Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. D. Bean, R. Corona, R. Tuiran, K. A. Woodrow-Lafield (1998)
Quantification of migration between Mexico and the United StatesMigration Between Mexico and the United States: Binational Study, I
J. Durand, D. Massey, F. Charvet (2000)
The changing geography of Mexican immigration to the United States: 1910-1996Social Science Quarterly, 81
A. D. Schmidley, C. Gibson (1999)
US Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, Special Studies
P. Campbell (1997)
Population projections: states, 1995 - 2025.Current population reports. Series P-25, Population estimates and projections, P25-1131
A. Parnell, W. Alonso, P. Starr (1989)
The Politics of Numbers.Social Forces, 15
D. Poston (1997)
The U.S. census and congressional apportionmentSociety, 34
J. Robinson, Prithwis AHMED, D. Gupta, K. Woodrow, P. Gupta (1993)
Estimation of population coverage in the 1990 United States census based on demographic analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88 423
F. D. Bean, R. Corona, R. Tuiran, K. A. Woodrow-Lafield, J. Van Hook (2001)
Circular, invisible, and ambiguous migrants: Components of difference in estimates of the number of unauthorized Mexican migrants in the United StatesDemography, 38
M. Balinski, H. Young (1982)
Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote
S. Baker (1990)
Cautious Welcome, The: The Legalization Programs of the Immigration Reform and Control Act
L. Lollock (2001)
Current Population Reports
Johnson Hp (1999)
How many Californians? A review of population projections for the state.California counts, 1 1
K. Kammeyer (1974)
An introduction to population
D. Meissner, D. Papademetriou (1988)
The Legalization Countdown: A Third-Quarter Assessment.
(1997)
Media Services
D. Massey (1995)
The new immigration and ethnicity in the United States.Population and Development Review, 21
A. Bachu (1991)
Profile of the foreign-born population in the United States.Current population reports. Series P-20, Population characteristics, 176
W. Frey (1996)
Immigration domestic migration and demographic balkanization in America: new evidence for the 1990s.Population and Development Review, 22
(2001)
New census data and INS estimates of the unauthorized immigrant population
K. A. Woodrow (1991)
Undocumented population in 2000, Memorandum for the Record
E. W. Fernandez, J. G. Robinson (1994)
Illustrative ranges of the distribution of undocumented immigrants by state
Passel Js, Woodrow Ka (1984)
The judicial basis for enumeration of undocumented aliens in the 1980 census and implications for 1990
W. Frey (1995)
Immigration and internal migration “flight”: A California case studyPopulation and Environment, 16
D. Poston, L. Bouvier, H. Dan (1999)
The impacts of apportionment method, and legal and illegal immigration, on Congressional apportionment in the year 2000Population Research and Policy Review, 18
D. Levine, K. Hill, R. Warren (1986)
Immigration statistics : a story of neglectJournal of the American Statistical Association, 81
Margo Anderson, S. Fienberg (1999)
WHO COUNTS? THE POLITICS OF CENSUS-TAKING IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICA, 53
(1993)
Illegal aliens: despite data limitations, current methods provide better population estimates
D. L. Poston, S. A. Camarota, L. F. Bouvier, G. J. Li, H. Dan (1998)
Backgrounder
Peter Skerry (2000)
Counting on the census?Society, 39
J. Durand, D. S. Massey, F. Charnet (1910)
The changing geography of Mexican immigration to the United StatesSocial Science Quarterly, 81
J. Passel, K. Woodrow (1984)
Geographic Distribution of Undocumented Immigrants: Estimates of Undocumented Aliens Counted in the 1980 Census by State 1International Migration Review, 18
Campbell Gibson, E. Lennon (1999)
HISTORICAL CENSUS STATISTICS ON THE FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES: 1850TO1990
C. Wood (1999)
Losing control of America's future - the Census, birthright citizenship and illegal aliensHarvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 22
Davis St (1981)
Reapportionment: numerical politicsAmerican demographics, 3
Around the time of the US decennial censuses, a renewed interest emerges in the method for apportioning the US House of Representatives. Various methods may show slight variations in illustrative apportionments, with biases favoring less populous states, but the general pattern remains. Definition of certain groups as included in the apportionment counts and coverage levels for selected groups have been debated in the judicial system, legal journals, and government. Unauthorized residents, and, sometimes, lawful immigrants, are often singled out for exclusion. The legal issues are complex, and illustrating the effects of these groups' inclusion is problematic due to poor measures, nationally and geographically. Using approximate distributions, these analyses suggest this next apportionment might differ slightly under various scenarios such as ones excluding either recently entered unauthorized residents or all unauthorized residents. Allowing for net authorized immigration greater than official estimates for the 1990s might have some effect for large states.
Population Research and Policy Review – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 3, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.