez, L. Hughes, J. Jansen, J. Jewell, Marina Olshanskaya, Ricardo Oliveira, B. Sovacool, S. Vakulenko (2012)
Chapter 5 - Energy and Security : Global Energy Assessment - Toward a Sustainable Future
(2011)
Equitable Access to Sustainable Development: Contribution to the Body of Scientific Knowledge (BASIC expert group, 2011); http://gdrights
JE Aldy, WA Pizer (2016)
Alternative metrics for comparing domestic climate change mitigation efforts and the emerging international climate policy architectureRev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 10
E Ostrom (1998)
A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential addressAm. Polit. Sci. Rev., 92
D. Griggs, M. Stafford-Smith, O. Gaffney, J. Rockström, M. Öhman, P. Shyamsundar, W. Steffen, G. Glaser, N. Kanie, I. Noble (2013)
Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planetNature, 495
AA Fawcett (2015)
Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?Science, 350
C Stechow (2015)
Integrating global climate change mitigation goals with other sustainability objectives: A synthesisAnnu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 40
C Cameron (2016)
Policy trade-offs between climate mitigation and clean cook-stove access in South AsiaNat. Energy, 1
J Aldy (2016)
Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris AgreementNat. Clim. Chang., 6
CA Hartin, B Bond-Lamberty, P Patel, A Mundra (2016)
Ocean acidification over the next three centuries using a simple global climate carbon-cycle model: projections and sensitivitiesBiogeosciences, 13
C Stechow (2016)
2 °C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall?Environ. Res. Lett., 11
V Daioglou, BJ Ruijven, DP Vuuren (2012)
Model projections for household energy use in developing countriesEnergy, 37
G Iyer (2015)
Improved representation of investment decisions in assessments of CO2 mitigationNat. Clim. Chang., 5
R Gignac, HD Matthews (2015)
Allocating a 2 °C cumulative carbon budget to countriesEnviron. Res. Lett., 10
J. Finger, U. Reinke, A. Castro (1999)
Market Access Bargaining in the Uruguay Round: Rigid or Relaxed Reciprocity?
M Wise (2009)
Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energyScience, 324
TA Persson, C Azar, D Johansson, K Lindgren (2007)
Major oil exporters may profit rather than lose, in a carbon-constrained worldEnergy Policy, 35
MGJ Elzen, N Höhne, MM Hagemann, J Vliet, DP Vuuren (2010)
Sharing developed countries’ post-2012 greenhouse gas emission reductions based on comparable effortsMitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang., 15
J Jewell (2016)
Comparison and interactions between the long-term pursuit of energy independence and climate policiesNat. Energy, 1
K Calvin (2012)
Implications of simultaneously mitigating and adapting to climate change: initial experiments using GCAMClim. Chang., 117
K Calvin (2013)
Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targetsClim. Chang., 123
M Tavoni (2013)
The distribution of the major economies’ effort in the Durban platform scenariosClim.Change Econ., 4
An important component of the Paris Agreement is the assessment of comparability across nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Indeed, game-theory literature on international environmental agreements highlights the need for comparable emission-mitigation efforts by countries to avoid free-riding 1 . At the same time, there are well-recognized links between mitigation and other national priorities, including but not limited to the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2–6 , which raises the question of how such links might influence comparability assessments. Here, using a global integrated assessment model 7 , we demonstrate that geographical distributions of the influence of meeting the domestic mitigation component of the NDCs on a subset of the broader SDGs may not align with distributions of effort across NDCs obtained from conventional emissions-based or cost-based comparability metrics 8–11 . This implies that comparability assessments would be altered if interactions between mitigation and other SDGs were accounted for. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the extent to which these distributions differ depends on the degree to which mitigation activities directly affect broader SDGs domestically and indirectly affect international goals, and whether these effects are synergistic or antagonistic. Our analysis provides a foundation for assessing how comparability across NDCs could be better understood in the larger context of sustainability.
Nature Climate Change – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 29, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.